Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pithan, Felix, Ackerman, Andrew, Angevine, Wayne, Hartung, Kerstin, Ickes, Luisa, Kelley, Maxwell, Medeiros, Brian P, Sandu, Irina, Steeneveld, Gert-Jan, Sterk, HAM, Svensson, Gunilla, Vaillancourt, Paul A, Zadra, Ayrton
Format: Dataset Open Access
Language:en
Published: PANGAEA 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.856770
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867170988577259520
author Pithan, Felix
Ackerman, Andrew
Angevine, Wayne
Hartung, Kerstin
Ickes, Luisa
Kelley, Maxwell
Medeiros, Brian P
Sandu, Irina
Steeneveld, Gert-Jan
Sterk, HAM
Svensson, Gunilla
Vaillancourt, Paul A
Zadra, Ayrton
author_facet Pithan, Felix
Ackerman, Andrew
Angevine, Wayne
Hartung, Kerstin
Ickes, Luisa
Kelley, Maxwell
Medeiros, Brian P
Sandu, Irina
Steeneveld, Gert-Jan
Sterk, HAM
Svensson, Gunilla
Vaillancourt, Paul A
Zadra, Ayrton
collection Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales
contents Weather and climate models struggle to represent lower tropospheric temperature and moisture profiles and surface fluxes in Arctic winter, not least because they lack or misrepresent physical processes that are specific to high latitudes. The Arctic boundary layer in winter has been observed to be in either a radiatively clear or cloudy state: The radiatively clear state is characterized by strong surface radiative cooling leading to the build-up of surface-based temperature inversions, whereas the cloudy state occurs when cloud liquid water is present in the atmospheric column, allowing little or no surface radiative cooling and leading to weaker and typically elevated temperature inversions. Many large-scale models have been shown to lack the cloudy state, and some do substantially underestimate stability in the clear state. We here present results from the first Lagrangian ARCtic air FORMation experiment (Larcform 1), a GASS (Global atmospheric system studies) single-column model intercomparison which reproduces these biases of large-scale models in an idealised setup.
format Dataset Open Access
id pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_856770
institution PANGAEA
language en
publishDate 2016
publisher PANGAEA
record_format pangaea
spellingShingle Larcform 1 - single column model intercomparison of Arctic air formation, link to model results in NetCDF format
Pithan, Felix
Ackerman, Andrew
Angevine, Wayne
Hartung, Kerstin
Ickes, Luisa
Kelley, Maxwell
Medeiros, Brian P
Sandu, Irina
Steeneveld, Gert-Jan
Sterk, HAM
Svensson, Gunilla
Vaillancourt, Paul A
Zadra, Ayrton

Weather and climate models struggle to represent lower tropospheric temperature and moisture profiles and surface fluxes in Arctic winter, not least because they lack or misrepresent physical processes that are specific to high latitudes. The Arctic boundary layer in winter has been observed to be in either a radiatively clear or cloudy state: The radiatively clear state is characterized by strong surface radiative cooling leading to the build-up of surface-based temperature inversions, whereas the cloudy state occurs when cloud liquid water is present in the atmospheric column, allowing little or no surface radiative cooling and leading to weaker and typically elevated temperature inversions. Many large-scale models have been shown to lack the cloudy state, and some do substantially underestimate stability in the clear state. We here present results from the first Lagrangian ARCtic air FORMation experiment (Larcform 1), a GASS (Global atmospheric system studies) single-column model intercomparison which reproduces these biases of large-scale models in an idealised setup.
title Larcform 1 - single column model intercomparison of Arctic air formation, link to model results in NetCDF format
topic
url https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.856770