Coccolith species abundances in sediment core GeoB11035-1 from the NW Iberian continental margin for the past 55 ka

Fuente: PANGAEA
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baumann, Karl-Heinz, Stolz, Katharina
Format: Dataset Open Access
Language:en
Published: PANGAEA 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867169467055734784
author Baumann, Karl-Heinz
Stolz, Katharina
author_facet Baumann, Karl-Heinz
Stolz, Katharina
collection Datos científicos de ciencias marinas y ambientales
contents Coccolithophore assemblage data from sediment core GeoB11035-1 from the NW Iberian continental margin for the past 55 ka. The assemblage data were used to assess changes in biodiversity and assemblage composition during the past 24 ka, i.e., from the Last Glacial Maximum to the current warm period covering the last deglaciation. Samples were analysed at 0.5-10 cm intervals and were prepared using a combined dilution/filtering technique as described by Andruleit (1996, doi:10.2307/1485964). Between 50 and 120 mg of dry bulk sediment was brought into suspension using demineralized water buffered with ammonia (pH ~ 8.5-9). The suspension was ultrasonicated for 15 to 30 s, split (split factor = 100) using a rotary splitter and filtered onto polycarbonate membrane filters (0.4 µm pore size) using a vacuum pump. Samples were dried at 40°C for 24 h before ~1x1 cm filter aliquots were mounted on an aluminium stub that was prepared with electroconductive, self-adhesive, carbon-based discs (PLANO Leit tabs). The mounted samples were sputtered with gold/palladium in a Polaron SC7640 Sputter Coater. Coccolith counts (N) were made manually using a Zeiss DSM 940A scanning electron microscope at 3,000x magnification. Where possible, a minimum of 300 coccoliths were counted. In some samples fewer coccoliths were counted due to low abundances. Sample mass (m), magnification, split factor (k) and the area of the scanned transect (A) and the filter (F) are given for all samples to allow calculation of the concentration of coccoliths per gram of dry bulk sediment, which was calculated using: (F*N)/(k*A*m). Coccolithophore taxonomy follows Young et al. (2003, doi:10.58998/jnr2297). Species not reported in the data are assumed to be absent (that is, zero abundance). Two subspecies of Coccolithus pelagicus were distinguished: Coccolithus pelagicus susp. pelagicus and Coccolithus pelagicus susp. braarudii as well as two subspecies of Calcidiscus leptoporus: Calcidiscus leptoporus subsp. quadriperforatus and Calcidiscus leptoporus subsp. leptoporus. Calcidiscus leptoporus subsp. leptoporus was further subdivided into small (< 5 µm) and larger (>= 5 µm) specimens. Counts of unidentified and reworked specimens are given. The chronology of the time series presented here was revised using a similar approach as in the PALMOD 130k marine palaeoclimate data synthesis V1.1 (Jonkers et al., 2020, doi:10.5194/essd-12-1053-2020). It is based on radiocarbon ages measured on the planktonic foraminifera G. bulloides (>250 µm) and tie points between the Ca/Ti record with the GISP II δ18O record (Bender et al., 2012, doi:10.1007/s00367-012-0282-2).
format Dataset Open Access
id pangaea_https___doi_org_10_1594_PANGAEA_963235
institution PANGAEA
language en
publishDate 2024
publisher PANGAEA
record_format pangaea
spellingShingle Coccolith species abundances in sediment core GeoB11035-1 from the NW Iberian continental margin for the past 55 ka
Baumann, Karl-Heinz
Stolz, Katharina
Acanthoica quattrospina; AGE; Algirosphaera robusta; Assemblages; Calcidiscus leptoporus ssp. leptoporus; Calcidiscus leptoporus ssp. quadriperforatus; Calciosolenia brasiliensis; coccolith abundances; Coccolithophores; Coccoliths, reworked; Coccoliths, reworked, per unit sediment mass; Coccoliths indeterminata; Coccoliths indeterminata, per unit sediment mass; Coccolithus pelagicus ssp. braarudii; Coccolithus pelagicus ssp. pelagicus; Coronosphaera mediterranea; Depth, bottom/max; DEPTH, sediment/rock; Depth, top/min; Emiliania huxleyi; Filter, area; Florisphaera profunda; Frame width; GC; GeoB11035-1; Gephyrocapsa ericsonii; Gephyrocapsa muellerae; Gephyrocapsa oceanica; Gladiolithus flabellatus; Gravity corer; Hayaster perplexus; Helicosphaera carteri; Helicosphaera wallichii; Magnification; North Atlantic; Oolithotus antillarum; Oolithotus fragilis; Ophiaster hydroideus; Papposphaera spp.; Pontosphaera discopora; Pontosphaera spp.; POS342; Poseidon; Reticulofenestra sessilis; Rhabdosphaera clavigera; Sample mass; Scanned area; Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Zeiss, DSM 940A; Split factor; Syracosphaera pulchra; Syracosphaera sp.; Transect length; Umbellosphaera irregularis; Umbellosphaera sp.; Umbellosphaera tenuis; Umbilicosphaera foliosa; Umbilicosphaera hulburtiana; Umbilicosphaera sibogae
