(Figure 3) Modeled GEM-3 susceptibility and conductivity response under decreasing water depth

Documenti analoghi

• (Figure 9b) Correlation of EM and sediment core susceptibility
  di: Müller, H, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2012)
• (Figure 7b) Apparent susceptibility profiles by various available sensor sizes of dipping sulfidic (magnetite-reducing) zone
  di: Müller, H, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2012)
• (Figure 7a) Simulations of apparent susceptibility and conductivity profiles of a dipping mud/sand boundary
  di: Müller, H, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2012)
• (Figure 5c) In-phase and quadrature responses of GEM-3 sensor at various operation frequencies
  di: Müller, H, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2012)
• (Figure 6b) Horizontal footprint diameter (90% of the total signal) and half-width (50%) of susceptibility, quadrature and in-phase conductivity
  di: Müller, H, et al.
  Pubblicazione: (2012)