Managing and Evaluating Digital Repositories
Fuente:
ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
2008
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867181605525651456 |
|---|---|
| author | Zuccala, Alesia Oppenheim, Charles Dhiensa, Rajveen |
| author_facet | Zuccala, Alesia Oppenheim, Charles Dhiensa, Rajveen Zuccala, Alesia Oppenheim, Charles Dhiensa, Rajveen |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | Managing and Evaluating Digital Repositories Zuccala, Alesia Oppenheim, Charles Dhiensa, Rajveen Information Science Education Information Science Electronic Libraries Archives Occupational Surveys Mail Surveys Computer Software Evaluation Administrator Role Library Administration User Needs (Information) User Satisfaction (Information) Users (Information) Performance Factors Program Attitudes Introduction: We examine the role of the digital repository manager, discuss the future of repository management and evaluation and suggest that library and information science schools develop new repository management curricula. Method: Face-to-face interviews were carried out with managers of five different types of repositories and a Web-based survey was carried out with users. The LexiURL Web link evaluation software provided a "webometric" basis for investigating potential users online. Results: Few managers had received any formal training. The repositories were relatively new and web statistics had been used by the managers to monitor their success. The LexiURL analysis indicated that the networks associated with the repository sites were predictable and made sense to managers because expected co-links and known links appeared in the network diagrams. Users of the repositories discovered them through friends and colleagues. Conclusion: Digital repositories require ongoing evaluation to determine their quality and new directions for growth. A LexiURL analysis could be carried out by managers every four to six months and used as a complement to transaction log file analyses. Repository managers will need formal training in the future and we suggest a set of modules that would be suitable for a specialist programme. (Contains 9 figures and 1 table.) |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ837244 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | Managing and Evaluating Digital Repositories Zuccala, Alesia Oppenheim, Charles Dhiensa, Rajveen Information Science Education Information Science Electronic Libraries Archives Occupational Surveys Mail Surveys Computer Software Evaluation Administrator Role Library Administration User Needs (Information) User Satisfaction (Information) Users (Information) Performance Factors Program Attitudes Managing and Evaluating Digital Repositories Zuccala, Alesia Oppenheim, Charles Dhiensa, Rajveen Information Science Education Information Science Electronic Libraries Archives Occupational Surveys Mail Surveys Computer Software Evaluation Administrator Role Library Administration User Needs (Information) User Satisfaction (Information) Users (Information) Performance Factors Program Attitudes Introduction: We examine the role of the digital repository manager, discuss the future of repository management and evaluation and suggest that library and information science schools develop new repository management curricula. Method: Face-to-face interviews were carried out with managers of five different types of repositories and a Web-based survey was carried out with users. The LexiURL Web link evaluation software provided a "webometric" basis for investigating potential users online. Results: Few managers had received any formal training. The repositories were relatively new and web statistics had been used by the managers to monitor their success. The LexiURL analysis indicated that the networks associated with the repository sites were predictable and made sense to managers because expected co-links and known links appeared in the network diagrams. Users of the repositories discovered them through friends and colleagues. Conclusion: Digital repositories require ongoing evaluation to determine their quality and new directions for growth. A LexiURL analysis could be carried out by managers every four to six months and used as a complement to transaction log file analyses. Repository managers will need formal training in the future and we suggest a set of modules that would be suitable for a specialist programme. (Contains 9 figures and 1 table.) |
| title | Managing and Evaluating Digital Repositories |
| topic | Information Science Education Information Science Electronic Libraries Archives Occupational Surveys Mail Surveys Computer Software Evaluation Administrator Role Library Administration User Needs (Information) User Satisfaction (Information) Users (Information) Performance Factors Program Attitudes |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ837244 |