Abundance of mesozooplankton in the western part of the Black Sea in 1995 during the Cooperative Marine Science Program for the Black Sea (CoMSBlack)
Fuente:
PANGAEA
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Dataset Open Access |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
PANGAEA
2015
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1867168167387725824 |
|---|---|
| author | Konsulov, Asen Kamburska, Lyudmila |
| author_facet | Konsulov, Asen Kamburska, Lyudmila |
| collection | Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales |
| contents | The “CoMSBlack-95” dataset is based on samples collected in the summer of 1995. The whole dataset is composed of 81 samples (28 stations) with data of zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass. Samples were collected in discrete layers 0-10, 0-20, 0-50, 10-25, 25-50, 50-100 and from bottom up to the surface at depths depending on water column stratification and the thermocline depth. Zooplankton samples were collected with vertical closing Juday net,diameter - 36 cm, mesh size 150 µm. Tows were performed from surface down to bottom meters depths in discrete layers. Samples were preserved by a 4% formaldehyde sea water buffered solution. Sampling volume was estimated by multiplying the mouth area with the wire length. Mesozooplankton abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Asen Konsulov and Lyudmila Kamburska using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). Taxon-specific abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Copepods and Cladoceras were identified and enumerated; the other mesozooplankters were identified and enumerated at higher taxonomic level (commonly named as mesozooplankton groups). Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Asen Konsulov and Lyudmila Kamburska using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). |
| format | Dataset Open Access |
| id | pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_846935 |
| institution | PANGAEA |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | PANGAEA |
| record_format | pangaea |
| spellingShingle | Abundance of mesozooplankton in the western part of the Black Sea in 1995 during the Cooperative Marine Science Program for the Black Sea (CoMSBlack) Konsulov, Asen Kamburska, Lyudmila 15AK1995077-Zoo_1; 15AK1995077-Zoo_10; 15AK1995077-Zoo_11; 15AK1995077-Zoo_12; 15AK1995077-Zoo_13; 15AK1995077-Zoo_14; 15AK1995077-Zoo_15; 15AK1995077-Zoo_16; 15AK1995077-Zoo_17; 15AK1995077-Zoo_18; 15AK1995077-Zoo_19; 15AK1995077-Zoo_2; 15AK1995077-Zoo_20; 15AK1995077-Zoo_21; 15AK1995077-Zoo_22; 15AK1995077-Zoo_23; 15AK1995077-Zoo_24; 15AK1995077-Zoo_25; 15AK1995077-Zoo_26; 15AK1995077-Zoo_27; 15AK1995077-Zoo_28; 15AK1995077-Zoo_3; 15AK1995077-Zoo_4; 15AK1995077-Zoo_5; 15AK1995077-Zoo_6; 15AK1995077-Zoo_7; 15AK1995077-Zoo_8; 15AK1995077-Zoo_9; Acartia clausi, adult; Acartia clausi, c1-c5; Acartia clausi, nauplii; after Dimov (1959); Akademik; Aurelia aurita; Bivalvia, veliger; Black Sea; Calanus euxinus, adult; Calanus euxinus, nauplii; Calanus euxinus, ova; Cirripedia, cypris; Cirripedia, nauplii; CoMSBlack_95; Copepoda, nauplii; Copepoda, ova; Date/Time of event; Decapoda, larvae; Depth, bottom/max; Depth, top/min; DEPTH, water; Evadne nordmanni; Evadne spinifera; Evadne tergestina; Event label; Gastropoda, veliger; JUDAY; Juday net; Latitude of event; Longitude of event; M10K20; M30K05; M30K20; M30K45; M30L15; M30L45; M40J50; M50K05; M50K20; M50K45; M50L15; M50M15; Mesozooplankton; Mnemiopsis leidyi; N10K02; N10K05; N10K12; N10K20; N10K50; N10L15; N10L45; N10M15; N10M45; N22K30; N30K40; N30K50; N30L15; N30L45; N30M15; N30M45; Noctiluca scintillans; Oikopleura dioica; Oithona nana, adult; Oithona similis, adult; Paracalanus parvus, adult; Paracalanus