Ontología y Lenguaje de la Realidad Social
Fuente:
Redalyc
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Sprache: | es |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Universidad de Chile
2014
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1876483019080990720 |
|---|---|
| author | Jorge Posada-Ramírez |
| author_facet | Jorge Posada-Ramírez |
| contents | Ontología y Lenguaje de la Realidad Social Jorge Posada-Ramírez Filosofía language John Searle Social sciences natural sciences subjective ontology This paper shows, from the ontology and the philosophy of language, a series of characteristics of social sciences that proves the conceptual impossibility to join them with natural sciences as a unique science. Philosophical characteristics of social sciences’ subjects (ontology of social reality), such as some features of the language that defines the social reality, illustrate that the structure of conceptual scheme of social sciences is, largely, incommensurable with the structure of natural sciences. So the text tries to explain, especially from the philosophical theses of John Searle, that the ontology of social sciences and the linguistic schemes in which is described and through which becomes the social reality, exhibit features that make about it unapproachable by natural sciences. The final objective around the over-documented methodological distinction between social and natural sciences, is to show reasons from ontology and philosophy of language for arguing the conceptual impossibility, but not methodological, for comparing both kinds of knowledge. 2014 artículo científico 0717-554X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10131702003 es http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=101 Cinta de Moebio application/pdf Universidad de Chile Cinta de Moebio (Chile) Num.50 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_10131702003 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | es |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | Universidad de Chile |
| spellingShingle | Ontología y Lenguaje de la Realidad Social Jorge Posada-Ramírez Filosofía language John Searle Social sciences natural sciences subjective ontology Ontología y Lenguaje de la Realidad Social Jorge Posada-Ramírez Filosofía language John Searle Social sciences natural sciences subjective ontology This paper shows, from the ontology and the philosophy of language, a series of characteristics of social sciences that proves the conceptual impossibility to join them with natural sciences as a unique science. Philosophical characteristics of social sciences’ subjects (ontology of social reality), such as some features of the language that defines the social reality, illustrate that the structure of conceptual scheme of social sciences is, largely, incommensurable with the structure of natural sciences. So the text tries to explain, especially from the philosophical theses of John Searle, that the ontology of social sciences and the linguistic schemes in which is described and through which becomes the social reality, exhibit features that make about it unapproachable by natural sciences. The final objective around the over-documented methodological distinction between social and natural sciences, is to show reasons from ontology and philosophy of language for arguing the conceptual impossibility, but not methodological, for comparing both kinds of knowledge. 2014 artículo científico 0717-554X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10131702003 es http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=101 Cinta de Moebio application/pdf Universidad de Chile Cinta de Moebio (Chile) Num.50 |
| title | Ontología y Lenguaje de la Realidad Social |
| topic | Filosofía language John Searle Social sciences natural sciences subjective ontology |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10131702003 |