Coccolith species abundances in ODP Hole 162-984C from the subpolar North Atlantic Ocean for the past 24 ka

Fuente: PANGAEA
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Baumann, Karl-Heinz
Format: Dataset Open Access
Sprache:en
Veröffentlicht: PANGAEA 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1867171329355022336
author Baumann, Karl-Heinz
author_facet Baumann, Karl-Heinz
collection Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales
contents Coccolithophore assemblage data from sediment core 162-984C from the subpolar North Atlantic ocean spanning the past 24 ka. The assemblage data were used to assess changes in biodiversity and assemblage composition during the past 24 ka, i.e., from the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) to the current warm period covering the last deglaciation. Samples were analysed at 2-32 cm intervals and were prepared using a combined dilution/filtering technique as described by Andruleit (1996, doi:10.2307/1485964). Between 50 and 150 mg of dry bulk sediment was brought into suspension using demineralized water buffered with ammonia (pH ~ 8.5-9). The suspension was ultrasonicated for 15 to 30 s, split (split factor = 100) using a rotary splitter and filtered onto polycarbonate membrane filters (0.4 µm pore size) using a vacuum pump. Samples were dried at 40°C for 24 h before ~1x1 cm filter aliquots were mounted on an aluminium stub that was prepared with electroconductive, self-adhesive, carbon-based discs (PLANO Leit tabs). The mounted samples were sputtered with gold/palladium in a Polaron SC7640 Sputter Coater. Coccolith counts (N) were made manually using a Zeiss DSM 940A scanning electron microscope at 3,000x and 5,000x magnification. Where possible, a minimum of 300 coccoliths were counted. In some samples fewer coccoliths were counted due to very low abundances in the LGM. Sample mass (m), magnification, split factor (k) and the area of the scanned transect (A) and the filter (F) are given for all samples to allow calculation of the concentration of coccoliths per gram of dry bulk sediment, which was calculated using: (F*N)/(k*A*m). Coccolithophore taxonomy follows Young et al. (2003, doi:10.58998/jnr2297). Species not reported in the data are assumed to be absent (that is, zero abundance). Two subspecies of Calcidiscus leptoporus were distinguished: Calcidiscus leptoporus subsp. quadriperforatus and Calcidiscus leptoporus subsp. leptoporus. The ladder was further subdivided into small (< 5 µm) and larger (>= 5 µm) specimens. Furthermore, two subspecies of Coccolithus pelagicus were distinguished: Coccolithus pelagicus subsp. braarudii and Coccolithus pelagicus subsp. pelagicus. Counts of unidentified specimens are given. The chronology of the time series presented here is the revised age model included in the PALMOD 130k marine palaeoclimate data synthesis V1.1 (Jonkers et al., 2020, doi:10.5194/essd-12-1053-2020). It is based on radiocarbon ages measured on the planktonic foraminifera G. bulloides and N. pachyderma as well as tephra layers and benthic foraminifera δ18O isotope data calibrated to regional benthic foraminifera δ18O stacks (Lisiecki and Stern, 2016, doi:10.1002/2016pa003002).
format Dataset Open Access
id pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_963219
institution PANGAEA
language en
publishDate 2024
publisher PANGAEA
record_format pangaea
spellingShingle Coccolith species abundances in ODP Hole 162-984C from the subpolar North Atlantic Ocean for the past 24 ka
Baumann, Karl-Heinz
162-984C; Acanthoica quattrospina; AGE; Algirosphaera robusta; Assemblages; Calcidiscus leptoporus ssp. leptoporus; Calcidiscus leptoporus ssp. quadriperforatus; Calciosolenia brasiliensis; coccolith abundances; Coccolithophores; Coccoliths indeterminata; Coccoliths indeterminata, per unit sediment mass; Coccolithus pelagicus ssp. braarudii; Coccolithus pelagicus ssp. pelagicus; Coronosphaera mediterranea; DEPTH, sediment/rock; DRILL; Drilling/drill rig; DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation; Emiliania huxleyi; Filter, area; Florisphaera profunda; Frame width; Gephyrocapsa ericsonii; Gephyrocapsa muellerae; Gephyrocapsa oceanica; Gladiolithus flabellatus; Hayaster perplexus; Helicosphaera carteri; Helicosphaera wallichii; IODP Depth Scale Terminology; Joides Resolution; Leg162; Magnification; North Atlantic; North Atlantic Ocean; ODP; Oolithotus antillarum; Oolithotus fragilis; Ophiaster hydroideus; Papposphaera spp.; Pontosphaera discopora; Pontosphaera spp.; Reticulofenestra sessilis; Rhabdosphaera clavigera; Sample code/label; Sample mass; Scanned area; Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Zeiss, DSM 940A; Split factor; Syracosphaera pulchra; Syracosphaera sp.; Transect length; Umbellosphaera irregularis; Umbellosphaera sp.; Umbellosphaera tenuis; Umbilicosphaera foliosa; Umbilicosphaera hulburtiana; Umbilicosphaera sibogae
