The architecture of global labour governance

Fuente: Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT)
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frank Hendrickx, Axel Marx, Glenn Rayp, Jan Wouters
Formato: Artículo científico
Publicado: International Labour Organization 2016
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1874525269196275713
author Frank Hendrickx
Axel Marx
Glenn Rayp
Jan Wouters
author_facet Frank Hendrickx
Axel Marx
Glenn Rayp
Jan Wouters
Frank Hendrickx
Axel Marx
Glenn Rayp
Jan Wouters
contents The architecture of global labour governance Frank Hendrickx Axel Marx Glenn Rayp Jan Wouters In their introduction to this Special Issue, the authors situate the architecture of global labour governance against the background of the challenges posed by globalization. Noting the limitations of a conventional governmental approach to labour governance, they suggest considering new “hybrid” regulatory modes and mechanisms, which involve a combination of public and private actors and initiatives alongside or instead of traditional international labour law. The authors conclude by examining possible explanations for the emergence of gaps in the enforcement of labour rights, looking in particular at the issues of labour-standard “selectivity” and the stringency with which standards are enforced. 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2015.00039.x DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2015.00039.x publication.journalArticle
format Artículo científico
id ilo_995219356002676
institution Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT)
publishDate 2016
publisher International Labour Organization
spellingShingle The architecture of global labour governance
Frank Hendrickx
Axel Marx
Glenn Rayp
Jan Wouters
The architecture of global labour governance Frank Hendrickx Axel Marx Glenn Rayp Jan Wouters In their introduction to this Special Issue, the authors situate the architecture of global labour governance against the background of the challenges posed by globalization. Noting the limitations of a conventional governmental approach to labour governance, they suggest considering new “hybrid” regulatory modes and mechanisms, which involve a combination of public and private actors and initiatives alongside or instead of traditional international labour law. The authors conclude by examining possible explanations for the emergence of gaps in the enforcement of labour rights, looking in particular at the issues of labour-standard “selectivity” and the stringency with which standards are enforced. 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2015.00039.x DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2015.00039.x publication.journalArticle
title The architecture of global labour governance
url https://researchrepository.ilo.org/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/The-architecture-of-global-labour-governance/995219356002676