Vocal compensation to noise in long-finned pilot whales (Globicephala melas).

Fuente: PubMed
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hegeman, Milou, Macfarlane, Nicholas B W, Verborgh, Philippe, Gauffier, Pauline, Esteban, Ruth, de Stephanis, Renaud, Tyack, Peter L, Jensen, Frants H
Formato: Artículo científico
Lenguaje:en
Publicado: The Journal of experimental biology 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1868266051114893313
author Hegeman, Milou
Macfarlane, Nicholas B W
Verborgh, Philippe
Gauffier, Pauline
Esteban, Ruth
de Stephanis, Renaud
Tyack, Peter L
Jensen, Frants H
author_facet Hegeman, Milou
Macfarlane, Nicholas B W
Verborgh, Philippe
Gauffier, Pauline
Esteban, Ruth
de Stephanis, Renaud
Tyack, Peter L
Jensen, Frants H
Hegeman, Milou
Macfarlane, Nicholas B W
Verborgh, Philippe
Gauffier, Pauline
Esteban, Ruth
de Stephanis, Renaud
Tyack, Peter L
Jensen, Frants H
collection PubMed - marine biology
contents Vocal compensation to noise in long-finned pilot whales (Globicephala melas). Hegeman, Milou Macfarlane, Nicholas B W Verborgh, Philippe Gauffier, Pauline Esteban, Ruth de Stephanis, Renaud Tyack, Peter L Jensen, Frants H Animals Whales, Pilot Noise Vocalization, Animal Female Male Diving Anthropogenic noise is considered a marine pollutant by the European Union and can impact marine animals in various ways. Noise that overlaps in time and frequency with animal communication signals can interfere with communication and thus impact ecological functions mediated by acoustic signals, depending on how animals compensate for increasing noise. Our study investigated Lombard responses in long-finned pilot whales using sound and movement recording tags in an area with high anthropogenic pressure, the Strait of Gibraltar. We tested if pilot whales increase their vocal amplitude in response to noise, and whether vocal compensation is signal or context specific. We analyzed 1336 calls from 18 individuals in small social groups of simultaneously tagged animals, allowing us to parse which individual emitted which call and how call output level depended on masking noise level. We found that pilot whales increase their call output level with 0.50±0.04 dB per 1 dB increase in noise level to partially compensate for the effects of masking noise. Call type significantly influenced the Lombard response magnitude, with vocal compensation ranging from 0.11 to 0.87 dB per 1 dB increase in noise level, whereas animals exhibited similar Lombard responses for different dive contexts (non-foraging, deep dive descent and ascent). Our results indicate that pilot whales only compensate partially for increased noise levels, and that Lombard response magnitude depends on signal type. This emphasizes the need for understanding the ecological consequences of communication disruptions to ensure sustainable management of human activities.
format Artículo científico
id pubmed_42096842
institution PubMed
language en
publishDate 2026
publisher The Journal of experimental biology
record_format pubmed
spellingShingle Vocal compensation to noise in long-finned pilot whales (Globicephala melas).
Hegeman, Milou
Macfarlane, Nicholas B W
Verborgh, Philippe
Gauffier, Pauline
Esteban, Ruth
de Stephanis, Renaud
Tyack, Peter L
Jensen, Frants H
Animals
Whales, Pilot
Noise
Vocalization, Animal
Female
Male
Diving
Vocal compensation to noise in long-finned pilot whales (Globicephala melas). Hegeman, Milou Macfarlane, Nicholas B W Verborgh, Philippe Gauffier, Pauline Esteban, Ruth de Stephanis, Renaud Tyack, Peter L Jensen, Frants H Animals Whales, Pilot Noise Vocalization, Animal Female Male Diving Anthropogenic noise is considered a marine pollutant by the European Union and can impact marine animals in various ways. Noise that overlaps in time and frequency with animal communication signals can interfere with communication and thus impact ecological functions mediated by acoustic signals, depending on how animals compensate for increasing noise. Our study investigated Lombard responses in long-finned pilot whales using sound and movement recording tags in an area with high anthropogenic pressure, the Strait of Gibraltar. We tested if pilot whales increase their vocal amplitude in response to noise, and whether vocal compensation is signal or context specific. We analyzed 1336 calls from 18 individuals in small social groups of simultaneously tagged animals, allowing us to parse which individual emitted which call and how call output level depended on masking noise level. We found that pilot whales increase their call output level with 0.50±0.04 dB per 1 dB increase in noise level to partially compensate for the effects of masking noise. Call type significantly influenced the Lombard response magnitude, with vocal compensation ranging from 0.11 to 0.87 dB per 1 dB increase in noise level, whereas animals exhibited similar Lombard responses for different dive contexts (non-foraging, deep dive descent and ascent). Our results indicate that pilot whales only compensate partially for increased noise levels, and that Lombard response magnitude depends on signal type. This emphasizes the need for understanding the ecological consequences of communication disruptions to ensure sustainable management of human activities.
title Vocal compensation to noise in long-finned pilot whales (Globicephala melas).
topic Animals
Whales, Pilot
Noise
Vocalization, Animal
Female
Male
Diving
url https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42096842/