Publishing Practices of NIH-Funded Faculty at MIT
Fuente:
ERIC Institute of Education Sciences
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| Sprache: | en |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2010
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1867181528611553280 |
|---|---|
| author | Crummett, Courtney Duranceau, Ellen Finnie Gabridge, Tracy A. Green, Remlee S. Kajosalo, Erja Noga, Michael M. Silver, Howard J. Stout, Amy |
| author_facet | Crummett, Courtney Duranceau, Ellen Finnie Gabridge, Tracy A. Green, Remlee S. Kajosalo, Erja Noga, Michael M. Silver, Howard J. Stout, Amy Crummett, Courtney Duranceau, Ellen Finnie Gabridge, Tracy A. Green, Remlee S. Kajosalo, Erja Noga, Michael M. Silver, Howard J. Stout, Amy |
| collection | Education Resources Information Center |
| contents | Publishing Practices of NIH-Funded Faculty at MIT Crummett, Courtney Duranceau, Ellen Finnie Gabridge, Tracy A. Green, Remlee S. Kajosalo, Erja Noga, Michael M. Silver, Howard J. Stout, Amy College Faculty Faculty Publishing Public Agencies Financial Support Library Services Interviews Journal Articles Copyrights Faculty and researchers who receive substantial funding from NIH were interviewed about their publication practices. Qualitative data was collected from interviews of eleven faculty members and one researcher representing six academic departments who received NIH funding. Interview responses were analyzed to identify a representative publication workflow and common themes related to the publication process. The goals of this study were to inform librarians about faculty publication practices; to learn how faculty are affected by and responding to NIH publication policy changes; and to inform planning and discussion about new services to support NIH compliance in addition to general faculty publishing. Major themes from the interviews included consistency in publishing workflows, but variety in authorship patterns and in data management practices. Significant points of pain for authors included difficulty finding quality reviewers, frustrating submission processes, and discomfort about the implications of publication agreements. Some authors found the NIH submission requirement to be burdensome, but most assumed their publishers were taking care of this process for them. Implications for library services are considered. (Contains 2 tables and 1 figure.) |
| format | Recurso educativo Open Access |
| id | eric_EJ911938 |
| institution | ERIC Institute of Education Sciences |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| record_format | eric |
| spellingShingle | Publishing Practices of NIH-Funded Faculty at MIT Crummett, Courtney Duranceau, Ellen Finnie Gabridge, Tracy A. Green, Remlee S. Kajosalo, Erja Noga, Michael M. Silver, Howard J. Stout, Amy College Faculty Faculty Publishing Public Agencies Financial Support Library Services Interviews Journal Articles Copyrights Publishing Practices of NIH-Funded Faculty at MIT Crummett, Courtney Duranceau, Ellen Finnie Gabridge, Tracy A. Green, Remlee S. Kajosalo, Erja Noga, Michael M. Silver, Howard J. Stout, Amy College Faculty Faculty Publishing Public Agencies Financial Support Library Services Interviews Journal Articles Copyrights Faculty and researchers who receive substantial funding from NIH were interviewed about their publication practices. Qualitative data was collected from interviews of eleven faculty members and one researcher representing six academic departments who received NIH funding. Interview responses were analyzed to identify a representative publication workflow and common themes related to the publication process. The goals of this study were to inform librarians about faculty publication practices; to learn how faculty are affected by and responding to NIH publication policy changes; and to inform planning and discussion about new services to support NIH compliance in addition to general faculty publishing. Major themes from the interviews included consistency in publishing workflows, but variety in authorship patterns and in data management practices. Significant points of pain for authors included difficulty finding quality reviewers, frustrating submission processes, and discomfort about the implications of publication agreements. Some authors found the NIH submission requirement to be burdensome, but most assumed their publishers were taking care of this process for them. Implications for library services are considered. (Contains 2 tables and 1 figure.) |
| title | Publishing Practices of NIH-Funded Faculty at MIT |
| topic | College Faculty Faculty Publishing Public Agencies Financial Support Library Services Interviews Journal Articles Copyrights |
| url | https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ911938 |