Enzymatic plastic depolymerization: From lab promise to circular reality.
Fuente:
PubMed
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Langue: | en |
| Publié: |
Biotechnology advances
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1868266048949583872 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohamad, Osama Abdalla Abdelshafy Elsamahy, Tamer Liu, Yong-Hong Li, Xurui Li, Shuai Rajivgandhi, Govindan Zhang, Yuanming Li, Wen-Jun |
| author_facet | Mohamad, Osama Abdalla Abdelshafy Elsamahy, Tamer Liu, Yong-Hong Li, Xurui Li, Shuai Rajivgandhi, Govindan Zhang, Yuanming Li, Wen-Jun Mohamad, Osama Abdalla Abdelshafy Elsamahy, Tamer Liu, Yong-Hong Li, Xurui Li, Shuai Rajivgandhi, Govindan Zhang, Yuanming Li, Wen-Jun |
| collection | PubMed - marine biology |
| contents | Enzymatic plastic depolymerization: From lab promise to circular reality. Mohamad, Osama Abdalla Abdelshafy Elsamahy, Tamer Liu, Yong-Hong Li, Xurui Li, Shuai Rajivgandhi, Govindan Zhang, Yuanming Li, Wen-Jun Plastics Polymerization Enzymes Polymers Biotechnology Recycling Global plastic production continues to rise, yet most recycling strategies fail to deliver true circularity. Enzymatic plastic depolymerization has been widely promoted as a scalable solution. However, its real-world potential remains poorly defined. This review critically examines why many enzymatic approaches succeed in the laboratory yet break down when applied to heterogeneous post-consumer plastic waste. Evidence across polymers and processes shows that enzymatic depolymerization is fundamentally constrained by polymer chemistry rather than enzyme availability. Plastics with hydrolyzable backbones allow true depolymerization and closed-loop monomer recovery. In contrast, dominant polyolefins largely resist enzymatic attack, with reported effects limited to surface oxidation rather than verified chain scission. Many claimed advances rely on indirect measurements, pristine substrates, or abiotic pretreatments, overstating relevance to real waste streams. While enzyme engineering and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML)-guided design have significantly enhanced performance on hydrolyzable plastics, these gains frequently entail trade-offs in stability, specificity, and cost, and fail to address key limitations from solid-polymer interfaces and additives. Techno-economic studies indicate that optimized enzymatic recycling of hydrolyzable plastics could reach costs of $1.1-1.8/kg under favorable conditions. However, polyolefins require integrated pretreatment and hybrid chemo-enzymatic strategies for meaningful valorization. The review concludes with a constraint-aware 2030-2040 roadmap, positioning enzymatic recycling as a realistic but inherently limited contributor to a circular plastics economy. |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | pubmed_42114628 |
| institution | PubMed |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | Biotechnology advances |
| record_format | pubmed |
| spellingShingle | Enzymatic plastic depolymerization: From lab promise to circular reality. Mohamad, Osama Abdalla Abdelshafy Elsamahy, Tamer Liu, Yong-Hong Li, Xurui Li, Shuai Rajivgandhi, Govindan Zhang, Yuanming Li, Wen-Jun Plastics Polymerization Enzymes Polymers Biotechnology Recycling Enzymatic plastic depolymerization: From lab promise to circular reality. Mohamad, Osama Abdalla Abdelshafy Elsamahy, Tamer Liu, Yong-Hong Li, Xurui Li, Shuai Rajivgandhi, Govindan Zhang, Yuanming Li, Wen-Jun Plastics Polymerization Enzymes Polymers Biotechnology Recycling Global plastic production continues to rise, yet most recycling strategies fail to deliver true circularity. Enzymatic plastic depolymerization has been widely promoted as a scalable solution. However, its real-world potential remains poorly defined. This review critically examines why many enzymatic approaches succeed in the laboratory yet break down when applied to heterogeneous post-consumer plastic waste. Evidence across polymers and processes shows that enzymatic depolymerization is fundamentally constrained by polymer chemistry rather than enzyme availability. Plastics with hydrolyzable backbones allow true depolymerization and closed-loop monomer recovery. In contrast, dominant polyolefins largely resist enzymatic attack, with reported effects limited to surface oxidation rather than verified chain scission. Many claimed advances rely on indirect measurements, pristine substrates, or abiotic pretreatments, overstating relevance to real waste streams. While enzyme engineering and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML)-guided design have significantly enhanced performance on hydrolyzable plastics, these gains frequently entail trade-offs in stability, specificity, and cost, and fail to address key limitations from solid-polymer interfaces and additives. Techno-economic studies indicate that optimized enzymatic recycling of hydrolyzable plastics could reach costs of $1.1-1.8/kg under favorable conditions. However, polyolefins require integrated pretreatment and hybrid chemo-enzymatic strategies for meaningful valorization. The review concludes with a constraint-aware 2030-2040 roadmap, positioning enzymatic recycling as a realistic but inherently limited contributor to a circular plastics economy. |
| title | Enzymatic plastic depolymerization: From lab promise to circular reality. |
| topic | Plastics Polymerization Enzymes Polymers Biotechnology Recycling |
| url | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42114628/ |