Unemployment and labour market institutions: the failure of the empirical case for deregulation
Fuente:
Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT)
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Entrada de enciclopedia |
| Pubblicazione: |
International Labour Organization
2004
|
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1874525017599901699 |
|---|---|
| author | Dean Baker Andrew Glyn David R. Howell John Schmitt |
| author_facet | Dean Baker Andrew Glyn David R. Howell John Schmitt Dean Baker Andrew Glyn David R. Howell John Schmitt |
| contents | Unemployment and labour market institutions: the failure of the empirical case for deregulation Dean Baker Andrew Glyn David R. Howell John Schmitt Based on a survey of the literature, assesses the strength of the evidence regarding the effects of labour market institutions and regulations on unemployment. Considers the effects of employment protection, trade union density, bargaining coordination, unemployment benefits, the labour tax wedge and active labour market policies. Argues that empirical results are largely inconclusive and suggests that there is no single model that guarantees successful employment performance. Working paper (International Labour Organization. Policy Integration Department), no. 43, ILO publication.encyclopediaEntry |
| format | Entrada de enciclopedia |
| id | ilo_995328541702676 |
| institution | Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT) |
| publishDate | 2004 |
| publisher | International Labour Organization |
| spellingShingle | Unemployment and labour market institutions: the failure of the empirical case for deregulation Dean Baker Andrew Glyn David R. Howell John Schmitt Unemployment and labour market institutions: the failure of the empirical case for deregulation Dean Baker Andrew Glyn David R. Howell John Schmitt Based on a survey of the literature, assesses the strength of the evidence regarding the effects of labour market institutions and regulations on unemployment. Considers the effects of employment protection, trade union density, bargaining coordination, unemployment benefits, the labour tax wedge and active labour market policies. Argues that empirical results are largely inconclusive and suggests that there is no single model that guarantees successful employment performance. Working paper (International Labour Organization. Policy Integration Department), no. 43, ILO publication.encyclopediaEntry |
| title | Unemployment and labour market institutions: the failure of the empirical case for deregulation |
| url | https://researchrepository.ilo.org/esploro/outputs/encyclopediaEntry/Unemployment-and-labour-market-institutions-the/995328541702676 |