Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: McCleery, Robert A, Ferreria, Sam M, Mhlava, Philip, Mathebula, Obert, Tanneback, Tiger, Coetsee, Corli, Dalu, Tatenda, Dutton, Christopher, Khosa, Dumisani, Munyai, Linton F, Parker, Daniel M, Subalusky, Amanda L, Twala, Buhlebenkosi, Voysey, Michael D, Wigley, Benjamin J
Format: Artículo científico
Langue:en
Publié: Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41674508/
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1868266087557103616
author McCleery, Robert A
Ferreria, Sam M
Mhlava, Philip
Mathebula, Obert
Tanneback, Tiger
Coetsee, Corli
Dalu, Tatenda
Dutton, Christopher
Khosa, Dumisani
Munyai, Linton F
Parker, Daniel M
Subalusky, Amanda L
Twala, Buhlebenkosi
Voysey, Michael D
Wigley, Benjamin J
author_facet McCleery, Robert A
Ferreria, Sam M
Mhlava, Philip
Mathebula, Obert
Tanneback, Tiger
Coetsee, Corli
Dalu, Tatenda
Dutton, Christopher
Khosa, Dumisani
Munyai, Linton F
Parker, Daniel M
Subalusky, Amanda L
Twala, Buhlebenkosi
Voysey, Michael D
Wigley, Benjamin J
McCleery, Robert A
Ferreria, Sam M
Mhlava, Philip
Mathebula, Obert
Tanneback, Tiger
Coetsee, Corli
Dalu, Tatenda
Dutton, Christopher
Khosa, Dumisani
Munyai, Linton F
Parker, Daniel M
Subalusky, Amanda L
Twala, Buhlebenkosi
Voysey, Michael D
Wigley, Benjamin J
collection PubMed - marine biology
contents Artificial surface water broadens the spatiotemporal footprint of herbivores and alters species responses. McCleery, Robert A Ferreria, Sam M Mhlava, Philip Mathebula, Obert Tanneback, Tiger Coetsee, Corli Dalu, Tatenda Dutton, Christopher Khosa, Dumisani Munyai, Linton F Parker, Daniel M Subalusky, Amanda L Twala, Buhlebenkosi Voysey, Michael D Wigley, Benjamin J Animals Herbivory Seasons Biomass Conservation of Natural Resources Artificial surface water (ASW), created through dams, impoundments, and other engineered water features, is increasingly deployed in arid protected areas to support wildlife. However, our understanding of how and why ASW shapes the spatiotemporal activity and ecologically relevant biomass of large mammalian herbivores remains limited. We evaluated whether one form of ASW, dammed seasonal drainages that create reservoirs, alters the metabolic biomass, spatial distribution, and seasonal activity patterns of large herbivores. Specifically, we tested whether reservoirs shifted large herbivore use from seasonal pulses to persistent disturbance, modify species activity patterns, and if large herbivore distributions correspond with their theoretical water dependence. Using a paired catchment design, we deployed camera traps around 11 reservoirs and 11 undammed drainages in Kruger National Park. Cameras were placed along 2250-m transects. Species-specific activity and metabolic biomass were modeled as a function of catchment type, season, and distance from the edge of reservoirs or undammed drainage. Reservoirs concentrated large herbivore activity year-round, indicating a shift from seasonal to persistent disturbance regimes. Dammed catchments supported higher large herbivore metabolic biomass in both wet and dry seasons, with effects extending to just over 1 km in the dry season and >2 km during the wet season. Elephants comprised more than 50% of the observed biomass, and other species such as hippopotamus, impala, and zebra also concentrated their activity near reservoirs. In contrast, browsing species like giraffe, duiker, and steenbok were more active in catchments with undammed drainages. Contrary to expectation, species' water dependence scores did not consistently predict species responses. While ASW can enhance wildlife visibility and forage access, it also risks excluding some species and concentrating herbivore impacts, with implications for vegetation change, human-wildlife conflict along park boundaries, and ecosystem resilience. We recommend adaptive ASW management strategies, including the strategic placement and temporal manipulation of surface water, to balance wildlife needs with long-term conservation goals-particularly under increasing climatic variability.
format Artículo científico
id pubmed_41674508
institution PubMed
language en
publishDate 2026
publisher Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America
record_format pubmed
spellingShingle Artificial surface water broadens the spatiotemporal footprint of herbivores and alters species responses.
McCleery, Robert A
Ferreria, Sam M
Mhlava, Philip
Mathebula, Obert
Tanneback, Tiger
Coetsee, Corli
Dalu, Tatenda
Dutton, Christopher
Khosa, Dumisani
Munyai, Linton F
Parker, Daniel M
Subalusky, Amanda L
Twala, Buhlebenkosi
Voysey, Michael D
Wigley, Benjamin J
Animals
Herbivory
Seasons
Biomass
Conservation of Natural Resources
Artificial surface water broadens the spatiotemporal footprint of herbivores and alters species responses. McCleery, Robert A Ferreria, Sam M Mhlava, Philip Mathebula, Obert Tanneback, Tiger Coetsee, Corli Dalu, Tatenda Dutton, Christopher Khosa, Dumisani Munyai, Linton F Parker, Daniel M Subalusky, Amanda L Twala, Buhlebenkosi Voysey, Michael D Wigley, Benjamin J Animals Herbivory Seasons Biomass Conservation of Natural Resources Artificial surface water (ASW), created through dams, impoundments, and other engineered water features, is increasingly deployed in arid protected areas to support wildlife. However, our understanding of how and why ASW shapes the spatiotemporal activity and ecologically relevant biomass of large mammalian herbivores remains limited. We evaluated whether one form of ASW, dammed seasonal drainages that create reservoirs, alters the metabolic biomass, spatial distribution, and seasonal activity patterns of large herbivores. Specifically, we tested whether reservoirs shifted large herbivore use from seasonal pulses to persistent disturbance, modify species activity patterns, and if large herbivore distributions correspond with their theoretical water dependence. Using a paired catchment design, we deployed camera traps around 11 reservoirs and 11 undammed drainages in Kruger National Park. Cameras were placed along 2250-m transects. Species-specific activity and metabolic biomass were modeled as a function of catchment type, season, and distance from the edge of reservoirs or undammed drainage. Reservoirs concentrated large herbivore activity year-round, indicating a shift from seasonal to persistent disturbance regimes. Dammed catchments supported higher large herbivore metabolic biomass in both wet and dry seasons, with effects extending to just over 1 km in the dry season and >2 km during the wet season. Elephants comprised more than 50% of the observed biomass, and other species such as hippopotamus, impala, and zebra also concentrated their activity near reservoirs. In contrast, browsing species like giraffe, duiker, and steenbok were more active in catchments with undammed drainages. Contrary to expectation, species' water dependence scores did not consistently predict species responses. While ASW can enhance wildlife visibility and forage access, it also risks excluding some species and concentrating herbivore impacts, with implications for vegetation change, human-wildlife conflict along park boundaries, and ecosystem resilience. We recommend adaptive ASW management strategies, including the strategic placement and temporal manipulation of surface water, to balance wildlife needs with long-term conservation goals-particularly under increasing climatic variability.
title Artificial surface water broadens the spatiotemporal footprint of herbivores and alters species responses.
topic Animals
Herbivory
Seasons
Biomass
Conservation of Natural Resources
url https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41674508/