Experiment on impacts of ocean warming and biotic stress in a coastal seaweed ecosystem

Fuente: PANGAEA
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wahl, Martin, Werner, Franziska Julie, Buchholz, Björn, Raddatz, Stefanie, Graiff, Angelika, Matthiessen, Birte, Karsten, Ulf, Hiebenthal, Claas, Hamer, Jorin, Ito, Maysa, Gülzow, Elisa, Rilov, Gil, Guy-Haim, Tamar
Formato: Dataset Open Access
Lenguaje:en
Publicado: PANGAEA 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1867168572594192384
author Wahl, Martin
Werner, Franziska Julie
Buchholz, Björn
Raddatz, Stefanie
Graiff, Angelika
Matthiessen, Birte
Karsten, Ulf
Hiebenthal, Claas
Hamer, Jorin
Ito, Maysa
Gülzow, Elisa
Rilov, Gil
Guy-Haim, Tamar
author_facet Wahl, Martin
Werner, Franziska Julie
Buchholz, Björn
Raddatz, Stefanie
Graiff, Angelika
Matthiessen, Birte
Karsten, Ulf
Hiebenthal, Claas
Hamer, Jorin
Ito, Maysa
Gülzow, Elisa
Rilov, Gil
Guy-Haim, Tamar
collection Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales
contents The plea for using more “realistic,” community‐level, investigations to assess the ecological impacts of global change has recently intensified. Such experiments are typically more complex, longer, more expensive, and harder to interpret than simple organism‐level benchtop experiments. Are they worth the extra effort? Using outdoor mesocosms, we investigated the effects of ocean warming (OW) and acidification (OA), their combination (OAW), and their natural fluctuations on coastal communities of the western Baltic Sea during all four seasons. These communities are dominated by the perennial and canopy‐forming macrophyte Fucus vesiculosus—an important ecosystem engineer Baltic‐wide. We, additionally, assessed the direct response of organisms to temperature and pH in benchtop experiments, and examined how well organism‐level responses can predict community‐level responses to the dominant driver, OW. OW affected the mesocosm communities substantially stronger than acidification. OW provoked structural and functional shifts in the community that differed in strength and direction among seasons. The organism‐level response to OW matched well the community‐level response of a given species only under warm and cold thermal stress, that is, in summer and winter. In other seasons, shifts in biotic interactions masked the direct OW effects. The combination of direct OW effects and OW‐driven shifts of biotic interactions is likely to jeopardize the future of the habitat‐forming macroalga F. vesiculosus in the Baltic Sea. Furthermore, we conclude that seasonal mesocosm experiments are essential for our understanding of global change impact because they take into account the important fluctuations of abiotic and biotic pressures.
format Dataset Open Access
id pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_906912
institution PANGAEA
language en
publishDate 2019
publisher PANGAEA
record_format pangaea
spellingShingle Experiment on impacts of ocean warming and biotic stress in a coastal seaweed ecosystem
Wahl, Martin
Werner, Franziska Julie
Buchholz, Björn
Raddatz, Stefanie
Graiff, Angelika
Matthiessen, Birte
Karsten, Ulf
Hiebenthal, Claas
Hamer, Jorin
Ito, Maysa
Gülzow, Elisa
Rilov, Gil
Guy-Haim, Tamar
BIOACID; Biological Impacts of Ocean Acidification
The plea for using more “realistic,” community‐level, investigations to assess the ecological impacts of global change has recently intensified. Such experiments are typically more complex, longer, more expensive, and harder to interpret than simple organism‐level benchtop experiments. Are they worth the extra effort? Using outdoor mesocosms, we investigated the effects of ocean warming (OW) and acidification (OA), their combination (OAW), and their natural fluctuations on coastal communities of the western Baltic Sea during all four seasons. These communities are dominated by the perennial and canopy‐forming macrophyte Fucus vesiculosus—an important ecosystem engineer Baltic‐wide. We, additionally, assessed the direct response of organisms to temperature and pH in benchtop experiments, and examined how well organism‐level responses can predict community‐level responses to the dominant driver, OW. OW affected the mesocosm communities substantially stronger than acidification. OW provoked structural and functional shifts in the community that differed in strength and direction among seasons. The organism‐level response to OW matched well the community‐level response of a given species only under warm and cold thermal stress, that is, in summer and winter. In other seasons, shifts in biotic interactions masked the direct OW effects. The combination of direct OW effects and OW‐driven shifts of biotic interactions is likely to jeopardize the future of the habitat‐forming macroalga F. vesiculosus in the Baltic Sea. Furthermore, we conclude that seasonal mesocosm experiments are essential for our understanding of global change impact because they take into account the important fluctuations of abiotic and biotic pressures.
title Experiment on impacts of ocean warming and biotic stress in a coastal seaweed ecosystem
topic BIOACID; Biological Impacts of Ocean Acidification
url https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.906912