Abundance of mesozooplankton in the western part of the Black Sea in summer 2001 during the National Monitoring Programme of the Bulgarian Institute of Oceanography
Fuente:
PANGAEA
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Dataset Open Access |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
PANGAEA
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867170985116958720 |
|---|---|
| author | Stefanova, Kremena Kamburska, Lyudmila |
| author_facet | Stefanova, Kremena Kamburska, Lyudmila |
| collection | Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales |
| contents | The dataset is based on samples collected in the summer of 2001 in the Western Black Sea in front of Bulgaria coast (transects at c. Kaliakra and c. Galata). The whole dataset is composed of 26 samples (from 10 stations of National Monitoring Grid) with data of mesozooplankton species composition abundance and biomass. Samples were collected in discrete layers 0-10, 10-20, 10-25, 25-50, 50-75, 75-90. Zooplankton samples were collected with vertical closing Juday net,diameter - 36cm, mesh size 150 µm. Tows were performed from surface down to bottom meters depths in discrete layers. Samples were preserved by a 4% formaldehyde sea water buffered solution. Sampling volume was estimated by multiplying the mouth area with the wire length. Mesozooplankton abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Lyudmila Kamburska and Kremena Stefanova using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). Taxon-specific abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Copepods and Cladoceras were identified and enumerated; the other mesozooplankters were identified and enumerated at higher taxonomic level (commonly named as mesozooplankton groups). Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Lyudmila Kamburska and Kremena Stefanova using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). |
| format | Dataset Open Access |
| id | pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_846920 |
| institution | PANGAEA |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | PANGAEA |
| record_format | pangaea |
| spellingShingle | Abundance of mesozooplankton in the western part of the Black Sea in summer 2001 during the National Monitoring Programme of the Bulgarian Institute of Oceanography Stefanova, Kremena Kamburska, Lyudmila 15AK2001080-Zoo_1; 15AK2001080-Zoo_10; 15AK2001080-Zoo_2; 15AK2001080-Zoo_3; 15AK2001080-Zoo_4; 15AK2001080-Zoo_5; 15AK2001080-Zoo_6; 15AK2001080-Zoo_7; 15AK2001080-Zoo_8; 15AK2001080-Zoo_9; Acartia clausi, adult; Acartia clausi, c1-c5; Acartia clausi, nauplii; Admiral Br. Ormanov; after Dimov (1959); Aurelia aurita; Bivalvia, veliger; Black Sea; Calanus euxinus, adult; Calanus euxinus, c1-c5; Calanus euxinus, nauplii; Centropages ponticus, adult; Centropages ponticus, c1-c5; Centropages ponticus, nauplii; Cirripedia, cypris; Cirripedia, nauplii; Copepoda, c1-c5; Copepoda, nauplii; Copepoda, ova; Date/Time of event; Decapoda, larvae; Depth, bottom/max; Depth, top/min; DEPTH, water; Evadne nordmanni; Evadne spinifera; Evadne tergestina; Event label; Favella ehrenbergii; Gastropoda, veliger; Harpacticoida sp.; JUDAY; Juday net; Latitude of event; Longitude of event; Mesozooplankton; Mnemiopsis leidyi; Mnemiopsis leidyi, larvae; Mnemiopsis leidyi, ova; NationalMonitoring-01-summer; Noctiluca scintillans; Oikopleura dioica; Oithona nana, adult; Oithona similis, adult; Oithona sp., nauplii; Oncaea sp.; Paracalanus parvus, adult; Paracalanus parvus, c1-c5; Penilia avirostris; Pisces, larvae; Pisces, ova; Pleopis polyphemoides; Pleurobrachia pileus; Polychaeta, larvae; Pseudocalanus elongatus, adult; Pseudocalanus elongatus, c1-c5; Rotatoria sp.; Sagitta setosa, adult; Sagitta setosa, juvenile; Sample comment; SESAME; Southern European Seas: Assessing and Modelling Ecosystem Changes; Station_201; Station_202; Station_203; Station_204; Station_300; Station_301; Station_302; Station_303; Station_304; Station_305; Tintinnina The dataset is based on samples collected in the summer of 2001 in the Western Black Sea in front of Bulgaria coast (transects at c. Kaliakra and c. Galata). The whole dataset is composed of 26 samples (from 10 stations of National Monitoring Grid) with data of mesozooplankton species composition abundance and biomass. Samples were collected in discrete layers 0-10, 10-20, 10-25, 25-50, 50-75, 75-90. Zooplankton samples were collected with vertical closing Juday net,diameter - 36cm, mesh size 150 µm. Tows were performed from surface down to bottom meters depths in discrete layers. Samples were preserved by a 4% formaldehyde sea water buffered solution. Sampling volume was estimated by multiplying the mouth area with the wire length. Mesozooplankton abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Lyudmila Kamburska and Kremena Stefanova using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). Taxon-specific abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Copepods and Cladoceras were identified and enumerated; the other mesozooplankters were identified and enumerated at higher taxonomic level (commonly named as mesozooplankton groups). Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Lyudmila Kamburska and Kremena Stefanova using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). |
| title | Abundance of mesozooplankton in the western part of the Black Sea in summer 2001 during the National Monitoring Programme of the Bulgarian Institute of Oceanography |
| topic | 15AK2001080-Zoo_1; 15AK2001080-Zoo_10; 15AK2001080-Zoo_2; 15AK2001080-Zoo_3; 15AK2001080-Zoo_4; 15AK2001080-Zoo_5; 15AK2001080-Zoo_6; 15AK2001080-Zoo_7; 15AK2001080-Zoo_8; 15AK2001080-Zoo_9; Acartia clausi, adult; Acartia clausi, c1-c5; Acartia clausi, nauplii; Admiral Br. Ormanov; after Dimov (1959); Aurelia aurita; Bivalvia, veliger; Black Sea; Calanus euxinus, adult; Calanus euxinus, c1-c5; Calanus euxinus, nauplii; Centropages ponticus, adult; Centropages ponticus, c1-c5; Centropages ponticus, nauplii; Cirripedia, cypris; Cirripedia, nauplii; Copepoda, c1-c5; Copepoda, nauplii; Copepoda, ova; Date/Time of event; Decapoda, larvae; Depth, bottom/max; Depth, top/min; DEPTH, water; Evadne nordmanni; Evadne spinifera; Evadne tergestina; Event label; Favella ehrenbergii; Gastropoda, veliger; Harpacticoida sp.; JUDAY; Juday net; Latitude of event; Longitude of event; Mesozooplankton; Mnemiopsis leidyi; Mnemiopsis leidyi, larvae; Mnemiopsis leidyi, ova; NationalMonitoring-01-summer; Noctiluca scintillans; Oikopleura dioica; Oithona nana, adult; Oithona similis, adult; Oithona sp., nauplii; Oncaea sp.; Paracalanus parvus, adult; Paracalanus parvus, c1-c5; Penilia avirostris; Pisces, larvae; Pisces, ova; Pleopis polyphemoides; Pleurobrachia pileus; Polychaeta, larvae; Pseudocalanus elongatus, adult; Pseudocalanus elongatus, c1-c5; Rotatoria sp.; Sagitta setosa, adult; Sagitta setosa, juvenile; Sample comment; SESAME; Southern European Seas: Assessing and Modelling Ecosystem Changes; Station_201; Station_202; Station_203; Station_204; Station_300; Station_301; Station_302; Station_303; Station_304; Station_305; Tintinnina |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.846920 |