Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zielinski, Oliver, Meier, Daniela, Kleyer, Michael, Hillebrand, Helmut
Format: Dataset Open Access
Language:en
Published: PANGAEA 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.912896
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867167677700636672
author Zielinski, Oliver
Meier, Daniela
Kleyer, Michael
Hillebrand, Helmut
author_facet Zielinski, Oliver
Meier, Daniela
Kleyer, Michael
Hillebrand, Helmut
collection Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales
contents Data presented here were collected between April 2017 to December 2018 within the BEFmate project (Biodiversity - Ecosystem Functioning across marine and terrestrial ecosystems, https://uol.de/icbm/verbundprojekte/abgeschlossene-projekte/befmate/ ) of the Universities of Oldenburg and Göttingen and the Nationalpark Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer. Experimental islands and saltmarsh enclosed plots were created in the back barrier tidal flat and in the saltmarsh zone of the island of Spiekeroog. Local tide and wave conditions were recorded with a RBRduo TDǀwave sensor (RBR Ltd., Ontario/Canada). The sensor was bottom mounted in a shallow tidal creek (0.71 / 0.78 m NHN) through a steel girder (buried 0.3m deep in the sediment) and was positioned 10 cm above sediment surface, as was determined by using a portable differential GPS. This resulted in the sensor falling dry during low tide. For accurate depth calculations, raw pressure data were manually corrected for atmospheric pressure derived from a locally installed weather station. The sensor was pre-calibrated by the manufacturer and the sampling rate was 3 Hz with 1024 samples per burst at a sample interval of 10 min. Recorded data were internally logged until the readout with the Ruskin (V1.13.13) software. Date and time is given in UTC. Data handling was performed according to Zielinski et al. (2018): Post-processing of collected data was done using MATLAB (R2018a). Quality control was performed by (a) erasing data covering maintenance activities, (b) removing outliers, and (c) visually checks. Low-tide data is not removed, but were easily identified through the manually calculated water depth data, where all depths < 0.05m represented low tide data.
format Dataset Open Access
id pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_912896
institution PANGAEA
language en
publishDate 2020
publisher PANGAEA
record_format pangaea
spellingShingle Continuous wave and tide observations at BEFmate artificial islands in the back-barrier tidal flat, Spiekeroog, Germany, 2017-04 to 2018-12
Zielinski, Oliver
Meier, Daniela
Kleyer, Michael
Hillebrand, Helmut
BEFmate; biodiversity - ecosystem functioning; experimental islands; ICBM; Institut für Chemie und Biologie des Meeres; salt marsh; Spiekeroog; water level; wave
Data presented here were collected between April 2017 to December 2018 within the BEFmate project (Biodiversity - Ecosystem Functioning across marine and terrestrial ecosystems, https://uol.de/icbm/verbundprojekte/abgeschlossene-projekte/befmate/ ) of the Universities of Oldenburg and Göttingen and the Nationalpark Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer. Experimental islands and saltmarsh enclosed plots were created in the back barrier tidal flat and in the saltmarsh zone of the island of Spiekeroog. Local tide and wave conditions were recorded with a RBRduo TDǀwave sensor (RBR Ltd., Ontario/Canada). The sensor was bottom mounted in a shallow tidal creek (0.71 / 0.78 m NHN) through a steel girder (buried 0.3m deep in the sediment) and was positioned 10 cm above sediment surface, as was determined by using a portable differential GPS. This resulted in the sensor falling dry during low tide. For accurate depth calculations, raw pressure data were manually corrected for atmospheric pressure derived from a locally installed weather station. The sensor was pre-calibrated by the manufacturer and the sampling rate was 3 Hz with 1024 samples per burst at a sample interval of 10 min. Recorded data were internally logged until the readout with the Ruskin (V1.13.13) software. Date and time is given in UTC. Data handling was performed according to Zielinski et al. (2018): Post-processing of collected data was done using MATLAB (R2018a). Quality control was performed by (a) erasing data covering maintenance activities, (b) removing outliers, and (c) visually checks. Low-tide data is not removed, but were easily identified through the manually calculated water depth data, where all depths < 0.05m represented low tide data.
title Continuous wave and tide observations at BEFmate artificial islands in the back-barrier tidal flat, Spiekeroog, Germany, 2017-04 to 2018-12
topic BEFmate; biodiversity - ecosystem functioning; experimental islands; ICBM; Institut für Chemie und Biologie des Meeres; salt marsh; Spiekeroog; water level; wave
url https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.912896