The Librarian's Duty of Care: Emerging Professionalism or Can of Worms?

Fuente: ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferguson, Stuart, Weckert, John
Formato: Recurso educativo Open Access
Lenguaje:en
Publicado: 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1867181575385382914
author Ferguson, Stuart
Weckert, John
author_facet Ferguson, Stuart
Weckert, John
Ferguson, Stuart
Weckert, John
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents The Librarian's Duty of Care: Emerging Professionalism or Can of Worms? Ferguson, Stuart Weckert, John Accountability Case Studies Codes of Ethics Contracts Debate Information Scientists Legal Responsibility Librarians Professional Associations Examines case studies highlighting accountability, and relates accountability to concepts of responsibility and duty of care. Presents arguments against holding librarians accountable for misinformation, namely, the lack of contract between librarian and patron and the distinction drawn between information intermediaries (librarians) and knowledge workers (lawyers and accountants). Discusses existing codes of ethics and their appropriateness to associations claiming professional status. (PEN)
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_EJ579996
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 1998
record_format eric
spellingShingle The Librarian's Duty of Care: Emerging Professionalism or Can of Worms?
Ferguson, Stuart
Weckert, John
Accountability
Case Studies
Codes of Ethics
Contracts
Debate
Information Scientists
Legal Responsibility
Librarians
Professional Associations
The Librarian's Duty of Care: Emerging Professionalism or Can of Worms? Ferguson, Stuart Weckert, John Accountability Case Studies Codes of Ethics Contracts Debate Information Scientists Legal Responsibility Librarians Professional Associations Examines case studies highlighting accountability, and relates accountability to concepts of responsibility and duty of care. Presents arguments against holding librarians accountable for misinformation, namely, the lack of contract between librarian and patron and the distinction drawn between information intermediaries (librarians) and knowledge workers (lawyers and accountants). Discusses existing codes of ethics and their appropriateness to associations claiming professional status. (PEN)
title The Librarian's Duty of Care: Emerging Professionalism or Can of Worms?
topic Accountability
Case Studies
Codes of Ethics
Contracts
Debate
Information Scientists
Legal Responsibility
Librarians
Professional Associations
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ579996