Aeolian dust and chemistry records from the EDML and EDC ice cores

Fuente: PANGAEA
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruth, Urs, Barbante, Carlo, Bigler, Matthias, Delmonte, Barbara, Fischer, Hubertus, Gabrielli, Paolo, Gaspari, Vania, Kaufmann, Patrik R, Lambert, Fabrice, Maggi, Valter, Marino, Federica, Petit, Jean Robert, Udisti, Roberto, Wagenbach, Dietmar, Wegner, Anna, Wolff, Eric William
Format: Dataset Open Access
Language:en
Published: PANGAEA 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867169496950636544
author Ruth, Urs
Barbante, Carlo
Bigler, Matthias
Delmonte, Barbara
Fischer, Hubertus
Gabrielli, Paolo
Gaspari, Vania
Kaufmann, Patrik R
Lambert, Fabrice
Maggi, Valter
Marino, Federica
Petit, Jean Robert
Udisti, Roberto
Wagenbach, Dietmar
Wegner, Anna
Wolff, Eric William
author_facet Ruth, Urs
Barbante, Carlo
Bigler, Matthias
Delmonte, Barbara
Fischer, Hubertus
Gabrielli, Paolo
Gaspari, Vania
Kaufmann, Patrik R
Lambert, Fabrice
Maggi, Valter
Marino, Federica
Petit, Jean Robert
Udisti, Roberto
Wagenbach, Dietmar
Wegner, Anna
Wolff, Eric William
collection Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales
contents To improve quantitative interpretation of ice core aeolian dust records a systematic methodical comparison has been made involving methods of water-insoluble particle counting (Coulter Counter and laser-sensing particle detector), soluble ions (ion chromatography, IC, and continuous flow analysis, CFA), elemental analysis (inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy, ICP-MS, at pH 1 and after full acid digestion), and water-insoluble elemental analysis (proton induced X-ray emission, PIXE). Ice core samples covering the last deglaciation have been used from the EPICA Dome C (EDC) and the EPICA Dronning Maud Land (EDML) ice cores. All methods correlate very well amongst each other. The ratios of glacial age concentrations to Holocene concentrations, which are typically a factor ~100, differ significantly between the methods, but differences are limited to a factor < 2 for most methods with insoluble particles showing the largest change. The recovery of ICP-MS measurements depends on the digestion method and is different for different elements and during different climatic periods. EDC and EDML samples have similar dust composition, which suggests a common dust source or a common mixture of sources for the two sites. The analysed samples further reveal a change of dust composition during the last deglaciation.
format Dataset Open Access
id pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_690364
institution PANGAEA
language en
publishDate 2008
publisher PANGAEA
record_format pangaea
spellingShingle Aeolian dust and chemistry records from the EDML and EDC ice cores
Ruth, Urs
Barbante, Carlo
Bigler, Matthias
Delmonte, Barbara
Fischer, Hubertus
Gabrielli, Paolo
Gaspari, Vania
Kaufmann, Patrik R
Lambert, Fabrice
Maggi, Valter
Marino, Federica
Petit, Jean Robert
Udisti, Roberto
Wagenbach, Dietmar
Wegner, Anna
Wolff, Eric William
Dome_C; Dome C, Antarctica; EDC; EDML; EDRILL; EPICA; EPICA-Campaigns; EPICA Dome C; EPICA drill; EPICA Dronning Maud Land, DML28C01_00; European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica; ICEDRILL; Ice drill; Kohnen Station
To improve quantitative interpretation of ice core aeolian dust records a systematic methodical comparison has been made involving methods of water-insoluble particle counting (Coulter Counter and laser-sensing particle detector), soluble ions (ion chromatography, IC, and continuous flow analysis, CFA), elemental analysis (inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy, ICP-MS, at pH 1 and after full acid digestion), and water-insoluble elemental analysis (proton induced X-ray emission, PIXE). Ice core samples covering the last deglaciation have been used from the EPICA Dome C (EDC) and the EPICA Dronning Maud Land (EDML) ice cores. All methods correlate very well amongst each other. The ratios of glacial age concentrations to Holocene concentrations, which are typically a factor ~100, differ significantly between the methods, but differences are limited to a factor < 2 for most methods with insoluble particles showing the largest change. The recovery of ICP-MS measurements depends on the digestion method and is different for different elements and during different climatic periods. EDC and EDML samples have similar dust composition, which suggests a common dust source or a common mixture of sources for the two sites. The analysed samples further reveal a change of dust composition during the last deglaciation.
title Aeolian dust and chemistry records from the EDML and EDC ice cores
topic Dome_C; Dome C, Antarctica; EDC; EDML; EDRILL; EPICA; EPICA-Campaigns; EPICA Dome C; EPICA drill; EPICA Dronning Maud Land, DML28C01_00; European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica; ICEDRILL; Ice drill; Kohnen Station
url https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.690364