Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Sprache: | en |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2003
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ678058 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1867180494778531840 |
|---|---|
| author | Dilevko, Juris Gottlieb, Lisa |
| author_facet | Dilevko, Juris Gottlieb, Lisa Dilevko, Juris Gottlieb, Lisa |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | The Politics of Standard Selection Guides: The Case of the "Public Library Catalog." Dilevko, Juris Gottlieb, Lisa Case Studies Graduate Students Higher Education Library Collection Development Library Collections Library Education Library Material Selection Problems Public Libraries Selection Tools Shows how a well-respected collection development tool contains ideological frames, using the "Public Library Catalog" (PLC) as an example. Evaluation by library science graduate students indicate that the PLC makes recommendations that have an imbalance of perspectives, overemphasize a particular facet or theory within a field, lack authority, and have usability problems. (Contains 48 references.) (MES) |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ678058 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2003 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | The Politics of Standard Selection Guides: The Case of the "Public Library Catalog." Dilevko, Juris Gottlieb, Lisa Case Studies Graduate Students Higher Education Library Collection Development Library Collections Library Education Library Material Selection Problems Public Libraries Selection Tools The Politics of Standard Selection Guides: The Case of the "Public Library Catalog." Dilevko, Juris Gottlieb, Lisa Case Studies Graduate Students Higher Education Library Collection Development Library Collections Library Education Library Material Selection Problems Public Libraries Selection Tools Shows how a well-respected collection development tool contains ideological frames, using the "Public Library Catalog" (PLC) as an example. Evaluation by library science graduate students indicate that the PLC makes recommendations that have an imbalance of perspectives, overemphasize a particular facet or theory within a field, lack authority, and have usability problems. (Contains 48 references.) (MES) |
| title | The Politics of Standard Selection Guides: The Case of the "Public Library Catalog." |
| topic | Case Studies Graduate Students Higher Education Library Collection Development Library Collections Library Education Library Material Selection Problems Public Libraries Selection Tools |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ678058 |