Accounting for income inequality: empirical evidence from India

Fuente: Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT)
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uma Rani, Jaya Krishnakumar, Maurizio Bigotta
Format: Artículo científico
Published: International Labour Organization 2017
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1874525222587072514
author Uma Rani
Jaya Krishnakumar
Maurizio Bigotta
author_facet Uma Rani
Jaya Krishnakumar
Maurizio Bigotta
Uma Rani
Jaya Krishnakumar
Maurizio Bigotta
contents Accounting for income inequality: empirical evidence from India Uma Rani Jaya Krishnakumar Maurizio Bigotta This paper decomposes income inequality using the regression-based decomposition technique. The paper analyses the role of education, experience, employment status, industry and their interactions in accounting for differences in income and its inequality in India over the past three decades. The results clearly show that education is the most dominant factor contributing to inequality in both rural and urban areas. Separate inequality decomposition analyses for each employment status group show that although education is the most important factor contributing to inequality for the salaried, and to an extent for the self-employed workers, it is much less important for the casual workers. Other factors such as household size, size of land holdings, and regional variations contribute to increasing inequality among casual and self-employed worker households. publication.journalArticle
format Artículo científico
id ilo_995268373302676
institution Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT)
publishDate 2017
publisher International Labour Organization
spellingShingle Accounting for income inequality: empirical evidence from India
Uma Rani
Jaya Krishnakumar
Maurizio Bigotta
Accounting for income inequality: empirical evidence from India Uma Rani Jaya Krishnakumar Maurizio Bigotta This paper decomposes income inequality using the regression-based decomposition technique. The paper analyses the role of education, experience, employment status, industry and their interactions in accounting for differences in income and its inequality in India over the past three decades. The results clearly show that education is the most dominant factor contributing to inequality in both rural and urban areas. Separate inequality decomposition analyses for each employment status group show that although education is the most important factor contributing to inequality for the salaried, and to an extent for the self-employed workers, it is much less important for the casual workers. Other factors such as household size, size of land holdings, and regional variations contribute to increasing inequality among casual and self-employed worker households. publication.journalArticle
title Accounting for income inequality: empirical evidence from India
url https://researchrepository.ilo.org/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/Accounting-for-income-inequality-empirical-evidence/995268373302676