Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hutchings, Brenna, López-Legentil, Susanna, Stefaniak, Lauren, Nydam, Marie, Erwin, Patrick M
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: MicrobiologyOpen 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40375452/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1868266203996225536
author Hutchings, Brenna
López-Legentil, Susanna
Stefaniak, Lauren
Nydam, Marie
Erwin, Patrick M
author_facet Hutchings, Brenna
López-Legentil, Susanna
Stefaniak, Lauren
Nydam, Marie
Erwin, Patrick M
Hutchings, Brenna
López-Legentil, Susanna
Stefaniak, Lauren
Nydam, Marie
Erwin, Patrick M
collection PubMed - marine biology
contents Microbial Distortion? Impacts of Delayed Preservation on Microbiome Diversity and Composition in a Marine Invertebrate. Hutchings, Brenna López-Legentil, Susanna Stefaniak, Lauren Nydam, Marie Erwin, Patrick M Animals Microbiota RNA, Ribosomal, 16S Seawater Bacteria Urochordata Preservation, Biological Biodiversity DNA, Bacterial Sequence Analysis, DNA Belize Time Factors DNA, Ribosomal Phylogeny Field collections of marine invertebrates are often accompanied by delays in preservation, which may impact microbiome composition. Here, we tested the effects of delayed preservation and relaxation methods on microbiome diversity and composition in the colonial ascidian Trididemnum solidum using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Replicate samples collected from Belizean reefs were either (1) immediately preserved in ethanol ("control"), (2) held in ambient seawater for 3 h before preservation ("SW"), or (3) held in ambient seawater with menthol (a common pre-preservation relaxation technique for ascidian identification) for 3 h before preservation ("SW + M"). All T. solidum microbiomes were different from ambient seawater bacterioplankton and dominated by the same microbial taxa, including the genera Thalassobaculum, Tistrella, and Synechocystis. However, the 3-h delay in sample preservation (SW) significantly reduced microbiome richness compared to controls (p = 0.028), while menthol treatment (SW + M) mitigated this diversity loss (p = 0.208). Microbial composition at the community level did not differ significantly for either delayed preservation method compared to controls (SW p = 0.054, SW + M p = 0.052). Taxon-level shifts were rare but did occur, most notably a bloom of the facultatively anaerobic gammaproteobacterium Catenococcus that was 37x (SW) and 197x (SW + M) more abundant in delayed preservations. After a 3-h preservation delay (SW), only 122 microbial taxa (1.85% of total) exhibited significantly differential abundances with controls, with menthol treatment (SW + M) reducing taxon-level shifts to 65 taxa (0.98%). Our results showed that brief delays in preservation did not significantly alter community-level microbiome composition and dominant taxa, with menthol exposure counteracting minor microbiome shifts associated with preservation delays.
format Artículo científico
id pubmed_40375452
institution PubMed
language en
publishDate 2025
publisher MicrobiologyOpen
record_format pubmed
spellingShingle Microbial Distortion? Impacts of Delayed Preservation on Microbiome Diversity and Composition in a Marine Invertebrate.
Hutchings, Brenna
López-Legentil, Susanna
Stefaniak, Lauren
Nydam, Marie
Erwin, Patrick M
Animals
Microbiota
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
Seawater
Bacteria
Urochordata
Preservation, Biological
Biodiversity
DNA, Bacterial
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Belize
Time Factors
DNA, Ribosomal
Phylogeny
Microbial Distortion? Impacts of Delayed Preservation on Microbiome Diversity and Composition in a Marine Invertebrate. Hutchings, Brenna López-Legentil, Susanna Stefaniak, Lauren Nydam, Marie Erwin, Patrick M Animals Microbiota RNA, Ribosomal, 16S Seawater Bacteria Urochordata Preservation, Biological Biodiversity DNA, Bacterial Sequence Analysis, DNA Belize Time Factors DNA, Ribosomal Phylogeny Field collections of marine invertebrates are often accompanied by delays in preservation, which may impact microbiome composition. Here, we tested the effects of delayed preservation and relaxation methods on microbiome diversity and composition in the colonial ascidian Trididemnum solidum using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Replicate samples collected from Belizean reefs were either (1) immediately preserved in ethanol ("control"), (2) held in ambient seawater for 3 h before preservation ("SW"), or (3) held in ambient seawater with menthol (a common pre-preservation relaxation technique for ascidian identification) for 3 h before preservation ("SW + M"). All T. solidum microbiomes were different from ambient seawater bacterioplankton and dominated by the same microbial taxa, including the genera Thalassobaculum, Tistrella, and Synechocystis. However, the 3-h delay in sample preservation (SW) significantly reduced microbiome richness compared to controls (p = 0.028), while menthol treatment (SW + M) mitigated this diversity loss (p = 0.208). Microbial composition at the community level did not differ significantly for either delayed preservation method compared to controls (SW p = 0.054, SW + M p = 0.052). Taxon-level shifts were rare but did occur, most notably a bloom of the facultatively anaerobic gammaproteobacterium Catenococcus that was 37x (SW) and 197x (SW + M) more abundant in delayed preservations. After a 3-h preservation delay (SW), only 122 microbial taxa (1.85% of total) exhibited significantly differential abundances with controls, with menthol treatment (SW + M) reducing taxon-level shifts to 65 taxa (0.98%). Our results showed that brief delays in preservation did not significantly alter community-level microbiome composition and dominant taxa, with menthol exposure counteracting minor microbiome shifts associated with preservation delays.
title Microbial Distortion? Impacts of Delayed Preservation on Microbiome Diversity and Composition in a Marine Invertebrate.
topic Animals
Microbiota
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
Seawater
Bacteria
Urochordata
Preservation, Biological
Biodiversity
DNA, Bacterial
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Belize
Time Factors
DNA, Ribosomal
Phylogeny
url https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40375452/