Stable isotope analyses of Cretaceous sediment samples

Fuente: PANGAEA
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Turchyn, Alexandra V, Schrag, Daniel P, Coccioni, Rodolfo, Montanari, Alessandro
Format: Dataset Open Access
Language:en
Published: PANGAEA 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867168560929832960
author Turchyn, Alexandra V
Schrag, Daniel P
Coccioni, Rodolfo
Montanari, Alessandro
author_facet Turchyn, Alexandra V
Schrag, Daniel P
Coccioni, Rodolfo
Montanari, Alessandro
collection Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales
contents We report the sulfur and oxygen isotope composition of sulfate (d34SSO4 and d18OSO4, respectively) in coexisting barite and carbonate-associated sulfate (CAS), which we use to explore temporal variability in the marine sulfur cycle through the middle Cretaceous. The d34SSO4 of marine barite tracks previously reported sulfur isotope data from the tropical Pacific. The d18OSO4 of marine barite exhibits more rapid and larger isotopic excursions than the d34SSO4 of marine barite; these excursions temporally coincide with Ocean Anoxic Events (OAEs). Neither the d34SSO4 nor the d18OSO4 measured in marine barite resembles the d34SSO4 or the d18OSO4 measured in coexisting CAS. Culling our data set for elemental parameters suggestive of carbonate recrystallization (low [Sr] and high Mn/Sr) improves our record of d18OSO4 in CAS in the Cretaceous. This suggests that the CAS proxy can be impacted by carbonate recrystallization in some marine sediments. A box model is used to explore the response of the d34SSO4 and d18OSO4 to different perturbations in the marine biogeochemical sulfur cycle. We conclude that the d34SSO4 in the middle Cretaceous is likely responding to a change in the isotopic composition of pyrite being buried, coupled possibly with a change in riverine input. On the other hand, the d18OSO4 is likely responding to rapid changes in the reoxidation pathway of sulfide, which we suggest may be due to anoxic versus euxinic conditions during different OAEs.
format Dataset Open Access
id pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_785789
institution PANGAEA
language en
publishDate 2009
publisher PANGAEA
record_format pangaea
spellingShingle Stable isotope analyses of Cretaceous sediment samples
Turchyn, Alexandra V
Schrag, Daniel P
Coccioni, Rodolfo
Montanari, Alessandro
Deep Sea Drilling Project; DSDP; Ocean Drilling Program; ODP
We report the sulfur and oxygen isotope composition of sulfate (d34SSO4 and d18OSO4, respectively) in coexisting barite and carbonate-associated sulfate (CAS), which we use to explore temporal variability in the marine sulfur cycle through the middle Cretaceous. The d34SSO4 of marine barite tracks previously reported sulfur isotope data from the tropical Pacific. The d18OSO4 of marine barite exhibits more rapid and larger isotopic excursions than the d34SSO4 of marine barite; these excursions temporally coincide with Ocean Anoxic Events (OAEs). Neither the d34SSO4 nor the d18OSO4 measured in marine barite resembles the d34SSO4 or the d18OSO4 measured in coexisting CAS. Culling our data set for elemental parameters suggestive of carbonate recrystallization (low [Sr] and high Mn/Sr) improves our record of d18OSO4 in CAS in the Cretaceous. This suggests that the CAS proxy can be impacted by carbonate recrystallization in some marine sediments. A box model is used to explore the response of the d34SSO4 and d18OSO4 to different perturbations in the marine biogeochemical sulfur cycle. We conclude that the d34SSO4 in the middle Cretaceous is likely responding to a change in the isotopic composition of pyrite being buried, coupled possibly with a change in riverine input. On the other hand, the d18OSO4 is likely responding to rapid changes in the reoxidation pathway of sulfide, which we suggest may be due to anoxic versus euxinic conditions during different OAEs.
title Stable isotope analyses of Cretaceous sediment samples
topic Deep Sea Drilling Project; DSDP; Ocean Drilling Program; ODP
url https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.785789