Spontaneous Anthropocentric Language Use in University Students' Explanations of Biological Concepts Varies by Topic and Predicts Misconception Agreement.
Fuente:
PubMed
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
CBE life sciences education
2025
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1868266255333457920 |
|---|---|
| author | Nielson, Catie Pitt, Emma Fux, Michal Nesnera, Kristin de Betz, Nicole S Leffers, Jessica Tanner, Kimberly D Coley, John D |
| author_facet | Nielson, Catie Pitt, Emma Fux, Michal Nesnera, Kristin de Betz, Nicole S Leffers, Jessica Tanner, Kimberly D Coley, John D Nielson, Catie Pitt, Emma Fux, Michal Nesnera, Kristin de Betz, Nicole S Leffers, Jessica Tanner, Kimberly D Coley, John D |
| collection | PubMed - marine biology |
| contents | Spontaneous Anthropocentric Language Use in University Students' Explanations of Biological Concepts Varies by Topic and Predicts Misconception Agreement. Nielson, Catie Pitt, Emma Fux, Michal Nesnera, Kristin de Betz, Nicole S Leffers, Jessica Tanner, Kimberly D Coley, John D Humans Students Universities Biology Language Female Male Thinking Young Adult Comprehension Concept Formation Previous research has shown that students employ intuitive thinking when understanding scientific concepts. Three types of intuitive thinking-essentialist, teleological, and anthropic thinking-are used in biology learning and can lead to misconceptions. However, it is unknown how commonly these types of intuitive thinking, or cognitive construals, are used spontaneously in students' explanations across biological concepts and whether this usage is related to endorsement of construal-consistent misconceptions. In this study, we examined how frequently undergraduate students across two U.S. universities ( = 807) used construal-consistent language (CCL) to explain in response to open-ended questions related to five core biology concepts (e.g., evolution), how CCL use differed by concept, and how this usage was related to misconceptions agreement. We found that the majority of students used some kind of CCL in the responses to these open-ended questions and that CCL use varied by target concept. We also found that students who used CCL in their response agreed more strongly with misconception statements, a relationship driven by anthropocentric language use, or language that focused on humans. These findings suggest that American university students use intuitive thinking when reasoning about biological concepts with implications for their understanding. |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | pubmed_39808720 |
| institution | PubMed |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | CBE life sciences education |
| record_format | pubmed |
| spellingShingle | Spontaneous Anthropocentric Language Use in University Students' Explanations of Biological Concepts Varies by Topic and Predicts Misconception Agreement. Nielson, Catie Pitt, Emma Fux, Michal Nesnera, Kristin de Betz, Nicole S Leffers, Jessica Tanner, Kimberly D Coley, John D Humans Students Universities Biology Language Female Male Thinking Young Adult Comprehension Concept Formation Spontaneous Anthropocentric Language Use in University Students' Explanations of Biological Concepts Varies by Topic and Predicts Misconception Agreement. Nielson, Catie Pitt, Emma Fux, Michal Nesnera, Kristin de Betz, Nicole S Leffers, Jessica Tanner, Kimberly D Coley, John D Humans Students Universities Biology Language Female Male Thinking Young Adult Comprehension Concept Formation Previous research has shown that students employ intuitive thinking when understanding scientific concepts. Three types of intuitive thinking-essentialist, teleological, and anthropic thinking-are used in biology learning and can lead to misconceptions. However, it is unknown how commonly these types of intuitive thinking, or cognitive construals, are used spontaneously in students' explanations across biological concepts and whether this usage is related to endorsement of construal-consistent misconceptions. In this study, we examined how frequently undergraduate students across two U.S. universities ( = 807) used construal-consistent language (CCL) to explain in response to open-ended questions related to five core biology concepts (e.g., evolution), how CCL use differed by concept, and how this usage was related to misconceptions agreement. We found that the majority of students used some kind of CCL in the responses to these open-ended questions and that CCL use varied by target concept. We also found that students who used CCL in their response agreed more strongly with misconception statements, a relationship driven by anthropocentric language use, or language that focused on humans. These findings suggest that American university students use intuitive thinking when reasoning about biological concepts with implications for their understanding. |
| title | Spontaneous Anthropocentric Language Use in University Students' Explanations of Biological Concepts Varies by Topic and Predicts Misconception Agreement. |
| topic | Humans Students Universities Biology Language Female Male Thinking Young Adult Comprehension Concept Formation |
| url | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39808720/ |