(Figure 5c) In-phase and quadrature responses of GEM-3 sensor at various operation frequencies

Similar Items

• (Figure 7b) Apparent susceptibility profiles by various available sensor sizes of dipping sulfidic (magnetite-reducing) zone
  by: Müller, H, et al.
  Published: (2012)
• (Figure 6b) Horizontal footprint diameter (90% of the total signal) and half-width (50%) of susceptibility, quadrature and in-phase conductivity
  by: Müller, H, et al.
  Published: (2012)
• (Figure 5b) Vertical sensor characteristics of GEM-3 (96 cm coil) for quadrature conductivity given as weighting functions and cumulative subsurface response
  by: Müller, H, et al.
  Published: (2012)
• (Figure 9a) Correlation of EM and sediment core porosity
  by: Müller, H, et al.
  Published: (2012)
• (Figure 9b) Correlation of EM and sediment core susceptibility
  by: Müller, H, et al.
  Published: (2012)