Benefits and Harms of Sick Leave: Lack of Randomized, Controlled Trials

Fuente: ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Axelsson, Inge, Marnetoft, Sven-Uno
Format: Recurso educativo Open Access
Language:en
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867181455665266688
author Axelsson, Inge
Marnetoft, Sven-Uno
author_facet Axelsson, Inge
Marnetoft, Sven-Uno
Axelsson, Inge
Marnetoft, Sven-Uno
collection Education Resources Information Center
contents Benefits and Harms of Sick Leave: Lack of Randomized, Controlled Trials Axelsson, Inge Marnetoft, Sven-Uno Accidents Patients Injuries Employees Employment Health Rehabilitation Disabilities The aim of this study was to try to identify those randomized controlled trials that compare sick leave with no sick leave or a different duration or degree of sick leave. A comprehensive, systematic, electronic search of Clinical Evidence, the Cochrane Library and PubMed, and a manual search of the Campbell Library and a journal supplement was carried out. Only two studies with randomization of sick leave were found. Patients, who were suspected of having whiplash injuries following a car accident, were randomly assigned to either 14 days on sick leave wearing a neck collar, or no neck collar or sick leave, and employees with musculoskeletal disorders were randomized to part-time sick leave and work adjustments, or full-time sick leave. Over 99% of the studies on sick leave were observational. The reason for the scarcity of randomized controlled trials is unknown. There is a definite, urgent need for randomized, controlled studies of the effects that sick leave has on health issues.
format Recurso educativo Open Access
id eric_EJ885630
institution ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
language en
publishDate 2010
record_format eric
spellingShingle Benefits and Harms of Sick Leave: Lack of Randomized, Controlled Trials
Axelsson, Inge
Marnetoft, Sven-Uno
Accidents
Patients
Injuries
Employees
Employment
Health
Rehabilitation
Disabilities
Benefits and Harms of Sick Leave: Lack of Randomized, Controlled Trials Axelsson, Inge Marnetoft, Sven-Uno Accidents Patients Injuries Employees Employment Health Rehabilitation Disabilities The aim of this study was to try to identify those randomized controlled trials that compare sick leave with no sick leave or a different duration or degree of sick leave. A comprehensive, systematic, electronic search of Clinical Evidence, the Cochrane Library and PubMed, and a manual search of the Campbell Library and a journal supplement was carried out. Only two studies with randomization of sick leave were found. Patients, who were suspected of having whiplash injuries following a car accident, were randomly assigned to either 14 days on sick leave wearing a neck collar, or no neck collar or sick leave, and employees with musculoskeletal disorders were randomized to part-time sick leave and work adjustments, or full-time sick leave. Over 99% of the studies on sick leave were observational. The reason for the scarcity of randomized controlled trials is unknown. There is a definite, urgent need for randomized, controlled studies of the effects that sick leave has on health issues.
title Benefits and Harms of Sick Leave: Lack of Randomized, Controlled Trials
topic Accidents
Patients
Injuries
Employees
Employment
Health
Rehabilitation
Disabilities
url https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ885630