Recommendations on bioacoustical metrics relevant for regulating exposure to anthropogenic underwater sounda).

Fuente: PubMed
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Lucke, Klaus, MacGillivray, Alexander O, Halvorsen, Michele B, Ainslie, Michael A, Zeddies, David G, Sisneros, Joseph A
Format: Artículo científico
Langue:en
Publié: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1868266292631306241
author Lucke, Klaus
MacGillivray, Alexander O
Halvorsen, Michele B
Ainslie, Michael A
Zeddies, David G
Sisneros, Joseph A
author_facet Lucke, Klaus
MacGillivray, Alexander O
Halvorsen, Michele B
Ainslie, Michael A
Zeddies, David G
Sisneros, Joseph A
Lucke, Klaus
MacGillivray, Alexander O
Halvorsen, Michele B
Ainslie, Michael A
Zeddies, David G
Sisneros, Joseph A
collection PubMed - marine biology
contents Recommendations on bioacoustical metrics relevant for regulating exposure to anthropogenic underwater sounda). Lucke, Klaus MacGillivray, Alexander O Halvorsen, Michele B Ainslie, Michael A Zeddies, David G Sisneros, Joseph A Animals Noise Acoustics Sound Spectrography Aquatic Organisms Sound Environmental Exposure Time Factors Environmental Monitoring Water Metrics to be used in noise impact assessment must integrate the physical acoustic characteristics of the sound field with relevant biology of animals. Several metrics have been established to determine and regulate underwater noise exposure to aquatic fauna. However, recent advances in understanding cause-effect relationships indicate that additional metrics are needed to fully describe and quantify the impact of sound fields on aquatic fauna. Existing regulations have primarily focused on marine mammals and are based on the dichotomy of sound types as being either impulsive or non-impulsive. This classification of sound types, however, is overly simplistic and insufficient for adequate impact assessments of sound on animals. It is recommended that the definition of impulsiveness be refined by incorporating kurtosis as an additional parameter and applying an appropriate conversion factor. Auditory frequency weighting functions, which scale the importance of particular sound frequencies to account for an animal's sensitivity to those frequencies, should be applied. Minimum phase filters are recommended for calculating weighted sound pressure. Temporal observation windows should be reported as signal duration influences its detectability by animals. Acknowledging that auditory integration time differs across species and is frequency dependent, standardized temporal integration windows are proposed for various signal types.
format Artículo científico
id pubmed_39400268
institution PubMed
language en
publishDate 2024
publisher The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
record_format pubmed
spellingShingle Recommendations on bioacoustical metrics relevant for regulating exposure to anthropogenic underwater sounda).
Lucke, Klaus
MacGillivray, Alexander O
Halvorsen, Michele B
Ainslie, Michael A
Zeddies, David G
Sisneros, Joseph A
Animals
Noise
Acoustics
Sound Spectrography
Aquatic Organisms
Sound
Environmental Exposure
Time Factors
Environmental Monitoring
Water
Recommendations on bioacoustical metrics relevant for regulating exposure to anthropogenic underwater sounda). Lucke, Klaus MacGillivray, Alexander O Halvorsen, Michele B Ainslie, Michael A Zeddies, David G Sisneros, Joseph A Animals Noise Acoustics Sound Spectrography Aquatic Organisms Sound Environmental Exposure Time Factors Environmental Monitoring Water Metrics to be used in noise impact assessment must integrate the physical acoustic characteristics of the sound field with relevant biology of animals. Several metrics have been established to determine and regulate underwater noise exposure to aquatic fauna. However, recent advances in understanding cause-effect relationships indicate that additional metrics are needed to fully describe and quantify the impact of sound fields on aquatic fauna. Existing regulations have primarily focused on marine mammals and are based on the dichotomy of sound types as being either impulsive or non-impulsive. This classification of sound types, however, is overly simplistic and insufficient for adequate impact assessments of sound on animals. It is recommended that the definition of impulsiveness be refined by incorporating kurtosis as an additional parameter and applying an appropriate conversion factor. Auditory frequency weighting functions, which scale the importance of particular sound frequencies to account for an animal's sensitivity to those frequencies, should be applied. Minimum phase filters are recommended for calculating weighted sound pressure. Temporal observation windows should be reported as signal duration influences its detectability by animals. Acknowledging that auditory integration time differs across species and is frequency dependent, standardized temporal integration windows are proposed for various signal types.
title Recommendations on bioacoustical metrics relevant for regulating exposure to anthropogenic underwater sounda).
topic Animals
Noise
Acoustics
Sound Spectrography
Aquatic Organisms
Sound
Environmental Exposure
Time Factors
Environmental Monitoring
Water
url https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39400268/