Why are unemployment individual savings accounts not an adequate and equitable solution to unemployment protection?
Fuente:
Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT)
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Entrada de enciclopedia |
| Published: |
International Labour Organization
2024
|
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1874524938042343431 |
|---|---|
| author | International Labour Organization (Issuing Body) |
| author_facet | International Labour Organization (Issuing Body) International Labour Organization (Issuing Body) |
| contents | Why are unemployment individual savings accounts not an adequate and equitable solution to unemployment protection? International Labour Organization (Issuing Body) This policy brief highlights the limitations of Unemployment Individual Savings Accounts (UISA), emphasizing that they are not an adequate and equitable solution to unemployment protection. It underscores the need for risk pooling and collective financing, established through social insurance mechanisms, and warns against relying on UISA, which increase costs and fail to provide adequate protection for those in temporary, seasonal and low pay jobs. ILO brief. Social protection spotlight, ILO 10.54394/QWMJ1314 DOI https://doi.org/10.54394/QWMJ1314 publication.encyclopediaEntry |
| format | Entrada de enciclopedia |
| id | ilo_995632443202676 |
| institution | Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT) |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | International Labour Organization |
| spellingShingle | Why are unemployment individual savings accounts not an adequate and equitable solution to unemployment protection? International Labour Organization (Issuing Body) Why are unemployment individual savings accounts not an adequate and equitable solution to unemployment protection? International Labour Organization (Issuing Body) This policy brief highlights the limitations of Unemployment Individual Savings Accounts (UISA), emphasizing that they are not an adequate and equitable solution to unemployment protection. It underscores the need for risk pooling and collective financing, established through social insurance mechanisms, and warns against relying on UISA, which increase costs and fail to provide adequate protection for those in temporary, seasonal and low pay jobs. ILO brief. Social protection spotlight, ILO 10.54394/QWMJ1314 DOI https://doi.org/10.54394/QWMJ1314 publication.encyclopediaEntry |
| title | Why are unemployment individual savings accounts not an adequate and equitable solution to unemployment protection? |
| url | https://researchrepository.ilo.org/esploro/outputs/encyclopediaEntry/Why-are-unemployment-individual-savings-accounts/995632443202676 |