The distribution of fitness effects varies phylogenetically across animals.

Fuente: PubMed
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lin, Meixi, Chakraborty, Sneha, Amorim, Carlos Eduardo G, Nigenda-Morales, Sergio F, Beichman, Annabel C, Nuñez-Valencia, Paulina G, Mah, Jonathan, Robinson, Jacqueline A, Kyriazis, Christopher C, Huber, Christian D, Webb, Andrew E, Kocher, Sarah D, Archer, Frederick I, Moreno-Estrada, Andrés, Wayne, Robert K, Lohmueller, Kirk E
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology 2025
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1868266196162314240
author Lin, Meixi
Chakraborty, Sneha
Amorim, Carlos Eduardo G
Nigenda-Morales, Sergio F
Beichman, Annabel C
Nuñez-Valencia, Paulina G
Mah, Jonathan
Robinson, Jacqueline A
Kyriazis, Christopher C
Huber, Christian D
Webb, Andrew E
Kocher, Sarah D
Archer, Frederick I
Moreno-Estrada, Andrés
Wayne, Robert K
Lohmueller, Kirk E
author_facet Lin, Meixi
Chakraborty, Sneha
Amorim, Carlos Eduardo G
Nigenda-Morales, Sergio F
Beichman, Annabel C
Nuñez-Valencia, Paulina G
Mah, Jonathan
Robinson, Jacqueline A
Kyriazis, Christopher C
Huber, Christian D
Webb, Andrew E
Kocher, Sarah D
Archer, Frederick I
Moreno-Estrada, Andrés
Wayne, Robert K
Lohmueller, Kirk E
Lin, Meixi
Chakraborty, Sneha
Amorim, Carlos Eduardo G
Nigenda-Morales, Sergio F
Beichman, Annabel C
Nuñez-Valencia, Paulina G
Mah, Jonathan
Robinson, Jacqueline A
Kyriazis, Christopher C
Huber, Christian D
Webb, Andrew E
Kocher, Sarah D
Archer, Frederick I
Moreno-Estrada, Andrés
Wayne, Robert K
Lohmueller, Kirk E
collection PubMed - marine biology
contents The distribution of fitness effects varies phylogenetically across animals. Lin, Meixi Chakraborty, Sneha Amorim, Carlos Eduardo G Nigenda-Morales, Sergio F Beichman, Annabel C Nuñez-Valencia, Paulina G Mah, Jonathan Robinson, Jacqueline A Kyriazis, Christopher C Huber, Christian D Webb, Andrew E Kocher, Sarah D Archer, Frederick I Moreno-Estrada, Andrés Wayne, Robert K Lohmueller, Kirk E The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) describes the selection coefficients ( ) of newly arising mutations and fundamentally influences population genetic processes. However, the extent and mechanisms of DFE variation have not been systematically investigated across species with divergent phylogenetic histories and ecological functions. Here, we inferred the DFE in natural populations of eleven animal (sub)species, including humans, mice, fin whales, vaquitas, wolves, collared flycatchers, pied flycatchers, halictid bees, , and mosquitoes. We find that the DFE co-varies with phylogeny, where the expected mutation effects are more similar in closely related species ( ). Additionally, mammals have a higher proportion of strongly deleterious mutations (22% to 47% in mammals; 0.0% to 5.4% in insects and birds) and a lower proportion of weakly deleterious mutations than insects and birds. Population size is significantly negatively correlated with the expected impact of new deleterious mutations ( ), and the proportion of new beneficial mutations ( ). These findings align with Fisher's Geometric Model (FGM), which defines organismal complexity as the number of phenotypes under selection. Consistent with the FGM's predictions, we observe that mutations are more deleterious in complex organisms, while beneficial mutations occur more frequently in smaller populations to compensate for the drift load. Our study demonstrates strong phylogenetic constraints in the evolution of a fundamental population genetics parameter, and proposes that, through mechanisms of global epistasis, long-term population size and organismal complexity drive variation in the DFE across animals.
format Artículo científico
id pubmed_40463062
institution PubMed
language en
publishDate 2025
publisher bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology
record_format pubmed
spellingShingle The distribution of fitness effects varies phylogenetically across animals.
Lin, Meixi
Chakraborty, Sneha
Amorim, Carlos Eduardo G
Nigenda-Morales, Sergio F
Beichman, Annabel C
Nuñez-Valencia, Paulina G
Mah, Jonathan
Robinson, Jacqueline A
Kyriazis, Christopher C
Huber, Christian D
Webb, Andrew E
Kocher, Sarah D
Archer, Frederick I
Moreno-Estrada, Andrés
Wayne, Robert K
Lohmueller, Kirk E
The distribution of fitness effects varies phylogenetically across animals. Lin, Meixi Chakraborty, Sneha Amorim, Carlos Eduardo G Nigenda-Morales, Sergio F Beichman, Annabel C Nuñez-Valencia, Paulina G Mah, Jonathan Robinson, Jacqueline A Kyriazis, Christopher C Huber, Christian D Webb, Andrew E Kocher, Sarah D Archer, Frederick I Moreno-Estrada, Andrés Wayne, Robert K Lohmueller, Kirk E The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) describes the selection coefficients ( ) of newly arising mutations and fundamentally influences population genetic processes. However, the extent and mechanisms of DFE variation have not been systematically investigated across species with divergent phylogenetic histories and ecological functions. Here, we inferred the DFE in natural populations of eleven animal (sub)species, including humans, mice, fin whales, vaquitas, wolves, collared flycatchers, pied flycatchers, halictid bees, , and mosquitoes. We find that the DFE co-varies with phylogeny, where the expected mutation effects are more similar in closely related species ( ). Additionally, mammals have a higher proportion of strongly deleterious mutations (22% to 47% in mammals; 0.0% to 5.4% in insects and birds) and a lower proportion of weakly deleterious mutations than insects and birds. Population size is significantly negatively correlated with the expected impact of new deleterious mutations ( ), and the proportion of new beneficial mutations ( ). These findings align with Fisher's Geometric Model (FGM), which defines organismal complexity as the number of phenotypes under selection. Consistent with the FGM's predictions, we observe that mutations are more deleterious in complex organisms, while beneficial mutations occur more frequently in smaller populations to compensate for the drift load. Our study demonstrates strong phylogenetic constraints in the evolution of a fundamental population genetics parameter, and proposes that, through mechanisms of global epistasis, long-term population size and organismal complexity drive variation in the DFE across animals.
title The distribution of fitness effects varies phylogenetically across animals.
url https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40463062/