Polylactic acid versus polypropylene microplastics: ecotoxicological effects on Gammarus aequicauda using a multi-level approach.

Fuente: PubMed
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Biandolino, Francesca, Amato, Amalia, Costantini, Maria, Albarano, Luisa, Manfra, Loredana, Libralato, Giovanni, Zupo, Valerio, Prato, Ermelinda
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: Marine pollution bulletin 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1868266084861214720
author Biandolino, Francesca
Amato, Amalia
Costantini, Maria
Albarano, Luisa
Manfra, Loredana
Libralato, Giovanni
Zupo, Valerio
Prato, Ermelinda
author_facet Biandolino, Francesca
Amato, Amalia
Costantini, Maria
Albarano, Luisa
Manfra, Loredana
Libralato, Giovanni
Zupo, Valerio
Prato, Ermelinda
Biandolino, Francesca
Amato, Amalia
Costantini, Maria
Albarano, Luisa
Manfra, Loredana
Libralato, Giovanni
Zupo, Valerio
Prato, Ermelinda
collection PubMed - marine biology
contents Polylactic acid versus polypropylene microplastics: ecotoxicological effects on Gammarus aequicauda using a multi-level approach. Biandolino, Francesca Amato, Amalia Costantini, Maria Albarano, Luisa Manfra, Loredana Libralato, Giovanni Zupo, Valerio Prato, Ermelinda Animals Microplastics Polyesters Water Pollutants, Chemical Amphipoda Polypropylenes Reproduction Ecotoxicology This study compared the effects of microplastics (MPs) originating from a fossil-based polymer (polypropylene, PP) and a bioplastic (polylactic acid, PLA) on the amphipod Gammarus aequicauda. Microplastics (38-220 μm) derived from commercial disposable products were used to evaluate acute toxicity, yielding 96-h LC₅₀ values of >100 mg/L for PLA and 34.71 mg/L for PP. Both MP types were further tested under sub-lethal conditions (5 mg/L) over a 60-day exposure period to assess impacts on growth and reproduction. Chronic exposure resulted in a significant reduction in growth in both PLA- and PP-treated groups beginning at day 45, with PP-exposed individuals also showing the lowest survival rates. Additionally, PLA and PP exposure prolonged embryonic development compared with controls. Reproductive impairment was most pronounced in the PP treatment, which exhibited significant decreases in the number of ovigerous females and in total offspring, alongside an increase in aborted eggs. Seven stress-related genes were identified for the first time in G. aequicauda, and their expression was quantified by RT-qPCR following 15, 30, and 45 days of exposure. Gene expression profiles showed complex, time-dependent responses, with both MP types inducing largely similar transcriptional patterns by day 45, characterized by up-regulation of most target genes. Overall, the results demonstrate that commercially derived PP and PLA microplastics can elicit physiological and reproductive stress in G. aequicauda, underscoring their potential ecological risk.
format Artículo científico
id pubmed_41707286
institution PubMed
language en
publishDate 2026
publisher Marine pollution bulletin
record_format pubmed
spellingShingle Polylactic acid versus polypropylene microplastics: ecotoxicological effects on Gammarus aequicauda using a multi-level approach.
Biandolino, Francesca
Amato, Amalia
Costantini, Maria
Albarano, Luisa
Manfra, Loredana
Libralato, Giovanni
Zupo, Valerio
Prato, Ermelinda
Animals
Microplastics
Polyesters
Water Pollutants, Chemical
Amphipoda
Polypropylenes
Reproduction
Ecotoxicology
Polylactic acid versus polypropylene microplastics: ecotoxicological effects on Gammarus aequicauda using a multi-level approach. Biandolino, Francesca Amato, Amalia Costantini, Maria Albarano, Luisa Manfra, Loredana Libralato, Giovanni Zupo, Valerio Prato, Ermelinda Animals Microplastics Polyesters Water Pollutants, Chemical Amphipoda Polypropylenes Reproduction Ecotoxicology This study compared the effects of microplastics (MPs) originating from a fossil-based polymer (polypropylene, PP) and a bioplastic (polylactic acid, PLA) on the amphipod Gammarus aequicauda. Microplastics (38-220 μm) derived from commercial disposable products were used to evaluate acute toxicity, yielding 96-h LC₅₀ values of >100 mg/L for PLA and 34.71 mg/L for PP. Both MP types were further tested under sub-lethal conditions (5 mg/L) over a 60-day exposure period to assess impacts on growth and reproduction. Chronic exposure resulted in a significant reduction in growth in both PLA- and PP-treated groups beginning at day 45, with PP-exposed individuals also showing the lowest survival rates. Additionally, PLA and PP exposure prolonged embryonic development compared with controls. Reproductive impairment was most pronounced in the PP treatment, which exhibited significant decreases in the number of ovigerous females and in total offspring, alongside an increase in aborted eggs. Seven stress-related genes were identified for the first time in G. aequicauda, and their expression was quantified by RT-qPCR following 15, 30, and 45 days of exposure. Gene expression profiles showed complex, time-dependent responses, with both MP types inducing largely similar transcriptional patterns by day 45, characterized by up-regulation of most target genes. Overall, the results demonstrate that commercially derived PP and PLA microplastics can elicit physiological and reproductive stress in G. aequicauda, underscoring their potential ecological risk.
title Polylactic acid versus polypropylene microplastics: ecotoxicological effects on Gammarus aequicauda using a multi-level approach.
topic Animals
Microplastics
Polyesters
Water Pollutants, Chemical
Amphipoda
Polypropylenes
Reproduction
Ecotoxicology
url https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41707286/