Distribution of income and job opportunities: normative judgements from four continents
Fuente:
Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT)
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Published: |
International Labour Organization
2002
|
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1874525344163168259 |
|---|---|
| author | Deborah Levison Joseph A. Ritter Rosamund Stock Richard Anker |
| author_facet | Deborah Levison Joseph A. Ritter Rosamund Stock Richard Anker Deborah Levison Joseph A. Ritter Rosamund Stock Richard Anker |
| contents | Distribution of income and job opportunities: normative judgements from four continents Deborah Levison Joseph A. Ritter Rosamund Stock Richard Anker How do people define distributional justice? What are the personal characteristics or situations that influence how people define distributional justice? Leaving aside the values assumed by policy-makers and experts, the authors analyse PSS respondents' preferences as between the distributional principles of need, equality and equity. In particular, they investigate the preferences of different demographic groups and empirically verify the previously observed pattern of consensus on need as a distributional principle combined with dissensus on the acceptability of inequality. They also examine whether people of lower socio-economic status favour distributional rules that would mitigate their position, including support for positive discrimination in labour markets. publication.journalArticle |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | ilo_995218936302676 |
| institution | Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT) |
| publishDate | 2002 |
| publisher | International Labour Organization |
| spellingShingle | Distribution of income and job opportunities: normative judgements from four continents Deborah Levison Joseph A. Ritter Rosamund Stock Richard Anker Distribution of income and job opportunities: normative judgements from four continents Deborah Levison Joseph A. Ritter Rosamund Stock Richard Anker How do people define distributional justice? What are the personal characteristics or situations that influence how people define distributional justice? Leaving aside the values assumed by policy-makers and experts, the authors analyse PSS respondents' preferences as between the distributional principles of need, equality and equity. In particular, they investigate the preferences of different demographic groups and empirically verify the previously observed pattern of consensus on need as a distributional principle combined with dissensus on the acceptability of inequality. They also examine whether people of lower socio-economic status favour distributional rules that would mitigate their position, including support for positive discrimination in labour markets. publication.journalArticle |
| title | Distribution of income and job opportunities: normative judgements from four continents |
| url | https://researchrepository.ilo.org/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/Distribution-of-income-and-job-opportunities/995218936302676 |