Thumbs up, and down
Fuente:
ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
2007
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867181079202365441 |
|---|---|
| author | Gold, Anne Marie |
| author_facet | Gold, Anne Marie Gold, Anne Marie |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | Thumbs up, and down Gold, Anne Marie Public Libraries Financial Support Library Administration Budgets State Legislation Operating Expenses Resource Allocation Voting If one wanted to win a library election in 2006, what would have been the mythical perfect referenda? For building referenda, the sweet spot was hit with measures over $10 million, on a ballot sometime between September and December, with no other items on the ballot, in a general election, for a library serving a population under 100,000. For the perfect operating referenda, one would fare best in a general election, but the other variables--other items on the ballot, timing, or size of population--do not appear to have the same impact. Interestingly, libraries serving the largest population--over 100,000--fared the best in operating referenda and the worst in building referenda. However, no referendum is ever perfect, so it ends up with mixed results, as evidenced by the 105 efforts reported in 2006--36 building referenda and 69 operating. (Contains 5 tables.) |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ786490 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | Thumbs up, and down Gold, Anne Marie Public Libraries Financial Support Library Administration Budgets State Legislation Operating Expenses Resource Allocation Voting Thumbs up, and down Gold, Anne Marie Public Libraries Financial Support Library Administration Budgets State Legislation Operating Expenses Resource Allocation Voting If one wanted to win a library election in 2006, what would have been the mythical perfect referenda? For building referenda, the sweet spot was hit with measures over $10 million, on a ballot sometime between September and December, with no other items on the ballot, in a general election, for a library serving a population under 100,000. For the perfect operating referenda, one would fare best in a general election, but the other variables--other items on the ballot, timing, or size of population--do not appear to have the same impact. Interestingly, libraries serving the largest population--over 100,000--fared the best in operating referenda and the worst in building referenda. However, no referendum is ever perfect, so it ends up with mixed results, as evidenced by the 105 efforts reported in 2006--36 building referenda and 69 operating. (Contains 5 tables.) |
| title | Thumbs up, and down |
| topic | Public Libraries Financial Support Library Administration Budgets State Legislation Operating Expenses Resource Allocation Voting |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ786490 |