Missing microbial eukaryotes and misleading meta-omic conclusions.

Fuente: PubMed
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Krinos, Arianna I, Mars Brisbin, Margaret, Hu, Sarah K, Cohen, Natalie R, Rynearson, Tatiana A, Follows, Michael J, Schulz, Frederik, Alexander, Harriet
Format: Artículo científico
Sprache:en
Veröffentlicht: Nature communications 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1868266280140668928
author Krinos, Arianna I
Mars Brisbin, Margaret
Hu, Sarah K
Cohen, Natalie R
Rynearson, Tatiana A
Follows, Michael J
Schulz, Frederik
Alexander, Harriet
author_facet Krinos, Arianna I
Mars Brisbin, Margaret
Hu, Sarah K
Cohen, Natalie R
Rynearson, Tatiana A
Follows, Michael J
Schulz, Frederik
Alexander, Harriet
Krinos, Arianna I
Mars Brisbin, Margaret
Hu, Sarah K
Cohen, Natalie R
Rynearson, Tatiana A
Follows, Michael J
Schulz, Frederik
Alexander, Harriet
collection PubMed - marine biology
contents Missing microbial eukaryotes and misleading meta-omic conclusions. Krinos, Arianna I Mars Brisbin, Margaret Hu, Sarah K Cohen, Natalie R Rynearson, Tatiana A Follows, Michael J Schulz, Frederik Alexander, Harriet Eukaryota Phylogeny Databases, Genetic Cluster Analysis Metagenomics Meta-omics is commonly used for large-scale analyses of microbial eukaryotes, including species or taxonomic group distribution mapping, gene catalog construction, and inference on the functional roles and activities of microbial eukaryotes in situ. Here, we explore the potential pitfalls of common approaches to taxonomic annotation of protistan meta-omic datasets. We re-analyze three environmental datasets at three levels of taxonomic hierarchy in order to illustrate the crucial importance of database completeness and curation in enabling accurate environmental interpretation. We show that taxonomic membership of sequence clusters estimates community composition more accurately than returning exact sequence labels, and overlap between clusters can address database shortcomings. Clustering approaches can be applied to diverse environments while continuing to exploit the wealth of annotation data collated in databases, and selecting and evaluating these databases is a critical part of correctly annotating protistan taxonomy in environmental datasets. We argue that ongoing curation of genetic resources is crucial in accurately annotating protists in in situ meta-omic datasets. Moreover, we propose that precise taxonomic annotation of meta-omic data is a clustering problem rather than a feasible alignment problem.
format Artículo científico
id pubmed_39543100
institution PubMed
language en
publishDate 2024
publisher Nature communications
record_format pubmed
spellingShingle Missing microbial eukaryotes and misleading meta-omic conclusions.
Krinos, Arianna I
Mars Brisbin, Margaret
Hu, Sarah K
Cohen, Natalie R
Rynearson, Tatiana A
Follows, Michael J
Schulz, Frederik
Alexander, Harriet
Eukaryota
Phylogeny
Databases, Genetic
Cluster Analysis
Metagenomics
Missing microbial eukaryotes and misleading meta-omic conclusions. Krinos, Arianna I Mars Brisbin, Margaret Hu, Sarah K Cohen, Natalie R Rynearson, Tatiana A Follows, Michael J Schulz, Frederik Alexander, Harriet Eukaryota Phylogeny Databases, Genetic Cluster Analysis Metagenomics Meta-omics is commonly used for large-scale analyses of microbial eukaryotes, including species or taxonomic group distribution mapping, gene catalog construction, and inference on the functional roles and activities of microbial eukaryotes in situ. Here, we explore the potential pitfalls of common approaches to taxonomic annotation of protistan meta-omic datasets. We re-analyze three environmental datasets at three levels of taxonomic hierarchy in order to illustrate the crucial importance of database completeness and curation in enabling accurate environmental interpretation. We show that taxonomic membership of sequence clusters estimates community composition more accurately than returning exact sequence labels, and overlap between clusters can address database shortcomings. Clustering approaches can be applied to diverse environments while continuing to exploit the wealth of annotation data collated in databases, and selecting and evaluating these databases is a critical part of correctly annotating protistan taxonomy in environmental datasets. We argue that ongoing curation of genetic resources is crucial in accurately annotating protists in in situ meta-omic datasets. Moreover, we propose that precise taxonomic annotation of meta-omic data is a clustering problem rather than a feasible alignment problem.
title Missing microbial eukaryotes and misleading meta-omic conclusions.
topic Eukaryota
Phylogeny
Databases, Genetic
Cluster Analysis
Metagenomics
url https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39543100/