Morphometric parameters of the Coral Belt Mounds (CBM), Namibian coral mound province
Fuente:
PANGAEA
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Dataset Open Access |
| Lenguaje: | en |
| Publicado: |
PANGAEA
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1867168216071012352 |
|---|---|
| author | Tamborrino, Leonardo Purkis, Sam Hebbeln, Dierk |
| author_facet | Tamborrino, Leonardo Purkis, Sam Hebbeln, Dierk |
| collection | Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales |
| contents | Quantitative morphometric analyses were carried out for each mound following the workflows presented by Purkis et al. (2007) The coral mound base was defined following the methodological approach of Correa et al. (2012) using the dip angle map, generated from the digital elevation model (DEM), to extract closed polygons that follow the 3°-contour line. This 3°-cutoff has been qualitatively validated with a comparison between the DEM and the dip angle. Small-scaled polygons within mound perimeters and resulting from bathymetry artefacts were filtered out. Manual editing was applied to split simple merged mound structures (e.g. twin-peak mounds) based on higher cut-off slope values (4-5°). Furthermore, polygons describing the mound footprint have been corrected to remove unrealistic shapes especially common for the CBM. The DEM was subsequently re-gridded to generate hypothetical bathymetric maps without mounds, for which the vertical relief beneath each removed mound was interpolated from the mound perimeters. The newly interpolated surfaces were then subtracted from the original DEMs to evaluate the volume and heights of the coral mounds. Only features with a footprint area greater than 900 suared meters (corresponding to a two-dimensional array of 3 × 3 DEM grid cells) and with a height of >2 m above the surrounding seafloor (4 × 0.5 m of vertical precision) were considered as coral mounds and quantitatively analyzed. |
| format | Dataset Open Access |
| id | pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_944595 |
| institution | PANGAEA |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | PANGAEA |
| record_format | pangaea |
| spellingShingle | Morphometric parameters of the Coral Belt Mounds (CBM), Namibian coral mound province Tamborrino, Leonardo Purkis, Sam Hebbeln, Dierk 3D relief of the coral mound; 3D relief of the coral mound/coral mound footprint polygon; Bounding area; Circular variance; Cold-water coral; Compactness; Convexity; coral mounds; Depth, bottom/max; Depth, difference; Depth, median; Depth, mode; Depth, top/min; DEPTH, water; Dimension, fractal; Direction; Direction of principal axis; Distance from nearest polygon; ELEVATION; Elevation, standard deviation; EM1002; EM1002 multibeam echosounder; Fractal Span; GeoB20502-1; GeoB20509-1; GeoB20526-1; GeoB20532-1; GeoB20546-1; GeoB20558-1; GeoB20562-1; GeoB20570-1; GeoB20580-1; Grab; GRAB; Height of mound; Identification; LATITUDE; Length of axis ortoghonal to PAX; Length of principal axis; LONGITUDE; Lophelia pertusa; M122; M122_004-1; M122_021-1; M122_027-1; M122_041-1; M122_053-1; M122_057-1; M122_065-1; M122_075-1; M122_1348-1; Maria S. Merian; MB_PS; Meteor (1986); Morphometry; Mound footprint polygon; Mound height/PAX length ratio; MSM20/014-4-2; MSM20/1; MSM20/1_0_Underway-2; Multibeam/Parasound; Nearest polygon identification number; Net area; Number of nodes; Parameter; Perimeter; Principal axes ratio; Ratio between 3D surface and planar surface; Slope; Slope, average, underlying; Slope, average, underlying standard deviation; Slope, maximum underlying; Slope, standard deviation; Slope angle; Volume; WALPASS Quantitative morphometric analyses were carried out for each mound following the workflows presented by Purkis et al. (2007) The coral mound base was defined following the methodological approach of Correa et al. (2012) using the dip angle map, generated from the digital elevation model (DEM), to extract closed polygons that follow the 3°-contour line. This 3°-cutoff has been qualitatively validated with a comparison between the DEM and the dip angle. Small-scaled polygons within mound perimeters and resulting from bathymetry artefacts were filtered out. Manual editing was applied to split simple merged mound structures (e.g. twin-peak mounds) based on higher cut-off slope values (4-5°). Furthermore, polygons describing the mound footprint have been corrected to remove unrealistic shapes especially common for the CBM. The DEM was subsequently re-gridded to generate hypothetical bathymetric maps without mounds, for which the vertical relief beneath each removed mound was interpolated from the mound perimeters. The newly interpolated surfaces were then subtracted from the original DEMs to evaluate the volume and heights of the coral mounds. Only features with a footprint area greater than 900 suared meters (corresponding to a two-dimensional array of 3 × 3 DEM grid cells) and with a height of >2 m above the surrounding seafloor (4 × 0.5 m of vertical precision) were considered as coral mounds and quantitatively analyzed. |
| title | Morphometric parameters of the Coral Belt Mounds (CBM), Namibian coral mound province |
| topic | 3D relief of the coral mound; 3D relief of the coral mound/coral mound footprint polygon; Bounding area; Circular variance; Cold-water coral; Compactness; Convexity; coral mounds; Depth, bottom/max; Depth, difference; Depth, median; Depth, mode; Depth, top/min; DEPTH, water; Dimension, fractal; Direction; Direction of principal axis; Distance from nearest polygon; ELEVATION; Elevation, standard deviation; EM1002; EM1002 multibeam echosounder; Fractal Span; GeoB20502-1; GeoB20509-1; GeoB20526-1; GeoB20532-1; GeoB20546-1; GeoB20558-1; GeoB20562-1; GeoB20570-1; GeoB20580-1; Grab; GRAB; Height of mound; Identification; LATITUDE; Length of axis ortoghonal to PAX; Length of principal axis; LONGITUDE; Lophelia pertusa; M122; M122_004-1; M122_021-1; M122_027-1; M122_041-1; M122_053-1; M122_057-1; M122_065-1; M122_075-1; M122_1348-1; Maria S. Merian; MB_PS; Meteor (1986); Morphometry; Mound footprint polygon; Mound height/PAX length ratio; MSM20/014-4-2; MSM20/1; MSM20/1_0_Underway-2; Multibeam/Parasound; Nearest polygon identification number; Net area; Number of nodes; Parameter; Perimeter; Principal axes ratio; Ratio between 3D surface and planar surface; Slope; Slope, average, underlying; Slope, average, underlying standard deviation; Slope, maximum underlying; Slope, standard deviation; Slope angle; Volume; WALPASS |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.944595 |