Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miriam de Abreu Almeida
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: Universidad de Antioquia 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=105238622018
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866588282148618240
author Miriam de Abreu Almeida
author_facet Miriam de Abreu Almeida
contents Clinical indicators to monitor patients with risk for ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion Miriam de Abreu Almeida Marcos Barragan da Silva Bruna Paulsen Panato Ana Paula de Oliveira Siqueira Bruna Engelman Isis Marques Severo Aline Tsuma Gaedke Nomura Mariana Palma da Silva Medicina neurology critical care classification) validation study Outcome assessment (health care Objective. Select and validate the clinical indicators to monitor patients on risk for ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion, according to the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). Methodology. Validation study carried out between November 2012 and August 2013, in a Brazilian hospital. Seventeen judges nurses evaluated the clinical indicators of Nursing Outcomes, according to NOC for patients on risk for ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion. In the first stage, were selected the nursing results for the assessment of the studied diagnosis and, in the second nurses assessment the importance of the indicators of the validated results in the previous step through a five points Likert scale (1 = not important to 5 = extremely important). Were used the content validity index (CVI) that corresponds to the calculation of weighted averages of them marks awarded for each indicator, as it considered the following weights: 1=0.00, 2=0.25, 3=0.50; 4=0.75; 5=1.00. For categorization, the CVI considered as critical = ≥0.80; supplementary =≥0.50 to 0.79 and were disposed results <0.50. Results. Of the 9 nursing results, only the cerebral tissue perfusion obtained a 100% consensus. The CVI of the 18 indicators of this result showed that five were validated as critical (impaired neurological reflexes, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, reduced level of consciousness and mean arterial pressure), 12 were validated as supplementary (Agitation, Impaired cognition, Intracranial pressure, Syncope, Vomiting, Findings of cerebral angiography, Headache, Restlessness, Fever, Unexplained anxiety, listlessness and Hiccughs) and one was disposed (carotid bruit). Conclusions. The validation of information about the conditions of risk may allow early intervention to minimize the consequences of ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion. 2015 artículo científico 0120-5307 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=105238622018 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=1052 Investigación y Educación en Enfermería application/pdf Universidad de Antioquia Investigación y Educación en Enfermería (Colombia) Num.1 Vol.33
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_105238622018
language en
publishDate 2015
publisher Universidad de Antioquia
spellingShingle Clinical indicators to monitor patients with risk for ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion
Miriam de Abreu Almeida
Medicina
neurology
critical care
classification)
validation study
Outcome assessment (health care
Clinical indicators to monitor patients with risk for ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion Miriam de Abreu Almeida Marcos Barragan da Silva Bruna Paulsen Panato Ana Paula de Oliveira Siqueira Bruna Engelman Isis Marques Severo Aline Tsuma Gaedke Nomura Mariana Palma da Silva Medicina neurology critical care classification) validation study Outcome assessment (health care Objective. Select and validate the clinical indicators to monitor patients on risk for ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion, according to the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). Methodology. Validation study carried out between November 2012 and August 2013, in a Brazilian hospital. Seventeen judges nurses evaluated the clinical indicators of Nursing Outcomes, according to NOC for patients on risk for ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion. In the first stage, were selected the nursing results for the assessment of the studied diagnosis and, in the second nurses assessment the importance of the indicators of the validated results in the previous step through a five points Likert scale (1 = not important to 5 = extremely important). Were used the content validity index (CVI) that corresponds to the calculation of weighted averages of them marks awarded for each indicator, as it considered the following weights: 1=0.00, 2=0.25, 3=0.50; 4=0.75; 5=1.00. For categorization, the CVI considered as critical = ≥0.80; supplementary =≥0.50 to 0.79 and were disposed results <0.50. Results. Of the 9 nursing results, only the cerebral tissue perfusion obtained a 100% consensus. The CVI of the 18 indicators of this result showed that five were validated as critical (impaired neurological reflexes, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, reduced level of consciousness and mean arterial pressure), 12 were validated as supplementary (Agitation, Impaired cognition, Intracranial pressure, Syncope, Vomiting, Findings of cerebral angiography, Headache, Restlessness, Fever, Unexplained anxiety, listlessness and Hiccughs) and one was disposed (carotid bruit). Conclusions. The validation of information about the conditions of risk may allow early intervention to minimize the consequences of ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion. 2015 artículo científico 0120-5307 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=105238622018 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=1052 Investigación y Educación en Enfermería application/pdf Universidad de Antioquia Investigación y Educación en Enfermería (Colombia) Num.1 Vol.33
title Clinical indicators to monitor patients with risk for ineffective cerebral tissue perfusion
topic Medicina
neurology
critical care
classification)
validation study
Outcome assessment (health care
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=105238622018