Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li, Ziye, Zhang, Yi Ge, Torres, Mark A, Mills, Benjamin J W
Format: Dataset Open Access
Language:en
Published: PANGAEA 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.950679
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867171882090889216
author Li, Ziye
Zhang, Yi Ge
Torres, Mark A
Mills, Benjamin J W
author_facet Li, Ziye
Zhang, Yi Ge
Torres, Mark A
Mills, Benjamin J W
collection Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales
contents This dataset contains the calculation process of global organic carbon burial fluxes over the Neogene (23.0-2.6 Ma) period. The calculation involves a series of consecutive steps. First, we screened 1508 sites from the Deep Sea Drilling Program (DSDP, Leg 1-96), Ocean Drilling Program (Leg 100-210), Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP, Exp 301-312), and International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP, Exp 317-363). Out of the 1508 sites, 81 sites were identified with available total organic carbon concentrations (TOC%), dry bulk density, and age model datums covering most of the past 23 million years. The mass accumulation rates (MARs) of organic carbon (OC) were calculated for each site based on sedimentation rate, bulk density, and TOC%, and were used to determine the spatial and temporal variability of OC burial in the Neogene. Given the inherent bias introduced by any such division, we employed three different subdivision strategies and compared the results to assess the uncertainty of our global reconstruction. To evaluate the potential impact of the Sadler Effect on our reconstruction, we compared the averaging interval (duration of time between tie-points in an age model), sedimentation accumulation, and OC burial for each record to determine the potential for spuriously patterns to arise in our global OC burial flux reconstruction. Also, we compare our global OC burial flux reconstruction with existing forward models of Neogene biogeochemical cycles, as well as include our reconstruction as a forcing in new forward and inverse model runs. This model-data comparison was used to test the accuracy of existing numerical models and to provide insights into observed changes in Neogene climate, atmospheric composition (pCO2), and global erosion/sediment burial rates.
format Dataset Open Access
id pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_950679
institution PANGAEA
language en
publishDate 2022
publisher PANGAEA
record_format pangaea
spellingShingle Neogene burial of organic carbon in the global ocean
Li, Ziye
Zhang, Yi Ge
Torres, Mark A
Mills, Benjamin J W
Carbon cycle; Deep Sea Drilling Project; DSDP; File content; Integrated Ocean Drilling Program / International Ocean Discovery Program; IODP; IODP/ODP/DSDP sites; Miocene; Monterey Hypothesis; Ocean Drilling Program; ODP; Office Open XML Workbook; Organic carbon (OC) burial
This dataset contains the calculation process of global organic carbon burial fluxes over the Neogene (23.0-2.6 Ma) period. The calculation involves a series of consecutive steps. First, we screened 1508 sites from the Deep Sea Drilling Program (DSDP, Leg 1-96), Ocean Drilling Program (Leg 100-210), Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP, Exp 301-312), and International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP, Exp 317-363). Out of the 1508 sites, 81 sites were identified with available total organic carbon concentrations (TOC%), dry bulk density, and age model datums covering most of the past 23 million years. The mass accumulation rates (MARs) of organic carbon (OC) were calculated for each site based on sedimentation rate, bulk density, and TOC%, and were used to determine the spatial and temporal variability of OC burial in the Neogene. Given the inherent bias introduced by any such division, we employed three different subdivision strategies and compared the results to assess the uncertainty of our global reconstruction. To evaluate the potential impact of the Sadler Effect on our reconstruction, we compared the averaging interval (duration of time between tie-points in an age model), sedimentation accumulation, and OC burial for each record to determine the potential for spuriously patterns to arise in our global OC burial flux reconstruction. Also, we compare our global OC burial flux reconstruction with existing forward models of Neogene biogeochemical cycles, as well as include our reconstruction as a forcing in new forward and inverse model runs. This model-data comparison was used to test the accuracy of existing numerical models and to provide insights into observed changes in Neogene climate, atmospheric composition (pCO2), and global erosion/sediment burial rates.
title Neogene burial of organic carbon in the global ocean
topic Carbon cycle; Deep Sea Drilling Project; DSDP; File content; Integrated Ocean Drilling Program / International Ocean Discovery Program; IODP; IODP/ODP/DSDP sites; Miocene; Monterey Hypothesis; Ocean Drilling Program; ODP; Office Open XML Workbook; Organic carbon (OC) burial
url https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.950679