Development of ecocentric radiation protection: issues, challenges and approaches.
Fuente:
PubMed
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
International journal of radiation biology
2025
|
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1868266111383896064 |
|---|---|
| author | Mothersill, Carmel Desai, Rhea Alonzo, Frédéric Ariyoshi, Kentaro Bonisoli-Alquati, Andrea Bradshaw, Clare Bréchignac, François Byun, Soo Hyun Chauhan, Vinita Cresswell, Tom Haanes, Hallvard Horemans, Nele Howe, Orla Jha, Awadhesh N Kapustka, Lawrence A MacIntosh, Amy E Oughton, Deborah H Puzas, Andrius Schofield, Paul N Seymour, Colin Tollefsen, Knut Erik Vives I Batlle, Jordi Wood, Michael D |
| author_facet | Mothersill, Carmel Desai, Rhea Alonzo, Frédéric Ariyoshi, Kentaro Bonisoli-Alquati, Andrea Bradshaw, Clare Bréchignac, François Byun, Soo Hyun Chauhan, Vinita Cresswell, Tom Haanes, Hallvard Horemans, Nele Howe, Orla Jha, Awadhesh N Kapustka, Lawrence A MacIntosh, Amy E Oughton, Deborah H Puzas, Andrius Schofield, Paul N Seymour, Colin Tollefsen, Knut Erik Vives I Batlle, Jordi Wood, Michael D Mothersill, Carmel Desai, Rhea Alonzo, Frédéric Ariyoshi, Kentaro Bonisoli-Alquati, Andrea Bradshaw, Clare Bréchignac, François Byun, Soo Hyun Chauhan, Vinita Cresswell, Tom Haanes, Hallvard Horemans, Nele Howe, Orla Jha, Awadhesh N Kapustka, Lawrence A MacIntosh, Amy E Oughton, Deborah H Puzas, Andrius Schofield, Paul N Seymour, Colin Tollefsen, Knut Erik Vives I Batlle, Jordi Wood, Michael D |
| collection | PubMed - marine biology |
| contents | Development of ecocentric radiation protection: issues, challenges and approaches. Mothersill, Carmel Desai, Rhea Alonzo, Frédéric Ariyoshi, Kentaro Bonisoli-Alquati, Andrea Bradshaw, Clare Bréchignac, François Byun, Soo Hyun Chauhan, Vinita Cresswell, Tom Haanes, Hallvard Horemans, Nele Howe, Orla Jha, Awadhesh N Kapustka, Lawrence A MacIntosh, Amy E Oughton, Deborah H Puzas, Andrius Schofield, Paul N Seymour, Colin Tollefsen, Knut Erik Vives I Batlle, Jordi Wood, Michael D This position paper results from an International Union of Radioecology symposium aimed at identifying challenges to develop eco-centric and holistic approaches to understanding ionizing radiation impacts on ecosystems. An ecosystem approach is particularly relevant today not only because of the triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution, which make single-stressor approaches unrealistic, but because of renewed interest in nuclear power as a potential solution to transition away from fossil fuels. For example, there are proposals to site small modular reactors in remote and pristine areas. The focus of the symposium was to expand the boundaries of existing approaches in radioecology and look at issues like ecosystem complexity and multiple stressors, which complicate single-stressor approaches. Discussion centered around existing tools for radiation protection e.g. Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) analysis, biomarkers, use of microcosms and mesocosms and modeling approaches. These approaches were discussed with emphasis on identifying gaps, boundaries, and where leaps into the unknown might be beneficial. Identified challenges with biomarker and AOP approaches were that the individual level is generally addressed while interrelatedness of ecosystem components is difficult to capture. Novel ideas suggested were to construct multiple-stressor AOPs which capture key interactions and consider time as a critical component, or to exploit 'ecological network analysis' metrics which have been extensively used in ecological science. Other discussions centered on complexity and chaos modeling. The use of microcosms, focused field studies, and harnessing ecosystem information and communication systems were suggested to bridge the gap between individual and population-level responses. |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | pubmed_41396805 |
| institution | PubMed |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher | International journal of radiation biology |
| record_format | pubmed |
| spellingShingle | Development of ecocentric radiation protection: issues, challenges and approaches. Mothersill, Carmel Desai, Rhea Alonzo, Frédéric Ariyoshi, Kentaro Bonisoli-Alquati, Andrea Bradshaw, Clare Bréchignac, François Byun, Soo Hyun Chauhan, Vinita Cresswell, Tom Haanes, Hallvard Horemans, Nele Howe, Orla Jha, Awadhesh N Kapustka, Lawrence A MacIntosh, Amy E Oughton, Deborah H Puzas, Andrius Schofield, Paul N Seymour, Colin Tollefsen, Knut Erik Vives I Batlle, Jordi Wood, Michael D Development of ecocentric radiation protection: issues, challenges and approaches. Mothersill, Carmel Desai, Rhea Alonzo, Frédéric Ariyoshi, Kentaro Bonisoli-Alquati, Andrea Bradshaw, Clare Bréchignac, François Byun, Soo Hyun Chauhan, Vinita Cresswell, Tom Haanes, Hallvard Horemans, Nele Howe, Orla Jha, Awadhesh N Kapustka, Lawrence A MacIntosh, Amy E Oughton, Deborah H Puzas, Andrius Schofield, Paul N Seymour, Colin Tollefsen, Knut Erik Vives I Batlle, Jordi Wood, Michael D This position paper results from an International Union of Radioecology symposium aimed at identifying challenges to develop eco-centric and holistic approaches to understanding ionizing radiation impacts on ecosystems. An ecosystem approach is particularly relevant today not only because of the triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution, which make single-stressor approaches unrealistic, but because of renewed interest in nuclear power as a potential solution to transition away from fossil fuels. For example, there are proposals to site small modular reactors in remote and pristine areas. The focus of the symposium was to expand the boundaries of existing approaches in radioecology and look at issues like ecosystem complexity and multiple stressors, which complicate single-stressor approaches. Discussion centered around existing tools for radiation protection e.g. Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) analysis, biomarkers, use of microcosms and mesocosms and modeling approaches. These approaches were discussed with emphasis on identifying gaps, boundaries, and where leaps into the unknown might be beneficial. Identified challenges with biomarker and AOP approaches were that the individual level is generally addressed while interrelatedness of ecosystem components is difficult to capture. Novel ideas suggested were to construct multiple-stressor AOPs which capture key interactions and consider time as a critical component, or to exploit 'ecological network analysis' metrics which have been extensively used in ecological science. Other discussions centered on complexity and chaos modeling. The use of microcosms, focused field studies, and harnessing ecosystem information and communication systems were suggested to bridge the gap between individual and population-level responses. |
| title | Development of ecocentric radiation protection: issues, challenges and approaches. |
| url | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41396805/ |