Coccolithophore assemblage data from sediment core 162-984C from the subpolar North Atlantic ocean spanning the past 24 ka. The assemblage data were used to assess changes in biodiversity and assemblage composition during the past 24 ka, i.e., from the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) to the current warm period covering the last deglaciation. Samples were analysed at 2-32 cm intervals and were prepared using a combined dilution/filtering technique as described by Andruleit (1996, doi:10.2307/1485964). Between 50 and 150 mg of dry bulk sediment was brought into suspension using demineralized water buffered with ammonia (pH ~ 8.5-9). The suspension was ultrasonicated for 15 to 30 s, split (split factor = 100) using a rotary splitter and filtered onto polycarbonate membrane filters (0.4 µm pore size) using a vacuum pump. Samples were dried at 40°C for 24 h before ~1x1 cm filter aliquots were mounted on an aluminium stub that was prepared with electroconductive, self-adhesive, carbon-based discs (PLANO Leit tabs). The mounted samples were sputtered with gold/palladium in a Polaron SC7640 Sputter Coater. Coccolith counts (N) were made manually using a Zeiss DSM 940A scanning electron microscope at 3,000x and 5,000x magnification. Where possible, a minimum of 300 coccoliths were counted. In some samples fewer coccoliths were counted due to very low abundances in the LGM. Sample mass (m), magnification, split factor (k) and the area of the scanned transect (A) and the filter (F) are given for all samples to allow calculation of the concentration of coccoliths per gram of dry bulk sediment, which was calculated using: (F*N)/(k*A*m). Coccolithophore taxonomy follows Young et al. (2003, doi:10.58998/jnr2297). Species not reported in the data are assumed to be absent (that is, zero abundance). Two subspecies of Calcidiscus leptoporus were distinguished: Calcidiscus leptoporus subsp. quadriperforatus and Calcidiscus leptoporus subsp. leptoporus. The ladder was further subdivided into small (< 5 µm) and larger (>= 5 µm) specimens. Furthermore, two subspecies of Coccolithus pelagicus were distinguished: Coccolithus pelagicus subsp. braarudii and Coccolithus pelagicus subsp. pelagicus. Counts of unidentified specimens are given. The chronology of the time series presented here is the revised age model included in the PALMOD 130k marine palaeoclimate data synthesis V1.1 (Jonkers et al., 2020, doi:10.5194/essd-12-1053-2020). It is based on radiocarbon ages measured on the planktonic foraminifera G. bulloides and N. pachyderma as well as tephra layers and benthic foraminifera δ18O isotope data calibrated to regional benthic foraminifera δ18O stacks (Lisiecki and Stern, 2016, doi:10.1002/2016pa003002).
title Coccolith species abundances in ODP Hole 162-984C from the subpolar North Atlantic Ocean for the past 24 ka
topic 162-984C; Acanthoica quattrospina; AGE; Algirosphaera robusta; Assemblages; Calcidiscus leptoporus ssp. leptoporus; Calcidiscus leptoporus ssp. quadriperforatus; Calciosolenia brasiliensis; coccolith abundances; Coccolithophores; Coccoliths indeterminata; Coccoliths indeterminata, per unit sediment mass; Coccolithus pelagicus ssp. braarudii; Coccolithus pelagicus ssp. pelagicus; Coronosphaera mediterranea; DEPTH, sediment/rock; DRILL; Drilling/drill rig; DSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation; Emiliania huxleyi; Filter, area; Florisphaera profunda; Frame width; Gephyrocapsa ericsonii; Gephyrocapsa muellerae; Gephyrocapsa oceanica; Gladiolithus flabellatus; Hayaster perplexus; Helicosphaera carteri; Helicosphaera wallichii; IODP Depth Scale Terminology; Joides Resolution; Leg162; Magnification; North Atlantic; North Atlantic Ocean; ODP; Oolithotus antillarum; Oolithotus fragilis; Ophiaster hydroideus; Papposphaera spp.; Pontosphaera discopora; Pontosphaera spp.; Reticulofenestra sessilis; Rhabdosphaera clavigera; Sample code/label; Sample mass; Scanned area; Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Zeiss, DSM 940A; Split factor; Syracosphaera pulchra; Syracosphaera sp.; Transect length; Umbellosphaera irregularis; Umbellosphaera sp.; Umbellosphaera tenuis; Umbilicosphaera foliosa; Umbilicosphaera hulburtiana; Umbilicosphaera sibogae
url https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.963219