Una defensa restringida a la teoría de las preferencias reveladas
Fuente:
Redalyc
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Artículo científico |
| Lingua: | es |
| Pubblicazione: |
Universidad de Chile
2023
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1876431632861233152 |
|---|---|
| author | Felipe Núñez |
| author_facet | Felipe Núñez |
| contents | Una defensa restringida a la teoría de las preferencias reveladas Felipe Núñez Filosofía preferences microeconomics Paul Samuelson revealed preferences Philosophy of economics This paper presents a restricted defence of the revealed preference theory (RPT) considering the critical argumentation of Villacís (Revealed preference versus the utilitarian approach) against it. It is shown that the RPT is an improvement in methodological terms for economic research and an improvement as a formal microeconomic foundation. I will show that, first, the criticisms raised against RPT are misguided insofar as 1. they assume that the aim of RPT is to offer a behaviourist epistemology and 2. they assume that to hold a behaviourist view of preferences is to hold a behaviourist view of microeconomic foundations. Second, I will show that the formal critique raised by Villacís is ineffective because there is an ambiguity as to what players' preferences depend on in the context of strategic games. 2023 artículo científico 0717-554X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10175782004 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/101/10175782004/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/101/10175782004/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/101/10175782004/10175782004.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/101/10175782004/movil https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2023000200120 es http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=101 Cinta de Moebio application/pdf Universidad de Chile Cinta de Moebio (Chile) Num.77 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_10175782004 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | es |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publisher | Universidad de Chile |
| spellingShingle | Una defensa restringida a la teoría de las preferencias reveladas Felipe Núñez Filosofía preferences microeconomics Paul Samuelson revealed preferences Philosophy of economics Una defensa restringida a la teoría de las preferencias reveladas Felipe Núñez Filosofía preferences microeconomics Paul Samuelson revealed preferences Philosophy of economics This paper presents a restricted defence of the revealed preference theory (RPT) considering the critical argumentation of Villacís (Revealed preference versus the utilitarian approach) against it. It is shown that the RPT is an improvement in methodological terms for economic research and an improvement as a formal microeconomic foundation. I will show that, first, the criticisms raised against RPT are misguided insofar as 1. they assume that the aim of RPT is to offer a behaviourist epistemology and 2. they assume that to hold a behaviourist view of preferences is to hold a behaviourist view of microeconomic foundations. Second, I will show that the formal critique raised by Villacís is ineffective because there is an ambiguity as to what players' preferences depend on in the context of strategic games. 2023 artículo científico 0717-554X https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10175782004 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/101/10175782004/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/101/10175782004/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/101/10175782004/10175782004.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/101/10175782004/movil https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2023000200120 es http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=101 Cinta de Moebio application/pdf Universidad de Chile Cinta de Moebio (Chile) Num.77 |
| title | Una defensa restringida a la teoría de las preferencias reveladas |
| topic | Filosofía preferences microeconomics Paul Samuelson revealed preferences Philosophy of economics |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10175782004 https://www.redalyc.org/journal/101/10175782004/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/101/10175782004/html/ https://www.redalyc.org/journal/101/10175782004/10175782004.epub https://www.redalyc.org/journal/101/10175782004/movil https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2023000200120 |