Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Language: | es |
| Published: |
Universidad de Chile
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10131702005 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866813766574800896 |
|---|---|
| author | Miguel López-Astorga |
| author_facet | Miguel López-Astorga |
| contents | La problemática acerca de la conclusión del silogismo de la primera figura Miguel López-Astorga Filosofía syllogism First figure formal logic mental models inferential activity Espino and Santamaria experimentally demonstrate that, if the syllogisms in the first figure are not presented as is the usual practice, that is, separating their two premises into two different lines, but linking the two premises into one line by means of a full stop, individuals tend to draw from such premises conclusions in which the subject and the predicate are not in the customary order, but rotated. In their view, this finding is consistent with the assumptions of the mental models theory. Nevertheless, in this paper, I will show that what this fact really depends on the approach that is adopted, since a framework based on formal logic also has resources to explain it, and hence can lead us to assume theses different from those proposed by Espino and Santamaria. 2014 artículo científico 0717-554X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10131702005 es http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=101 Cinta de Moebio application/pdf Universidad de Chile Cinta de Moebio (Chile) Num.50 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_10131702005 |
| language | es |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | Universidad de Chile |
| spellingShingle | La problemática acerca de la conclusión del silogismo de la primera figura Miguel López-Astorga Filosofía syllogism First figure formal logic mental models inferential activity La problemática acerca de la conclusión del silogismo de la primera figura Miguel López-Astorga Filosofía syllogism First figure formal logic mental models inferential activity Espino and Santamaria experimentally demonstrate that, if the syllogisms in the first figure are not presented as is the usual practice, that is, separating their two premises into two different lines, but linking the two premises into one line by means of a full stop, individuals tend to draw from such premises conclusions in which the subject and the predicate are not in the customary order, but rotated. In their view, this finding is consistent with the assumptions of the mental models theory. Nevertheless, in this paper, I will show that what this fact really depends on the approach that is adopted, since a framework based on formal logic also has resources to explain it, and hence can lead us to assume theses different from those proposed by Espino and Santamaria. 2014 artículo científico 0717-554X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10131702005 es http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=101 Cinta de Moebio application/pdf Universidad de Chile Cinta de Moebio (Chile) Num.50 |
| title | La problemática acerca de la conclusión del silogismo de la primera figura |
| topic | Filosofía syllogism First figure formal logic mental models inferential activity |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10131702005 |