Transcending Library Catalogs: A Comparative Study of Controlled Terms in Library of Congress Subject Headings and User-Generated Tags in LibraryThing for Transgender Books

Fuente: ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adler, Melissa
Format: Recurso educativo Open Access
Language:en
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867181008063823872
author Adler, Melissa
author_facet Adler, Melissa
Adler, Melissa
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents Transcending Library Catalogs: A Comparative Study of Controlled Terms in Library of Congress Subject Headings and User-Generated Tags in LibraryThing for Transgender Books Adler, Melissa Comparative Analysis Cataloging Online Catalogs Library Research Case Studies Social Networks Indexing Information Retrieval Online Searching Classification Sexual Identity Sexual Orientation Perhaps the greatest power of folksonomies, especially when set against controlled vocabularies like the Library of Congress Subject Headings, lies in their capacity to empower user communities to name their own resources in their own terms. This article analyzes the potential and limitations of both folksonomies and controlled vocabularies for transgender materials by analyzing the subject headings in WorldCat records and the user-generated tags in LibraryThing for books with transgender themes. A close examination of the subject headings and tags for twenty books on transgender topics reveals a disconnect between the language used by people who own these books and the terms authorized by the Library of Congress and assigned by catalogers to describe and organize transgender-themed books. The terms most commonly assigned by users are far less common or non-existent in WorldCat. The folksonomies also provide spaces for a multiplicity of representations, including a range of gender expressions, whereas these entities are often absent from Library of Congress Subject Headings and WorldCat. While folksonomies are democratic and respond quickly to shifts and expansions of categories, they lack control and may inhibit findability of resources. Neither tags nor subject headings are perfect systems by themselves, but they may complement each other well in library catalogs. Bringing users' voices into catalogs through the addition of tags might greatly enhance organization, representation, and retrieval of transgender-themed materials. (Contains 1 figure and 2 tables.)
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_EJ870666
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 2009
record_format eric
spellingShingle Transcending Library Catalogs: A Comparative Study of Controlled Terms in Library of Congress Subject Headings and User-Generated Tags in LibraryThing for Transgender Books
Adler, Melissa
Comparative Analysis
Cataloging
Online Catalogs
Library Research
Case Studies
Social Networks
Indexing
Information Retrieval
Online Searching
Classification
Sexual Identity
Sexual Orientation
Transcending Library Catalogs: A Comparative Study of Controlled Terms in Library of Congress Subject Headings and User-Generated Tags in LibraryThing for Transgender Books Adler, Melissa Comparative Analysis Cataloging Online Catalogs Library Research Case Studies Social Networks Indexing Information Retrieval Online Searching Classification Sexual Identity Sexual Orientation Perhaps the greatest power of folksonomies, especially when set against controlled vocabularies like the Library of Congress Subject Headings, lies in their capacity to empower user communities to name their own resources in their own terms. This article analyzes the potential and limitations of both folksonomies and controlled vocabularies for transgender materials by analyzing the subject headings in WorldCat records and the user-generated tags in LibraryThing for books with transgender themes. A close examination of the subject headings and tags for twenty books on transgender topics reveals a disconnect between the language used by people who own these books and the terms authorized by the Library of Congress and assigned by catalogers to describe and organize transgender-themed books. The terms most commonly assigned by users are far less common or non-existent in WorldCat. The folksonomies also provide spaces for a multiplicity of representations, including a range of gender expressions, whereas these entities are often absent from Library of Congress Subject Headings and WorldCat. While folksonomies are democratic and respond quickly to shifts and expansions of categories, they lack control and may inhibit findability of resources. Neither tags nor subject headings are perfect systems by themselves, but they may complement each other well in library catalogs. Bringing users' voices into catalogs through the addition of tags might greatly enhance organization, representation, and retrieval of transgender-themed materials. (Contains 1 figure and 2 tables.)
title Transcending Library Catalogs: A Comparative Study of Controlled Terms in Library of Congress Subject Headings and User-Generated Tags in LibraryThing for Transgender Books
topic Comparative Analysis
Cataloging
Online Catalogs
Library Research
Case Studies
Social Networks
Indexing
Information Retrieval
Online Searching
Classification
Sexual Identity
Sexual Orientation
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ870666