Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Entrada de enciclopedia |
| Published: |
International Labour Organization
2019
|
| Online Access: | https://researchrepository.ilo.org/esploro/outputs/encyclopediaEntry/Joint-provision-of-income-and-employment/995219017202676 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1874524895473303555 |
|---|---|
| author | Verónica Escudero Elva López Mourelo Clemente Pignatti |
| author_facet | Verónica Escudero Elva López Mourelo Clemente Pignatti Verónica Escudero Elva López Mourelo Clemente Pignatti |
| contents | Joint provision of income and employment support: evidence from a crisis response in Uruguay Verónica Escudero Elva López Mourelo Clemente Pignatti There is an increasing recognition in the policy debate of the importance of providing support to unemployed individuals through a combination of income support and active labour market policies. However, very little evidence exists on the effectiveness of this policy approach (and possible tradeoffs) beyond developed economies. We provide one of the first evaluations of these schemes in the context of an emerging economy by looking at a public works programme (Plan de Asistencia Nacional a la Emergencia Social (PANES)), implemented in Uruguay between 2005 and 2007 as part of a comprehensive cash transfer intervention that reached around 10 per cent of households in the country during a major recession. Exploiting specific eligibility criteria for participation in the cash transfer programme, we use rich administrative data of panel nature to study the effects of (i) participating in the public works programme (active component), (ii) receiving the cash transfer (income-support component and, (iii) of benefiting of both the active and income-support programmes. We find that participation in the active programme has positive (albeit only marginally significant) effects on the employment probability, but non-significant effects on the quality of the job found. The positive employment effect does not generate displacement effects from participants to nonparticipants within the same household. However, the effect fades away when participants receive the cash transfer. Finally, the programme did not have any effect on measures of civic engagement and social integration. Research Department working paper (International Labour Organization), no. 41, ILO publication.encyclopediaEntry |
| format | Entrada de enciclopedia |
| id | ilo_995219017202676 |
| institution | Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT) |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | International Labour Organization |
| spellingShingle | Joint provision of income and employment support: evidence from a crisis response in Uruguay Verónica Escudero Elva López Mourelo Clemente Pignatti Joint provision of income and employment support: evidence from a crisis response in Uruguay Verónica Escudero Elva López Mourelo Clemente Pignatti There is an increasing recognition in the policy debate of the importance of providing support to unemployed individuals through a combination of income support and active labour market policies. However, very little evidence exists on the effectiveness of this policy approach (and possible tradeoffs) beyond developed economies. We provide one of the first evaluations of these schemes in the context of an emerging economy by looking at a public works programme (Plan de Asistencia Nacional a la Emergencia Social (PANES)), implemented in Uruguay between 2005 and 2007 as part of a comprehensive cash transfer intervention that reached around 10 per cent of households in the country during a major recession. Exploiting specific eligibility criteria for participation in the cash transfer programme, we use rich administrative data of panel nature to study the effects of (i) participating in the public works programme (active component), (ii) receiving the cash transfer (income-support component and, (iii) of benefiting of both the active and income-support programmes. We find that participation in the active programme has positive (albeit only marginally significant) effects on the employment probability, but non-significant effects on the quality of the job found. The positive employment effect does not generate displacement effects from participants to nonparticipants within the same household. However, the effect fades away when participants receive the cash transfer. Finally, the programme did not have any effect on measures of civic engagement and social integration. Research Department working paper (International Labour Organization), no. 41, ILO publication.encyclopediaEntry |
| title | Joint provision of income and employment support: evidence from a crisis response in Uruguay |
| url | https://researchrepository.ilo.org/esploro/outputs/encyclopediaEntry/Joint-provision-of-income-and-employment/995219017202676 |