(Table 1) Egg size, clutch asymmetry, hatch date and breeding success in south polar skua, brown skua and mixed pairs on King George Island

Fuente: PANGAEA
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Hahn, Steffen, Reinhardt, Klaus, Ritz, Markus S, Janicke, Tim, Montalti, Diego, Peter, Hans-Ulrich
Format: Dataset Open Access
Langue:en
Publié: PANGAEA 2007
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1867169106088689664
author Hahn, Steffen
Reinhardt, Klaus
Ritz, Markus S
Janicke, Tim
Montalti, Diego
Peter, Hans-Ulrich
author_facet Hahn, Steffen
Reinhardt, Klaus
Ritz, Markus S
Janicke, Tim
Montalti, Diego
Peter, Hans-Ulrich
collection Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales
contents We studied how environmental conditions affect reproduction in sympatric skua species that differ in their reliance on marine resources: the exclusively marine foraging south polar skua Catharacta maccormicki, the terrestrially foraging brown skua C. antarctica lonnbergi and mixed species pairs with an intermediate diet. Egg size, clutch asymmetry and hatching dates varied between species and years without consistent patterns. In the south polar skuas, 12 to 38% of the variation in these parameters was explained by sea surface temperature, sea ice cover and local weather. In mixed species pairs and brown skuas, the influence of environmental factors on variation in clutch asymmetry and hatching date decreased to 10-29%, and no effect on egg size was found. Annual variation in offspring growth performance also differed between species with variable growth in chicks of south polar skuas and mixed species pairs, and almost uniform growth in brown skuas. Additionally, the dependency on oceanographic and climatic factors, especially local wind conditions, decreased from south polar skuas to brown skua chicks. Consistent in all species, offspring were more sensitive to environmental conditions during early stages; during the late chick stage (>33 d) chick growth was almost independent of environmental conditions. The net breeding success could not be predicted by any environmental factor in any skua species, suggesting it may not be a sensitive indicator of environmental conditions. Hence, the sensitivity of skuas to environmental conditions varied between species, with south polar skuas being more sensitive than brown skuas, and between breeding periods, with the egg parameters being more susceptible to oceanographic conditions. However, during offspring development, local climatic conditions became more important. We conclude that future climate change in the Maritime Antarctic will affect reproduction of skuas more strongly through changes in sea ice cover and sea surface temperature (and the resulting alterations to the marine food web) than through local weather conditions.
format Dataset Open Access
id pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_848021
institution PANGAEA
language en
publishDate 2007
publisher PANGAEA
record_format pangaea
spellingShingle (Table 1) Egg size, clutch asymmetry, hatch date and breeding success in south polar skua, brown skua and mixed pairs on King George Island
Hahn, Steffen
Reinhardt, Klaus
Ritz, Markus S
Janicke, Tim
Montalti, Diego
Peter, Hans-Ulrich
Biological sample; BIOS; Calculated according to Catry & Furness (1997); Comment; Date; Eggs, clutch asymmetry; Egg volume; Number of fledglings per nest; Potter_Pen; Potter Peninsula, King George Island, Western Antarctica; Priority Programme 1158 Antarctic Research with Comparable Investigations in Arctic Sea Ice Areas; Sample amount, subset; Species; Species, common name; SPP1158; Time coverage
We studied how environmental conditions affect reproduction in sympatric skua species that differ in their reliance on marine resources: the exclusively marine foraging south polar skua Catharacta maccormicki, the terrestrially foraging brown skua C. antarctica lonnbergi and mixed species pairs with an intermediate diet. Egg size, clutch asymmetry and hatching dates varied between species and years without consistent patterns. In the south polar skuas, 12 to 38% of the variation in these parameters was explained by sea surface temperature, sea ice cover and local weather. In mixed species pairs and brown skuas, the influence of environmental factors on variation in clutch asymmetry and hatching date decreased to 10-29%, and no effect on egg size was found. Annual variation in offspring growth performance also differed between species with variable growth in chicks of south polar skuas and mixed species pairs, and almost uniform growth in brown skuas. Additionally, the dependency on oceanographic and climatic factors, especially local wind conditions, decreased from south polar skuas to brown skua chicks. Consistent in all species, offspring were more sensitive to environmental conditions during early stages; during the late chick stage (>33 d) chick growth was almost independent of environmental conditions. The net breeding success could not be predicted by any environmental factor in any skua species, suggesting it may not be a sensitive indicator of environmental conditions. Hence, the sensitivity of skuas to environmental conditions varied between species, with south polar skuas being more sensitive than brown skuas, and between breeding periods, with the egg parameters being more susceptible to oceanographic conditions. However, during offspring development, local climatic conditions became more important. We conclude that future climate change in the Maritime Antarctic will affect reproduction of skuas more strongly through changes in sea ice cover and sea surface temperature (and the resulting alterations to the marine food web) than through local weather conditions.
title (Table 1) Egg size, clutch asymmetry, hatch date and breeding success in south polar skua, brown skua and mixed pairs on King George Island
topic Biological sample; BIOS; Calculated according to Catry & Furness (1997); Comment; Date; Eggs, clutch asymmetry; Egg volume; Number of fledglings per nest; Potter_Pen; Potter Peninsula, King George Island, Western Antarctica; Priority Programme 1158 Antarctic Research with Comparable Investigations in Arctic Sea Ice Areas; Sample amount, subset; Species; Species, common name; SPP1158; Time coverage
url https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.848021