Quantifying the stability of planktic foraminiferal physical niches

Fuente: PANGAEA
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Waterson, Amy, Edgar, Kirsty M, Schmidt, Daniela N, Valdes, Paul J
Format: Dataset Open Access
Language:en
Published: PANGAEA 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867169118166188032
author Waterson, Amy
Edgar, Kirsty M
Schmidt, Daniela N
Valdes, Paul J
author_facet Waterson, Amy
Edgar, Kirsty M
Schmidt, Daniela N
Valdes, Paul J
collection Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales
contents The application of transfer functions on fossil assemblages to reconstruct past environments is fundamentally based on the assumption of stable environmental niches in both space and time. We quantitatively test this assumption for six dominant planktic foraminiferal species (Globigerinoides ruber (pink), G. ruber (white), Trilobatus sacculifer, Truncorotalia truncatulinoides, Globigerina bulloides and Neogloboquadrina pachyderma) by contrasting reconstructions of species realised and optimum distributions in the modern and during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) using an ecological niche model (ENM; MaxEnt) and ordination framework. Global ecological niche models calibrated in the modern ocean have high predictive performance when projected to the LGM for sub-polar and polar species, indicating that the environmental niches of these taxa are largely stable at the global scale across this interval. In contrast, ENM's had much poorer predictive performance for the optimal niche of tropical-dwelling species, T. sacculifer and G. ruber (pink). This finding is supported by independent metrics of niche margin change, suggesting that niche stability in environmental space was greatest for (sub)polar species, with greatest expansion of the niche observed for tropical species. We find that globally calibrated ENMs showed good predictions of species occurrences globally, whereas models calibrated in either the Pacific or Atlantic Oceans only and then projected globally performed less well for T. sacculifer. Our results support the assumption of environmental niche stability over the last ~21,000 years for most of our focal planktic foraminiferal species and thus, the application of transfer function techniques for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction during this interval. However, the lower observed niche stability for (sub)tropical taxa T. sacculifer and G. ruber (pink) suggests that (sub)tropical temperatures could be underestimated in the glacial ocean with the strongest effect in the equatorial Atlantic where both species are found today.
format Dataset Open Access
id pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_871284
institution PANGAEA
language en
publishDate 2017
publisher PANGAEA
record_format pangaea
spellingShingle Quantifying the stability of planktic foraminiferal physical niches
Waterson, Amy
Edgar, Kirsty M
Schmidt, Daniela N
Valdes, Paul J
File content; File format; File name; File size; Uniform resource locator/link to file
The application of transfer functions on fossil assemblages to reconstruct past environments is fundamentally based on the assumption of stable environmental niches in both space and time. We quantitatively test this assumption for six dominant planktic foraminiferal species (Globigerinoides ruber (pink), G. ruber (white), Trilobatus sacculifer, Truncorotalia truncatulinoides, Globigerina bulloides and Neogloboquadrina pachyderma) by contrasting reconstructions of species realised and optimum distributions in the modern and during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) using an ecological niche model (ENM; MaxEnt) and ordination framework. Global ecological niche models calibrated in the modern ocean have high predictive performance when projected to the LGM for sub-polar and polar species, indicating that the environmental niches of these taxa are largely stable at the global scale across this interval. In contrast, ENM's had much poorer predictive performance for the optimal niche of tropical-dwelling species, T. sacculifer and G. ruber (pink). This finding is supported by independent metrics of niche margin change, suggesting that niche stability in environmental space was greatest for (sub)polar species, with greatest expansion of the niche observed for tropical species. We find that globally calibrated ENMs showed good predictions of species occurrences globally, whereas models calibrated in either the Pacific or Atlantic Oceans only and then projected globally performed less well for T. sacculifer. Our results support the assumption of environmental niche stability over the last ~21,000 years for most of our focal planktic foraminiferal species and thus, the application of transfer function techniques for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction during this interval. However, the lower observed niche stability for (sub)tropical taxa T. sacculifer and G. ruber (pink) suggests that (sub)tropical temperatures could be underestimated in the glacial ocean with the strongest effect in the equatorial Atlantic where both species are found today.
title Quantifying the stability of planktic foraminiferal physical niches
topic File content; File format; File name; File size; Uniform resource locator/link to file
url https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.871284