Rethinking rational choice and agency theory: ranchers and managers in the 19th century

Fuente: Redalyc
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karl Monsma
Format: Artículo científico
Language:en
Published: Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1876477497193791488
author Karl Monsma
author_facet Karl Monsma
contents Rethinking rational choice and agency theory: ranchers and managers in the 19th century Karl Monsma Multidisciplinarias (Ciencias Sociales) Ranches Buenos Aires Agency theory : Rational choice Rio Grande do Sul The article explores the value and limits of agency theory by comparing relations between ranchers and their managers in Rio Grande do Sul and Buenos Aires during the first few decades of the 19th century. Agency theory and the rational choice perspective are based on a deficient theory of action, assuming presocial actors who use a universal rationality to choose the most effective behaviors for attaining their objectives. Even so, agency theory is useful for identifying central dilemmas in the principal-agent relationship and for delimiting the set of viable solutions. As actors generally do not try to optimize their choices, but instead look for satisfactory solutions for the problems they encounter, only history and culture explain the ?choice? of one viable arrangement and not another. Context and experience are internalized as habitus and practical consciousness, which shape the definition of problems and strategies for solving them. The ranchers studied here approached similar questions of agency in different ways. Part of this was due to divergent contexts, but much of it was related to their distinct habitus, stemming from the origin of the Argentine rancher in the colonial merchant class, lacking rural experience, and the origin of the Brazilian rancher in an elite of military officers and ranchers, dependent on the state. In both cases, repeated interaction through time led to important changes in the relationship between rancher and manager that are difficult for rational choice approaches to explain. 2000 artículo científico 0102-6909 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10704306 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=107 Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais application/pdf Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais (Brasil) Num.43 Vol.15
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_10704306
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2000
publisher Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais
spellingShingle Rethinking rational choice and agency theory: ranchers and managers in the 19th century
Karl Monsma
Multidisciplinarias (Ciencias Sociales)
Ranches
Buenos Aires
Agency theory
: Rational choice
Rio Grande do Sul
Rethinking rational choice and agency theory: ranchers and managers in the 19th century Karl Monsma Multidisciplinarias (Ciencias Sociales) Ranches Buenos Aires Agency theory : Rational choice Rio Grande do Sul The article explores the value and limits of agency theory by comparing relations between ranchers and their managers in Rio Grande do Sul and Buenos Aires during the first few decades of the 19th century. Agency theory and the rational choice perspective are based on a deficient theory of action, assuming presocial actors who use a universal rationality to choose the most effective behaviors for attaining their objectives. Even so, agency theory is useful for identifying central dilemmas in the principal-agent relationship and for delimiting the set of viable solutions. As actors generally do not try to optimize their choices, but instead look for satisfactory solutions for the problems they encounter, only history and culture explain the ?choice? of one viable arrangement and not another. Context and experience are internalized as habitus and practical consciousness, which shape the definition of problems and strategies for solving them. The ranchers studied here approached similar questions of agency in different ways. Part of this was due to divergent contexts, but much of it was related to their distinct habitus, stemming from the origin of the Argentine rancher in the colonial merchant class, lacking rural experience, and the origin of the Brazilian rancher in an elite of military officers and ranchers, dependent on the state. In both cases, repeated interaction through time led to important changes in the relationship between rancher and manager that are difficult for rational choice approaches to explain. 2000 artículo científico 0102-6909 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10704306 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=107 Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais application/pdf Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais (Brasil) Num.43 Vol.15
title Rethinking rational choice and agency theory: ranchers and managers in the 19th century
topic Multidisciplinarias (Ciencias Sociales)
Ranches
Buenos Aires
Agency theory
: Rational choice
Rio Grande do Sul
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10704306