Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gusmao, Ana Carolina Bercini, van Dijk, Robin L, Girard, Elsa B, Peijnenburg, Katja T C A, Macher, Jan, Kucera, Michal, Morard, Raphaël
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: Scientific reports 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40451908/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1868266196181188608
author Gusmao, Ana Carolina Bercini
van Dijk, Robin L
Girard, Elsa B
Peijnenburg, Katja T C A
Macher, Jan
Kucera, Michal
Morard, Raphaël
author_facet Gusmao, Ana Carolina Bercini
van Dijk, Robin L
Girard, Elsa B
Peijnenburg, Katja T C A
Macher, Jan
Kucera, Michal
Morard, Raphaël
Gusmao, Ana Carolina Bercini
van Dijk, Robin L
Girard, Elsa B
Peijnenburg, Katja T C A
Macher, Jan
Kucera, Michal
Morard, Raphaël
collection PubMed - marine biology
contents Exploring the potential of the COI gene marker for DNA barcoding of planktonic foraminifera. Gusmao, Ana Carolina Bercini van Dijk, Robin L Girard, Elsa B Peijnenburg, Katja T C A Macher, Jan Kucera, Michal Morard, Raphaël Foraminifera DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic Electron Transport Complex IV Plankton Genetic Markers Phylogeny Metabarcoding is a cornerstone of modern ecology, but its accuracy is dependent on the chosen gene marker. While the small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU) is a powerful tool to describe protist diversity, its reliability in retrieving the composition of communities is less obvious. It is particularly challenging to obtain quantitative estimates of abundance in planktonic foraminifera, where the variability of the SSU gene copy number can span three orders of magnitude. As an alternative, we explored the potential of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) marker. We developed a reference barcode library of 130 sequences of a 1200 bp long COI fragment belonging to 26 morphospecies of foraminifera and performed 201 single-cell qPCR quantifications to evaluate the relationship between the number of COI copies, and the size of individual foraminifera. We found that the COI evolves between 25 and 1000 times slower than the SSU and therefore has a poor taxonomic resolution. However, we observed a significant relationship between COI copy number and foraminifera size. These results suggest that SSU and COI can play complementary roles: the SSU is well-suited for capturing taxonomic diversity, while the COI is useful to retrieve crude information on the community composition.
format Artículo científico
id pubmed_40451908
institution PubMed
language en
publishDate 2025
publisher Scientific reports
record_format pubmed
spellingShingle Exploring the potential of the COI gene marker for DNA barcoding of planktonic foraminifera.
Gusmao, Ana Carolina Bercini
van Dijk, Robin L
Girard, Elsa B
Peijnenburg, Katja T C A
Macher, Jan
Kucera, Michal
Morard, Raphaël
Foraminifera
DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic
Electron Transport Complex IV
Plankton
Genetic Markers
Phylogeny
Exploring the potential of the COI gene marker for DNA barcoding of planktonic foraminifera. Gusmao, Ana Carolina Bercini van Dijk, Robin L Girard, Elsa B Peijnenburg, Katja T C A Macher, Jan Kucera, Michal Morard, Raphaël Foraminifera DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic Electron Transport Complex IV Plankton Genetic Markers Phylogeny Metabarcoding is a cornerstone of modern ecology, but its accuracy is dependent on the chosen gene marker. While the small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU) is a powerful tool to describe protist diversity, its reliability in retrieving the composition of communities is less obvious. It is particularly challenging to obtain quantitative estimates of abundance in planktonic foraminifera, where the variability of the SSU gene copy number can span three orders of magnitude. As an alternative, we explored the potential of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) marker. We developed a reference barcode library of 130 sequences of a 1200 bp long COI fragment belonging to 26 morphospecies of foraminifera and performed 201 single-cell qPCR quantifications to evaluate the relationship between the number of COI copies, and the size of individual foraminifera. We found that the COI evolves between 25 and 1000 times slower than the SSU and therefore has a poor taxonomic resolution. However, we observed a significant relationship between COI copy number and foraminifera size. These results suggest that SSU and COI can play complementary roles: the SSU is well-suited for capturing taxonomic diversity, while the COI is useful to retrieve crude information on the community composition.
title Exploring the potential of the COI gene marker for DNA barcoding of planktonic foraminifera.
topic Foraminifera
DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic
Electron Transport Complex IV
Plankton
Genetic Markers
Phylogeny
url https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40451908/