A numerical representation of acyclic preferences when non-comparability and indifference are concepts with different meaning

Fuente: Redalyc
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: LEOBARDO PLATA-PÉREZ
Natura: Artículo científico
Lingua:en
Pubblicazione: Universidad de Guadalajara 2004
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1876432712164704256
author LEOBARDO PLATA-PÉREZ
author_facet LEOBARDO PLATA-PÉREZ
contents A numerical representation of acyclic preferences when non-comparability and indifference are concepts with different meaning LEOBARDO PLATA-PÉREZ Economía y Finanzas The use of utility functions implies transitivity and completeness of preferences. Empirical evidence shows that these conditions fail in several individual cases. Acyclicity of preferences represents an interesting weakness of preference rationality, because it admits intransitivity of indifference and noncomparability between some alternatives. Utility correspondences were introduced by Subiza (1994) as a numerical representations of acyclic preferences. Subiza's framework is modified in this paper in order to obtain numerical representations in which we can interpret non-comparability and indifference as concepts with different meaning. Both concepts have been considered with the same meaning in the standard presentations that assume strict preference as a primitive concept. 2004 artículo científico 1870-6622 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=125015745003 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=1250 EconoQuantum application/pdf Universidad de Guadalajara EconoQuantum (México) Vol.1
format Artículo científico
id redalyc_125015745003
institution Redalyc
language en
publishDate 2004
publisher Universidad de Guadalajara
spellingShingle A numerical representation of acyclic preferences when non-comparability and indifference are concepts with different meaning
LEOBARDO PLATA-PÉREZ
Economía y Finanzas
A numerical representation of acyclic preferences when non-comparability and indifference are concepts with different meaning LEOBARDO PLATA-PÉREZ Economía y Finanzas The use of utility functions implies transitivity and completeness of preferences. Empirical evidence shows that these conditions fail in several individual cases. Acyclicity of preferences represents an interesting weakness of preference rationality, because it admits intransitivity of indifference and noncomparability between some alternatives. Utility correspondences were introduced by Subiza (1994) as a numerical representations of acyclic preferences. Subiza's framework is modified in this paper in order to obtain numerical representations in which we can interpret non-comparability and indifference as concepts with different meaning. Both concepts have been considered with the same meaning in the standard presentations that assume strict preference as a primitive concept. 2004 artículo científico 1870-6622 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=125015745003 en http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=1250 EconoQuantum application/pdf Universidad de Guadalajara EconoQuantum (México) Vol.1
title A numerical representation of acyclic preferences when non-comparability and indifference are concepts with different meaning
topic Economía y Finanzas
url https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=125015745003