Cover Image

X-ray fluorescence comparison between conventional XRF (University of Edinburgh) and XRF core-scanner (Texas A&M University) from IODP hole 359-U1467

Fuente: PANGAEA

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Kunkelova, Tereza, Jung, Simon J A, de Leau, Erica S, Odling, Nick, Thomas, Alex L, Betzler, Christian, Eberli, Gregor P, Alvarez-Zarikian, Carlos A, Alonso-Garcia, Montserrat, Bialik, Or M, Blättler, Clara L, Guo, Junhua Adam, Haffen, Sébastien, Horozal, Senay, Mee, Laurence, Inoue, Mayuri, Jovane, Luigi, Lanci, Luca, Laya, Juan Carlos, Lüdmann, Thomas, Bejugam, Nagender N, Nakakuni, Masatoshi, Niino, Hiroshi, Petruny, Loren M, Pratiwi, Santi D, Reijmer, John J G, Reolid, Jesus, Slagle, Angela L, Sloss, Craig, Su, Xiang, Swart, Peter K, Wright, James D, Yao, Zhengquan, Young, J R, Lindhorst, Sebastian, Stainbank, Stephanie, Rueggeberg, Andres, Spezzaferri, Silvia, Carrasqueira, Igor, Yu, Siyao M, Kroon, Dick
Format:	Dataset Open Access
Language:	en
Published:	PANGAEA 2019
Subjects:	359-U1467; CDRILL; Core drilling; DEPTH, sediment/rock; Exp359; Integrated Ocean Drilling Program / International Ocean Discovery Program; IODP; Iron/Potassium ratio; Joides Resolution; Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research; MAL-9A; Maldives; X-ray fluorescence spectrometry; ZMT
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Internet

https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.897947