parvus, c1-c5; Penilia avirostris; Pisces, larvae; Pisces, ova; Pleopis polyphemoides; Pleurobrachia pileus; Podon leuckarti; Polychaeta, larvae; Pseudocalanus elongatus, adult; Pseudocalanus elongatus, c1-c5; Pseudocalanus elongatus, nauplii; Sagitta setosa, adult; Sagitta setosa, juvenile; Sample comment; SESAME; Southern European Seas: Assessing and Modelling Ecosystem Changes The “CoMSBlack-95” dataset is based on samples collected in the summer of 1995. The whole dataset is composed of 81 samples (28 stations) with data of zooplankton species composition, abundance and biomass. Samples were collected in discrete layers 0-10, 0-20, 0-50, 10-25, 25-50, 50-100 and from bottom up to the surface at depths depending on water column stratification and the thermocline depth. Zooplankton samples were collected with vertical closing Juday net,diameter - 36 cm, mesh size 150 µm. Tows were performed from surface down to bottom meters depths in discrete layers. Samples were preserved by a 4% formaldehyde sea water buffered solution. Sampling volume was estimated by multiplying the mouth area with the wire length. Mesozooplankton abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Asen Konsulov and Lyudmila Kamburska using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). Taxon-specific abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Copepods and Cladoceras were identified and enumerated; the other mesozooplankters were identified and enumerated at higher taxonomic level (commonly named as mesozooplankton groups). Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Asen Konsulov and Lyudmila Kamburska using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). |
| title | Abundance of mesozooplankton in the western part of the Black Sea in 1995 during the Cooperative Marine Science Program for the Black Sea (CoMSBlack) |
| topic | 15AK1995077-Zoo_1; 15AK1995077-Zoo_10; 15AK1995077-Zoo_11; 15AK1995077-Zoo_12; 15AK1995077-Zoo_13; 15AK1995077-Zoo_14; 15AK1995077-Zoo_15; 15AK1995077-Zoo_16; 15AK1995077-Zoo_17; 15AK1995077-Zoo_18; 15AK1995077-Zoo_19; 15AK1995077-Zoo_2; 15AK1995077-Zoo_20; 15AK1995077-Zoo_21; 15AK1995077-Zoo_22; 15AK1995077-Zoo_23; 15AK1995077-Zoo_24; 15AK1995077-Zoo_25; 15AK1995077-Zoo_26; 15AK1995077-Zoo_27; 15AK1995077-Zoo_28; 15AK1995077-Zoo_3; 15AK1995077-Zoo_4; 15AK1995077-Zoo_5; 15AK1995077-Zoo_6; 15AK1995077-Zoo_7; 15AK1995077-Zoo_8; 15AK1995077-Zoo_9; Acartia clausi, adult; Acartia clausi, c1-c5; Acartia clausi, nauplii; after Dimov (1959); Akademik; Aurelia aurita; Bivalvia, veliger; Black Sea; Calanus euxinus, adult; Calanus euxinus, nauplii; Calanus euxinus, ova; Cirripedia, cypris; Cirripedia, nauplii; CoMSBlack_95; Copepoda, nauplii; Copepoda, ova; Date/Time of event; Decapoda, larvae; Depth, bottom/max; Depth, top/min; DEPTH, water; Evadne nordmanni; Evadne spinifera; Evadne tergestina; Event label; Gastropoda, veliger; JUDAY; Juday net; Latitude of event; Longitude of event; M10K20; M30K05; M30K20; M30K45; M30L15; M30L45; M40J50; M50K05; M50K20; M50K45; M50L15; M50M15; Mesozooplankton; Mnemiopsis leidyi; N10K02; N10K05; N10K12; N10K20; N10K50; N10L15; N10L45; N10M15; N10M45; N22K30; N30K40; N30K50; N30L15; N30L45; N30M15; N30M45; Noctiluca scintillans; Oikopleura dioica; Oithona nana, adult; Oithona similis, adult; Paracalanus parvus, adult; Paracalanus parvus, c1-c5; Penilia avirostris; Pisces, larvae; Pisces, ova; Pleopis polyphemoides; Pleurobrachia pileus; Podon leuckarti; Polychaeta, larvae; Pseudocalanus elongatus, adult; Pseudocalanus elongatus, c1-c5; Pseudocalanus elongatus, nauplii; Sagitta setosa, adult; Sagitta setosa, juvenile; Sample comment; SESAME; Southern European Seas: Assessing and Modelling Ecosystem Changes |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.846935 |