Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Dataset Open Access |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
PANGAEA
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.943672 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867168505664634880 |
|---|---|
| author | Pröfrock, Daniel Zimmermann, Tristan Irrgeher, Johanna Pieper, Andrea Erbslöh, Hans-Burkhard Dutschke, Florian |
| author_facet | Pröfrock, Daniel Zimmermann, Tristan Irrgeher, Johanna Pieper, Andrea Erbslöh, Hans-Burkhard Dutschke, Florian |
| collection | Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales |
| contents | In order to understand and map the complex mass transport pathways and possible transformation processes of contaminants in coastal regions such as the German Bight, the main contributors must be identified and evaluated. In this context, rivers represent a major input source. In the framework of a river campaign from 20.06.16 till 25.06.2016, sediment and freshwater samples of the Ems and its tributaries were taken to determine their elemental and isotopic fingerprint and to investigate possible inputs into the German Bight. At every sampling station physicochemical parameters of the water column were measured directly after sampling with respective probes of a multimeter covering pH, dissolved oxygen, temperature and conductivity. |
| format | Dataset Open Access |
| id | pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_943672 |
| institution | PANGAEA |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | PANGAEA |
| record_format | pangaea |
| spellingShingle | Grain size distribution for the sediment sample stations of the Ems river campaign 2016 Pröfrock, Daniel Zimmermann, Tristan Irrgeher, Johanna Pieper, Andrea Erbslöh, Hans-Burkhard Dutschke, Florian DEPTH, sediment/rock; EM2016_Stat_1_2; EM2016_Stat_10_2; EM2016_Stat_11_2; EM2016_Stat_12_2; EM2016_Stat_13_2; EM2016_Stat_14_2; EM2016_Stat_15_2; EM2016_Stat_16_2; EM2016_Stat_17_2; EM2016_Stat_18_2; EM2016_Stat_19_2; EM2016_Stat_2_2; EM2016_Stat_20_2; EM2016_Stat_21_2; EM2016_Stat_22_2; EM2016_Stat_23_2; EM2016_Stat_24_2; EM2016_Stat_25_2; EM2016_Stat_26_2; EM2016_Stat_27_2; EM2016_Stat_3_2; EM2016_Stat_4_2; EM2016_Stat_5_2; EM2016_Stat_6_2; EM2016_Stat_7_2; EM2016_Stat_8_2; EM2016_Stat_9_2; EMS_2016; Ems_S_01; Ems_S_02; Ems_S_03; Ems_S_04; Ems_S_05; Ems_S_06; Ems_S_07; Ems_S_08; Ems_S_09; Ems_S_10; Ems_S_11; Ems_S_12; Ems_S_13; Ems_S_14; Ems_S_15; Ems_S_16; Ems_S_17; Ems_S_18; Ems_S_19; Ems_S_20; Ems_S_21; Ems_S_22; Ems_S_23; Ems_S_24; Ems_S_25; Ems_S_26; Ems_S_27; Ems, Germany, Europe; Event label; Grain size, LASER Particle Sizer; Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon; Hereon; Sample code/label; Size fraction < 0.020 mm; Size fraction < 0.020 mm, standard deviation; Size fraction < 0.063 mm, mud, silt+clay; Size fraction < 0.063 mm, mud, silt+clay, standard deviation; Size fraction < 0.125 mm; Size fraction < 0.125 mm, standard deviation; Size fraction < 0.250 mm; Size fraction < 0.250 mm, standard deviation; Station label; van Veen Grab; VGRAB In order to understand and map the complex mass transport pathways and possible transformation processes of contaminants in coastal regions such as the German Bight, the main contributors must be identified and evaluated. In this context, rivers represent a major input source. In the framework of a river campaign from 20.06.16 till 25.06.2016, sediment and freshwater samples of the Ems and its tributaries were taken to determine their elemental and isotopic fingerprint and to investigate possible inputs into the German Bight. At every sampling station physicochemical parameters of the water column were measured directly after sampling with respective probes of a multimeter covering pH, dissolved oxygen, temperature and conductivity. |
| title | Grain size distribution for the sediment sample stations of the Ems river campaign 2016 |
| topic | DEPTH, sediment/rock; EM2016_Stat_1_2; EM2016_Stat_10_2; EM2016_Stat_11_2; EM2016_Stat_12_2; EM2016_Stat_13_2; EM2016_Stat_14_2; EM2016_Stat_15_2; EM2016_Stat_16_2; EM2016_Stat_17_2; EM2016_Stat_18_2; EM2016_Stat_19_2; EM2016_Stat_2_2; EM2016_Stat_20_2; EM2016_Stat_21_2; EM2016_Stat_22_2; EM2016_Stat_23_2; EM2016_Stat_24_2; EM2016_Stat_25_2; EM2016_Stat_26_2; EM2016_Stat_27_2; EM2016_Stat_3_2; EM2016_Stat_4_2; EM2016_Stat_5_2; EM2016_Stat_6_2; EM2016_Stat_7_2; EM2016_Stat_8_2; EM2016_Stat_9_2; EMS_2016; Ems_S_01; Ems_S_02; Ems_S_03; Ems_S_04; Ems_S_05; Ems_S_06; Ems_S_07; Ems_S_08; Ems_S_09; Ems_S_10; Ems_S_11; Ems_S_12; Ems_S_13; Ems_S_14; Ems_S_15; Ems_S_16; Ems_S_17; Ems_S_18; Ems_S_19; Ems_S_20; Ems_S_21; Ems_S_22; Ems_S_23; Ems_S_24; Ems_S_25; Ems_S_26; Ems_S_27; Ems, Germany, Europe; Event label; Grain size, LASER Particle Sizer; Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon; Hereon; Sample code/label; Size fraction < 0.020 mm; Size fraction < 0.020 mm, standard deviation; Size fraction < 0.063 mm, mud, silt+clay; Size fraction < 0.063 mm, mud, silt+clay, standard deviation; Size fraction < 0.125 mm; Size fraction < 0.125 mm, standard deviation; Size fraction < 0.250 mm; Size fraction < 0.250 mm, standard deviation; Station label; van Veen Grab; VGRAB |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.943672 |