Coccolithophore assemblage data from sediment core GeoB11035-1 from the NW Iberian continental margin for the past 55 ka. The assemblage data were used to assess changes in biodiversity and assemblage composition during the past 24 ka, i.e., from the Last Glacial Maximum to the current warm period covering the last deglaciation. Samples were analysed at 0.5-10 cm intervals and were prepared using a combined dilution/filtering technique as described by Andruleit (1996, doi:10.2307/1485964). Between 50 and 120 mg of dry bulk sediment was brought into suspension using demineralized water buffered with ammonia (pH ~ 8.5-9). The suspension was ultrasonicated for 15 to 30 s, split (split factor = 100) using a rotary splitter and filtered onto polycarbonate membrane filters (0.4 µm pore size) using a vacuum pump. Samples were dried at 40°C for 24 h before ~1x1 cm filter aliquots were mounted on an aluminium stub that was prepared with electroconductive, self-adhesive, carbon-based discs (PLANO Leit tabs). The mounted samples were sputtered with gold/palladium in a Polaron SC7640 Sputter Coater. Coccolith counts (N) were made manually using a Zeiss DSM 940A scanning electron microscope at 3,000x magnification. Where possible, a minimum of 300 coccoliths were counted. In some samples fewer coccoliths were counted due to low abundances. Sample mass (m), magnification, split factor (k) and the area of the scanned transect (A) and the filter (F) are given for all samples to allow calculation of the concentration of coccoliths per gram of dry bulk sediment, which was calculated using: (F*N)/(k*A*m). Coccolithophore taxonomy follows Young et al. (2003, doi:10.58998/jnr2297). Species not reported in the data are assumed to be absent (that is, zero abundance). Two subspecies of Coccolithus pelagicus were distinguished: Coccolithus pelagicus susp. pelagicus and Coccolithus pelagicus susp. braarudii as well as two subspecies of Calcidiscus leptoporus: Calcidiscus leptoporus subsp. quadriperforatus and Calcidiscus leptoporus subsp. leptoporus. Calcidiscus leptoporus subsp. leptoporus was further subdivided into small (< 5 µm) and larger (>= 5 µm) specimens. Counts of unidentified and reworked specimens are given. The chronology of the time series presented here was revised using a similar approach as in the PALMOD 130k marine palaeoclimate data synthesis V1.1 (Jonkers et al., 2020, doi:10.5194/essd-12-1053-2020). It is based on radiocarbon ages measured on the planktonic foraminifera G. bulloides (>250 µm) and tie points between the Ca/Ti record with the GISP II δ18O record (Bender et al., 2012, doi:10.1007/s00367-012-0282-2).
title Coccolith species abundances in sediment core GeoB11035-1 from the NW Iberian continental margin for the past 55 ka
topic Acanthoica quattrospina; AGE; Algirosphaera robusta; Assemblages; Calcidiscus leptoporus ssp. leptoporus; Calcidiscus leptoporus ssp. quadriperforatus; Calciosolenia brasiliensis; coccolith abundances; Coccolithophores; Coccoliths, reworked; Coccoliths, reworked, per unit sediment mass; Coccoliths indeterminata; Coccoliths indeterminata, per unit sediment mass; Coccolithus pelagicus ssp. braarudii; Coccolithus pelagicus ssp. pelagicus; Coronosphaera mediterranea; Depth, bottom/max; DEPTH, sediment/rock; Depth, top/min; Emiliania huxleyi; Filter, area; Florisphaera profunda; Frame width; GC; GeoB11035-1; Gephyrocapsa ericsonii; Gephyrocapsa muellerae; Gephyrocapsa oceanica; Gladiolithus flabellatus; Gravity corer; Hayaster perplexus; Helicosphaera carteri; Helicosphaera wallichii; Magnification; North Atlantic; Oolithotus antillarum; Oolithotus fragilis; Ophiaster hydroideus; Papposphaera spp.; Pontosphaera discopora; Pontosphaera spp.; POS342; Poseidon; Reticulofenestra sessilis; Rhabdosphaera clavigera; Sample mass; Scanned area; Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Zeiss, DSM 940A; Split factor; Syracosphaera pulchra; Syracosphaera sp.; Transect length; Umbellosphaera irregularis; Umbellosphaera sp.; Umbellosphaera tenuis; Umbilicosphaera foliosa; Umbilicosphaera hulburtiana; Umbilicosphaera sibogae
url https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.963235