Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Dataset Open Access |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
PANGAEA
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.918521 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867168573127917568 |
|---|---|
| author | Meier, Daniela Thölen, Claudia Hillebrand, Helmut Kleyer, Michael Lõhmus, Kertu Zielinski, Oliver |
| author_facet | Meier, Daniela Thölen, Claudia Hillebrand, Helmut Kleyer, Michael Lõhmus, Kertu Zielinski, Oliver |
| collection | Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales |
| contents | Data presented here were collected between January 2019 to December 2019 within the research unit DynaCom (Spatial community ecology in highly dynamic landscapes: From island biogeography to metaecosystems, https://uol.de/dynacom/ ) of the Universities of Oldenburg, Göttingen, and Münster, the iDiv Leipzig and the Nationalpark Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer. Experimental islands and saltmarsh enclosed plots were created in the back barrier tidal flat and in the saltmarsh zone of the island of Spiekeroog. Local tide and wave conditions were recorded with a RBRduo TDǀwave sensor (RBR Ltd., Ontario/Canada). The sensor was bottom mounted in a shallow tidal creek (0.78 m NHN) through a steel girder (buried 0.3m deep in the sediment) and was positioned 10 cm above sediment surface, as was determined by using a portable differential GPS. This resulted in the sensor falling dry during low tide. For accurate depth calculations, raw pressure data were manually corrected for atmospheric pressure derived from a locally installed weather station. The sensor was pre-calibrated by the manufacturer and the sampling rate was 3 Hz with 1024 samples per burst at a sample interval of 10 min. Recorded data were internally logged until the readout with the Ruskin (V1.13.13) software. Date and time is given in UTC. Data handling was performed according to Zielinski et al. (2018): Post-processing of collected data was done using MATLAB (R2018a). Quality control was performed by (a) erasing data covering maintenance activities, (b) removing outliers, and (c) visually checks. Low-tide data is not removed, but were easily identified through the manually calculated water depth data, where all depths < 0.05m represented low tide data. |
| format | Dataset Open Access |
| id | pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_918521 |
| institution | PANGAEA |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | PANGAEA |
| record_format | pangaea |
| spellingShingle | Continuous wave and tide observations at DynaCom artificial islands in the back-barrier tidal flat, Spiekeroog, Germany, 2019-01 to 2019-12 Meier, Daniela Thölen, Claudia Hillebrand, Helmut Kleyer, Michael Lõhmus, Kertu Zielinski, Oliver BEFmate; biodiversity - ecosystem functioning; DynaCom; experimental islands; FOR 2716: Spatial community ecology in highly dynamic landscapes: from island biogeography to metaecosystems; ICBM; Institut für Chemie und Biologie des Meeres; Metacommunity; salt marsh; Spiekeroog; water level; wave Data presented here were collected between January 2019 to December 2019 within the research unit DynaCom (Spatial community ecology in highly dynamic landscapes: From island biogeography to metaecosystems, https://uol.de/dynacom/ ) of the Universities of Oldenburg, Göttingen, and Münster, the iDiv Leipzig and the Nationalpark Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer. Experimental islands and saltmarsh enclosed plots were created in the back barrier tidal flat and in the saltmarsh zone of the island of Spiekeroog. Local tide and wave conditions were recorded with a RBRduo TDǀwave sensor (RBR Ltd., Ontario/Canada). The sensor was bottom mounted in a shallow tidal creek (0.78 m NHN) through a steel girder (buried 0.3m deep in the sediment) and was positioned 10 cm above sediment surface, as was determined by using a portable differential GPS. This resulted in the sensor falling dry during low tide. For accurate depth calculations, raw pressure data were manually corrected for atmospheric pressure derived from a locally installed weather station. The sensor was pre-calibrated by the manufacturer and the sampling rate was 3 Hz with 1024 samples per burst at a sample interval of 10 min. Recorded data were internally logged until the readout with the Ruskin (V1.13.13) software. Date and time is given in UTC. Data handling was performed according to Zielinski et al. (2018): Post-processing of collected data was done using MATLAB (R2018a). Quality control was performed by (a) erasing data covering maintenance activities, (b) removing outliers, and (c) visually checks. Low-tide data is not removed, but were easily identified through the manually calculated water depth data, where all depths < 0.05m represented low tide data. |
| title | Continuous wave and tide observations at DynaCom artificial islands in the back-barrier tidal flat, Spiekeroog, Germany, 2019-01 to 2019-12 |
| topic | BEFmate; biodiversity - ecosystem functioning; DynaCom; experimental islands; FOR 2716: Spatial community ecology in highly dynamic landscapes: from island biogeography to metaecosystems; ICBM; Institut für Chemie und Biologie des Meeres; Metacommunity; salt marsh; Spiekeroog; water level; wave |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.918521 |