Targeting and coveraghe of the Bolsa Família Programme
Fuente:
Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT)
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Documento de trabajo |
| Publicado: |
International Labour Organization
2010
|
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1874524921713917953 |
|---|---|
| author | Sergei Suarez Dillon Soares Rafael Perez Ribas Fábio Veras Soares |
| author_facet | Sergei Suarez Dillon Soares Rafael Perez Ribas Fábio Veras Soares Sergei Suarez Dillon Soares Rafael Perez Ribas Fábio Veras Soares |
| contents | Targeting and coveraghe of the Bolsa Família Programme Sergei Suarez Dillon Soares Rafael Perez Ribas Fábio Veras Soares The trade-off between targeting and coverage has always been something of a quandary for progressive cash transfers, particularly those that are not entitlements. Undue inclusion errors mean that families or individuals whose need is not so great are being paid at the expense of either taxpayers or other budgetary priorities. Undue exclusion errors mean that those who are in need, sometimes in desperate need, are not being helped by the state. This trade-off is somewhat less extreme for entitlements. If the law says that families whose income is less than a quarter of a minimum wage are entitled to a given cash allowance, then all those whose income falls under that line should receive the allowance. There is still a trade-off because measurement error still occurs, but the discussion centres only on the inclusion criteria. Most conditional cash transfers (CCTs), however, are not entitlements. The trade-off between targeting and coverage has always been something of a quandary for progressive cash transfers, particularly those that are not entitlements. Undue inclusion errors mean that families or individuals whose need is not so great are being paid at the expense of either taxpayers or other budgetary priorities. Undue exclusion errors mean that those who are in need, sometimes in desperate need, are not being helped by the state. This trade-off is somewhat less extreme for entitlements. If the law says that families whose income is less than a quarter of a minimum wage are entitled to a given cash allowance, then all those whose income falls under that line should receive the allowance. There is still a trade-off because measurement error still occurs, but the discussion centres only on the inclusion criteria. Most conditional cash transfers (CCTs), however, are not entitlements. Working Paper , 71, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada postedContent.workingPaper |
| format | Documento de trabajo |
| id | ilo_995673139802676 |
| institution | Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT) |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publisher | International Labour Organization |
| spellingShingle | Targeting and coveraghe of the Bolsa Família Programme Sergei Suarez Dillon Soares Rafael Perez Ribas Fábio Veras Soares Targeting and coveraghe of the Bolsa Família Programme Sergei Suarez Dillon Soares Rafael Perez Ribas Fábio Veras Soares The trade-off between targeting and coverage has always been something of a quandary for progressive cash transfers, particularly those that are not entitlements. Undue inclusion errors mean that families or individuals whose need is not so great are being paid at the expense of either taxpayers or other budgetary priorities. Undue exclusion errors mean that those who are in need, sometimes in desperate need, are not being helped by the state. This trade-off is somewhat less extreme for entitlements. If the law says that families whose income is less than a quarter of a minimum wage are entitled to a given cash allowance, then all those whose income falls under that line should receive the allowance. There is still a trade-off because measurement error still occurs, but the discussion centres only on the inclusion criteria. Most conditional cash transfers (CCTs), however, are not entitlements. The trade-off between targeting and coverage has always been something of a quandary for progressive cash transfers, particularly those that are not entitlements. Undue inclusion errors mean that families or individuals whose need is not so great are being paid at the expense of either taxpayers or other budgetary priorities. Undue exclusion errors mean that those who are in need, sometimes in desperate need, are not being helped by the state. This trade-off is somewhat less extreme for entitlements. If the law says that families whose income is less than a quarter of a minimum wage are entitled to a given cash allowance, then all those whose income falls under that line should receive the allowance. There is still a trade-off because measurement error still occurs, but the discussion centres only on the inclusion criteria. Most conditional cash transfers (CCTs), however, are not entitlements. Working Paper , 71, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada postedContent.workingPaper |
| title | Targeting and coveraghe of the Bolsa Família Programme |
| url | https://researchrepository.ilo.org/esploro/outputs/workingPaper/Targeting-and-coveraghe-of-the-Bolsa/995673139802676 |