El discurso neoliberal en Venezuela: un estudio de la persuación
Fuente:
Redalyc
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo científico |
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
Universidad del Zulia
2001
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1876459652177199104 |
|---|---|
| author | Lenita D. Vieira |
| author_facet | Lenita D. Vieira |
| contents | El discurso neoliberal en Venezuela: un estudio de la persuación Lenita D. Vieira Lourdes Molero de Cabeza Sociología neo persuasion Argumentation liberal discourse discourse analysis This report is part of a more extensive examinationof persuasive strategies used in the editorialsof the Economia Hoy newspaper. It is basedon works of Patrick Charaudeau (1992 and1997). Its main objective is to determine the valuesthat justify, in the argumentative discourseof those editorials, the application of neo-liberalmeasures. To do this, a descriptive study wasmade of a sample of 48 texts published between1989 and 1997, which established the basis forthe following asseverations: a) The themes whichbecame the objectives of editorial communicationdealt with economic measures imposed by internationalfinancial organizations, with the lack ofgovernmental decisions as to their application,and the inadequacy or incorrectness of the measurestaken; b) A great percentage of the argumentswere based on truth values and 72,45% ofthem show a negative view of the political andeconomic conduction of the country and its respectiveprospects; c) 74,15% of arguments werebased on ethical values and denounced the of violationof those values; only 25,84% exhorted actionbased on those measures; d) In the pragmaticdomain, 55,38% of the arguments dealt with actionsrequired for the development of Venezuela;44,61% indicates those measures which were consideredinconvenient. There is a relative balancebetween the criticism and the presentation of specificproposals. E) Within a hedonistic viewpoint,references to the difficulties people are facing aremore frequent (60,52%) than those related totheir welfare. 2001 artículo científico 1315-0006 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=12210102 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=122 Espacio Abierto application/pdf Universidad del Zulia Espacio Abierto (República Bolivariana de Venezuela) Num.1 Vol.10 |
| format | Artículo científico |
| id | redalyc_12210102 |
| institution | Redalyc |
| language | en |
| publishDate | 2001 |
| publisher | Universidad del Zulia |
| spellingShingle | El discurso neoliberal en Venezuela: un estudio de la persuación Lenita D. Vieira Sociología neo persuasion Argumentation liberal discourse discourse analysis El discurso neoliberal en Venezuela: un estudio de la persuación Lenita D. Vieira Lourdes Molero de Cabeza Sociología neo persuasion Argumentation liberal discourse discourse analysis This report is part of a more extensive examinationof persuasive strategies used in the editorialsof the Economia Hoy newspaper. It is basedon works of Patrick Charaudeau (1992 and1997). Its main objective is to determine the valuesthat justify, in the argumentative discourseof those editorials, the application of neo-liberalmeasures. To do this, a descriptive study wasmade of a sample of 48 texts published between1989 and 1997, which established the basis forthe following asseverations: a) The themes whichbecame the objectives of editorial communicationdealt with economic measures imposed by internationalfinancial organizations, with the lack ofgovernmental decisions as to their application,and the inadequacy or incorrectness of the measurestaken; b) A great percentage of the argumentswere based on truth values and 72,45% ofthem show a negative view of the political andeconomic conduction of the country and its respectiveprospects; c) 74,15% of arguments werebased on ethical values and denounced the of violationof those values; only 25,84% exhorted actionbased on those measures; d) In the pragmaticdomain, 55,38% of the arguments dealt with actionsrequired for the development of Venezuela;44,61% indicates those measures which were consideredinconvenient. There is a relative balancebetween the criticism and the presentation of specificproposals. E) Within a hedonistic viewpoint,references to the difficulties people are facing aremore frequent (60,52%) than those related totheir welfare. 2001 artículo científico 1315-0006 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=12210102 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=122 Espacio Abierto application/pdf Universidad del Zulia Espacio Abierto (República Bolivariana de Venezuela) Num.1 Vol.10 |
| title | El discurso neoliberal en Venezuela: un estudio de la persuación |
| topic | Sociología neo persuasion Argumentation liberal discourse discourse analysis |
| url | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=12210102 |